Electroacupuncture Versus Fast-track Perioperative Program for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Electroacupuncture Versus Fast-track Perioperative Program for Reducing Duration of Postoperative Ileus and Hospital Stay After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
164
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Our previous study demonstrated that electroacupuncture at Zusanli, Sanyinjiao, Hegu, and Zhigou reduces the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within a traditional perioperative care setting. Recent evidence also suggested that a 'fast-track' perioperative program may help accelerate recovery after colorectal surgery. As electroacupuncture is simpler to implement and less labor intensive, it may be the preferred adjunct therapy if it is proven to be noninferior to fast-track program in reducing the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of electroacupuncture and fast-track program in reducing the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Design: Prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial. Subjects: One hundred sixty-four consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection of colonic and upper rectal cancer will be recruited. Interventions: Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either: (A) electroacupuncture with traditional perioperative care; or (B) fast-track program without acupuncture. Outcome measures: Primary outcome: time to defecation. Secondary outcomes: duration of hospital stay, time of first passing flatus, time to resume diet, pain scores, analgesic requirement, morbidity, and medical costs. Conclusions: This study will determine if electroacupuncture is noninferior to fast-track program in reducing the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Electroacupuncture may be the preferred perioperative adjunct therapy to laparoscopic colorectal surgery because it is simpler to implement and less labor intensive than fast-track program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 11, 2014
February 1, 2014
1.9 years
February 10, 2014
February 10, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to defecation
Measured in hours, from the time the laparoscopic surgery ends till the first observed passage of stool.
Up to 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Total postoperative hospital stay
Up to 1 month
Time of first passing flatus reported by the patients
Up to 1 month
Time that the patients tolerated solid diet
Up to 1 month
Time to walk independently
Up to 1 month
Pain scores on visual analog scale
Up to 1 month
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Electroacupuncture
EXPERIMENTALBilateral acupoints relevant to the treatment of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and constipation, including Zusanli (stomach meridian ST-36), Sanyinjiao (spleen meridian SP-6), Hegu (large intestine meridian LI-4), and Zhigou (triple energizer meridian TE-6), will be used. Electric stimulation at a frequency of 50 Hz will be employed to the acupuncture needles.
Fast-track program
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe design of this program is based on the consensus between our surgeons, anesthetists, physiotherapists, dietitians, and nurses, who have reviewed the relevant literature and made appropriate adjustments to suit the local situation.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection of colonic and upper rectal cancer
- Age of patients between 18 and 80 years
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading I-II
- Patients with no severe physical disability
- Patients who require no assistance with the activities of daily living
- Informed consent available
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision, abdominoperineal resection, or total/proctocolectomy
- Patients with planned stoma creation
- Patients undergoing emergency surgery
- Patients with evidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis
- Patients with previous history of midline laparotomy
- Patients who are expected to receive epidural opioids for postoperative pain management
- Patients with cardiac pacemaker
- Patients who are allergic to the acupuncture needles
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Simon S. M. Ng, MD
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2014
First Posted
February 11, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02