Ureteral Stents Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Initial Urinary Drainage
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) versus double J stent (JJ) as an initial urinary drainage in children
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 23, 2014
CompletedApril 23, 2014
March 1, 2014
3 years
February 3, 2014
February 4, 2014
March 19, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Period to Return to Normal Creatinine
period required for normalization of serum creatinine after initial urinary drainage using percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteric stent in children with obstructive calcular anuria and Acute Renal Failure serum creatinine was compared to normal values in matched healthy children
1 week
Complications of Each Drainage Method
complications of initial urinary drainage using percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteric stent in children with Obstructive Anuria and Acute Renal Failure (mucosal complications, failure of insertion, slippage, fever and infection, hematuria, leakage) complications were calculated per 45 ureterorenal units in PCN group and 90 ureterorenal units in Double J group
1 week
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The Number of Subsequent Interventions Needed for Clearance of Stones .
6 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Factors Affecting the Outcome of Each Group (Operative Time, Safety and Efficacy)
1 week
Study Arms (2)
percutaneous nephrostomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORpercutaneous nephrostomy insertion (6-8 Fr in size) for initial urinary drainage followed by definitive stone management.
Bilateral double J ureteric stents
ACTIVE COMPARATORdouble J ureteric stent insertion (4.8-6 Fr JJ in size) for initial urinary drainage followed by definitive stone management.
Interventions
The 1st arm was drained by PCN. This was performed under general anesthesia (GA) and fluoroscopic guidance.
The 2nd arm was drained by bilateral JJ . This was performed under general anesthesia (GA) and fluoroscopic guidance.
(shockwave lithotripsy, chemodissolution therapy, ureteroscopy or open surgery) for clearance of stones.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- children ≤12 years old presenting with Obstructive Anuria and Acute Renal Failure due to bilateral ureteric stones
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with grade 0-1 hydronephrosis
- fever, pyonephrosis or sepsis.
- any contraindication to both methods of drainage (urinary diversion, urethral stricture or uncontrolled coagulopathy).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Cairo University Hospitals
Cairo, 12222, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
ElSheemy MS, Shouman AM, Shoukry AI, ElShenoufy A, Aboulela W, Daw K, Hussein AA, Morsi HA, Badawy H. Ureteric stents vs percutaneous nephrostomy for initial urinary drainage in children with obstructive anuria and acute renal failure due to ureteric calculi: a prospective, randomised study. BJU Int. 2015 Mar;115(3):473-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12768. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
PMID: 24698195DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- dr Mohammed Said ElSheemy
- Organization
- Cairo University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammed S ElSheemy, A professor
Cairo University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associte professor of urology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2014
First Posted
February 5, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 23, 2014
Results First Posted
April 23, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03