Pilot Study for Automated Deep Brain Stimulation Programming
DBS-Expert: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation Programming Using Functional Mapping - Phase I
2 other identifiers
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The clinical utility of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease has been well established; however, there is a great disparity in outcomes among DBS recipients due to varied postoperative management, particularly concerning the choosing of an optimal set of programming parameters from the thousands of possible combinations. This study will evaluate the use of motion sensor based assessments to develop a functional map and algorithms to automatically determine a set of programming parameters that maximize symptomatic benefits while minimizing side effects and battery consumption.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 9, 2016
CompletedSeptember 22, 2016
August 1, 2016
9 months
December 5, 2013
June 27, 2016
August 15, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change From Baseline in Kinesia HomeView Symptom Ratings After Guided DBS Programming
Symptoms were first assessed with the implanted pulse generator (IPG) turned off for at least 30 minutes to allow the after-effects of stimulation to wear off (baseline). Symptoms were measured again with the IPG turned on at a setting that both minimized the average severity of tremor and bradykinesia and minimized side effects. The Kinesia score rated symptom severity (0, normal; 4, most severe) in four categories: tremor, finger tapping speed, finger tapping amplitude, and finger tapping rhythm. Scores for the four motor symptoms were averaged and converted to percent change from baseline.
Within two days of standard clinical DBS programming session
Study Arms (1)
Automated Programming
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will have DBS settings changed as guided by prototype DBS-Expert software. Tremor, bradykinesia, and dyskinesia will be assessed at each DBS setting.
Interventions
Prototype DBS-Expert software will be used to guide a clinician through DBS programming.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease
- Implanted deep brain stimulation system awaiting initial programming session
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with significant psychiatric illness or dementia
- Significant cognitive impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Cincinnati Department of Neurology
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
Related Publications (1)
Heldman DA, Pulliam CL, Urrea Mendoza E, Gartner M, Giuffrida JP, Montgomery EB Jr, Espay AJ, Revilla FJ. Computer-Guided Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Parkinson's Disease. Neuromodulation. 2016 Feb;19(2):127-32. doi: 10.1111/ner.12372. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
PMID: 26621764RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Biomedical Research Manager
- Organization
- Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dustin A Heldman, PhD
Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2013
First Posted
January 28, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 22, 2016
Results First Posted
August 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08