Hard-soled Shoe Versus Short Leg Walking Cast for a Fifth Metatarsal Avulsion Fracture: A Randomized Multicenter Noninferiority Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures are common and can usually be treated conservatively. Symptomatic care consisting of protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe, air-cast walking boot, or below-knee walking cast have been successful. Several papers reported that early rehabilitation may decrease ankle stiffness, muscle and bone atrophy, and aids in early return to activities. However, early motion of the ankle joint may have the risk of displacement of the fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures. However, studies using hard-sole shoe for protected weightbearing and allowing motion of the ankle joint had successful results. Clapper et al. compared the results of hard-soled shoe and walking cast for a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture and reported that all avulsion fractures healed uneventfully and that the results were similar between the two. However, this was not a randomized controlled trial. Devices such as air-cast walking boot, plaster slipper, or Jone's dressing can also be used for the treatment. However, we decided to compare results of hard-soled shoe and short leg walking cast for the treatment of a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture. We hypothesized that the 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed on 6 months after a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture treated with protected weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe is not inferior to protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast but is superior to short leg walking cast with respect to time to return to normal daily life and patient's satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 14, 2015
October 1, 2015
2 years
January 29, 2014
October 11, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
100mm visual analogue scale (VAS)
The 100mm VAS is widely used self assessment tool for evaluating pain after fracture.
6 months after a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Time to return to preinjury activity
upto 6 months
patients' subjective satisfactions
3, 5, 8, 12 weeks and 6 months after injury
Study Arms (2)
short leg walking cast
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter 1 weeks of immobilization in a short leg posterior splint, patient is allowed protected weightbearing in a short leg walking cast
hard-soled shoe
EXPERIMENTALAfter 1 weeks of immobilization in a short leg posterior splint, patient is allowed tolerable weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe
Interventions
Patients allocated to experiment group are allowed tolerable weightbearing in a hard-soled shoe after one week of immobilization in a posterior splint
Patients allocated to control group are allowed tolerable weightbearing in a short leg walking cast after one week of immobilization in a posterior splint
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age between 18 and 65 years
- fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture
You may not qualify if:
- open fractures
- pathologic fractures
- a fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture combined with other lower extremity injuries such as Lisfranc injury
- patients with diabetes or neuroarthropathy
- patients with obesity (BMI \>30, weight \>100 kg)
- any other conditions that are expected to prevent the patients from following the study protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Sanbon Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Medicine
Gunpo, Gyeongi, 435-040, South Korea
CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University
Seongnam, Gyeongi, 463-712, South Korea
Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
Seoul, 150-950, South Korea
Related Publications (7)
Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70238-x.
PMID: 8604867BACKGROUNDClapper MF, O'Brien TJ, Lyons PM. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jun;(315):238-41.
PMID: 7634674BACKGROUNDGray AC, Rooney BP, Ingram R. A prospective comparison of two treatment options for tuberosity fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot (Edinb). 2008 Sep;18(3):156-8. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 May 19.
PMID: 20307430BACKGROUNDHeineck J, Wolz M, Haupt C, Rammelt S, Schneiders W. Fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture: a rational basis for postoperative treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Aug;129(8):1089-92. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0756-x. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
PMID: 18818936BACKGROUNDShahid MK, Punwar S, Boulind C, Bannister G. Aircast walking boot and below-knee walking cast for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: a comparative cohort study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):75-9. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460197.
PMID: 23386764BACKGROUNDVorlat P, Achtergael W, Haentjens P. Predictors of outcome of non-displaced fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal. Int Orthop. 2007 Feb;31(1):5-10. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0116-9. Epub 2006 May 23.
PMID: 16721621BACKGROUNDWiener BD, Linder JF, Giattini JF. Treatment of fractures of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 1997 May;18(5):267-9. doi: 10.1177/107110079701800504.
PMID: 9167925BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD
Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD
Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2014
First Posted
January 31, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 14, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10