Continuous Lidocaine Infusion for Management of Perioperative Burn Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Thermal injury results in one of the most intense and prolonged forms of pain the body can experience. Opioid narcotics are the most powerful drugs for acute and chronic pain, and their use in the perioperative period has been the mainstay of treatment; although medication requirements in burn patients are often underestimated. More medication may not be the answer, as relatively large doses of short acting opioids in the operative theater are associated with greater postoperative opioid consumption and higher pain scores. Furthermore, extensive use of opioids has resulted in the development of by hyperalgesia and allodynia. Lidocaine is an amide local anesthetic that has analgesic, anti-hyperalgesic, antiarrhythmic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Over the past 25 years, systemic lidocaine has been used for perioperative pain management in a variety of surgical procedures. The design of this study will examine if lidocaine will reduce the pain scores and narcotic utilization in patients undergoing surgical procedures for burn injuries. The intervention group will receive a bolus dose of lidocaine followed by a continuous infusion over 24 hours. The control group will get an equal volume of saline. The investigators will compare pain scores, opioid use, and narcotic equivalents based on body weight and burn surface area (BSA) grafted.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Sep 2012
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 7, 2017
CompletedJuly 3, 2018
June 1, 2018
2 years
February 10, 2014
February 20, 2017
June 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Narcotic Consumption (Measured in mg/kg Narcotic Consumption)
The infusion was initiated at 1.5mg/kg for 30 minutes prior to surgery start, followed by a 2.0 mg/kg/hr infusion at the time of incision start. The rate was reduced to 1.5mg/kg/hr for the remainder of the 24 hour period. A standardized post-operative pain management strategy (morphine and oxycodone) was followed by clinical staff, based on a standardized pain scale rating tool. The difference in narcotic consumption and number of pain medication doses over the 72-hour post-operative period was compared using an unadjusted Wilcoxon rank sum test due to non-normal data distribution.
24-hours post surgery
Study Arms (2)
Normal pain management
PLACEBO COMPARATORNormal saline (bolus followed by continuous infusion)
Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALLidocaine (Pre-operative = 1.5kg/mg over a minimum of 30 minutes; peri-operative = 2.0mg/kg/hour; Post-operative = 1.5kg/mg/hour)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Burn patient ≥ 18 years of age
- Burn patient scheduled to go to OR for excision and/or grafting procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Burn patient \< 18 years of age
- Intubated patient on sedation drip
- Prolonged hypotension defined as Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) \< 90 mm/Hg for greater than 30 minutes in the pre-op area
- Severe underlying cardiovascular disease (documented ejection fraction \< 40%)
- Documented conduction block, bradycardia or active congestive heart failure
- Documented active gastritis or ulcers
- Previous steroid medication history if documented adrenal insufficiency
- Patient with documented liver disease
- Patient with epilepsy or known seizure disorder
- Pregnant Women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. William J Mohr
- Organization
- Health Partners
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William Mohr, MD
Regions Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sandi Wewerka, MPH
Regions Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2014
First Posted
February 11, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 3, 2018
Results First Posted
June 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2018-06