Study Stopped
Unable to enroll any patients in the study due to other on-going studies.
Retained Urine Volume and Bacteriuria in Traditional Versus Vented Urine Drainage Systems
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to see if there are differences in urine drainage between two types of indwelling bladder catheter systems (Foley catheter) in hospitalized patients. The difference between the two catheters is that one catheter is vented (the study catheter) and the other is a standard non-vented catheter. The vented catheter may drain urine better than a standard non-vented catheter. If a vented catheter drains the bladder better than a non-vented catheter it may lower the risk of retained urine in the bladder which could help prevent urinary tract infections.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedJuly 24, 2019
July 1, 2019
1 month
January 30, 2014
July 23, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bacteriuria
Evidence of bacteriuria, a potential precursor to Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI), will be used to study the potential effect of the vented urinary drainage system intervention on CAUTI.
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Retained Urine
7 days
Presence of biofilms in catheter materials
7 days
Study Arms (2)
Vented urinary drainage system
EXPERIMENTALThis group will be catheterized with a vented urinary drainage system. Several data sets will be evaluated to compare the two arms of the study: retained urine volume, the difference (ΔH) in meniscus heights in the dependent loops, time necessary for drainage of dependent loops, and incidence of bacteriuria.
Non-vented urinary drainage system
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will be catheterized with a non-vented urinary drainage system. Several data sets will be evaluated to compare the two arms of the study: retained urine volume, the difference (ΔH) in meniscus heights in the dependent loops, time necessary for drainage of dependent loops, and incidence of bacteriuria.
Interventions
This group will be catheterized with a vented urinary drainage system. Several data sets will be evaluated to compare the two arms of the study: retained urine volume, the difference (ΔH) in meniscus heights in the dependent loops, time necessary for drainage of dependent loops, and incidence of bacteriuria.
This group will be catheterized with a non-vented urinary drainage system. Several data sets will be evaluated to compare the two arms of the study: retained urine volume, the difference (ΔH) in meniscus heights in the dependent loops, time necessary for drainage of dependent loops, and incidence of bacteriuria.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled for a planned surgery
- Anticipated indwelling bladder catheter placement for greater than 24 hours
- Anticipated post-op admission to a surgical ICU
You may not qualify if:
- Unstable renal function as self-reported
- Anticipated bandaged postoperative suprapubic incisions
- Anatomical deformity that precludes appropriate suprapubic access for ultrasound bladder scanning
- Surgical procedure that prevents accurate core body temperature by any means other than by bladder temperature
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William B. Smith, MD
University of Florida
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2014
First Posted
February 3, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 24, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07