Developing and Testing a Personalized Evidence-based Shared Decision-making Tool for Stent Selection
DECIDE-PCI
1 other identifier
observational
586
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to gather input from patients who have undergone PCI, their family and/or caregivers, and clinicians to develop a patient decision aid. The purpose of the decision aid is to deliver information, including individualized estimates of patients' restenosis risk, in an understandable format that would be informative and assist in decision-making for patients undergoing PCI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2014
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 24, 2019
CompletedAugust 6, 2019
July 1, 2019
2.3 years
January 22, 2014
April 19, 2018
July 26, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of Pre-implementation, Post-implementation With Decision Coaching, and Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching
The primary outcome was whether or not patients participated in SDM regarding stent choice. Patients were categorized as having participated in SDM if they answered anything other than "doctor alone" in response to the question "Who chose the type of stent?"
30 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Concordance Between Stent Preference and Stent Received Was a Secondary Outcome.
30 months
Study Arms (2)
Heart disease
Adults with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease and may have had a percutaneous coronary intervention.
Healthy adults
Adults without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Focus groups will be held.
Eligibility Criteria
Adults with and without coronary artery disease
You may qualify if:
- \>18 years old
- English or Spanish speaking
- Presence of coronary disease, or a caregiver/relative of one with coronary disease
You may not qualify if:
- non-English or non-Spanish speaking
- dementia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Truman Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
Related Publications (2)
Chhatriwalla AK, Decker C, Gialde E, Catley D, Goggin K, Jaschke K, Jones P, deBronkart D, Sun T, Spertus JA. Developing and Testing a Personalized, Evidence-Based, Shared Decision-Making Tool for Stent Selection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using a Pre-Post Study Design. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005139. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005139.
PMID: 30764654DERIVEDQintar M, Chhatriwalla AK, Arnold SV, Tang F, Buchanan DM, Shafiq A, Pokharel Y, deBronkart D, Ashraf JM, Spertus JA. Beyond restenosis: Patients' preference for drug eluting or bare metal stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 1;90(3):357-363. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26946. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
PMID: 28168845DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The lack of randomization, availability of ePrism at hospitals, estimation of TVR risk in the SDM tool without the availability of angiographic data, and physicians were not surveyed for additional variables that impacted their stent selection.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Carole Decker
- Organization
- Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John A Spertus, MD, MPH
University of Missouri, Kansas City
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Daniel Lauer/Missouri Endowed Chair
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2014
First Posted
January 28, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 31, 2016
Study Completion
December 31, 2016
Last Updated
August 6, 2019
Results First Posted
July 24, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07