Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Morphine Chloride to a Low Dose of Bupivacaine as Intradural Anaesthetic for the Removal Surgery of the Hemorrhoids
Assessment of the Analgesic Efficacy of Morphine Chloride in Addition to a Low Dose Solution of Spinal Anaesthetic in Hemorrhoidectomy Compared to a Standard Dose of Spinal Local Anaesthetic. Simple Blind, Randomized, With Blinded Evaluation by Third Parties Clinical Trial.
2 other identifiers
interventional
63
1 country
2
Brief Summary
A single blind, randomized, with blinded evaluation by third parties clinical trial is carried out to assess the analgesic efficay of the addition of morphine chloride to a low dose solution of spinal local anaesthetic compared to a standard dose spinal anaesthetic in the haemorrhoid surgery. The objective of this clinical trial is to assess if the experimental treatment is as efficacy as the standard treatment in the anesthetic and analgesic effects with less side effects, greater and earlier mobility after surgery and shortened the hospitalization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Mar 2012
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 1, 2014
CompletedAugust 15, 2016
August 1, 2014
2 years
January 22, 2014
August 5, 2014
July 15, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Measurement of Time to Start the Anaesthetic Effect
To compare whether the addition of morphine chloride to a low dose intradural solution of the local anaesthetic bupivacaine is as effective as an administration of a single dose of bupivacaine.
First 20 minutes between administration and beginning of surgery
Measurement of the Analgesic Effect After Surgery by VAS From 0 to 10, Where 0 is no Pain and 10 is the Worst Pain Imaginable.
To compare whether the addition of morphine chloride to a low dose solution of bupivacaine and improves the analgesic treatment than a single administration of bupivacaine.
Up to 72 hours from the end of the surgery in the hospital stay and during the next 7 days at home, after discharge
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Greater and Earlier Mobilization Measured by Bromage Scale.
During the first 24 hours after surgery and at the entry and exit of the resuscitation unit
Number of Adverse Events
Up to 72 hours from the intervention and the hopitalary stay and during the next 7 days after discharge
Time of Hospitalization
Up to 72 hours after the intervention
Study Arms (2)
Bupivacaine + Morphine Chloride
EXPERIMENTALPeople in this arm will receive treatment with morphine chloride in addition to a low dose solution of the local intradural anaesthetic bupivacaine.
Bupivacaine standard dose
ACTIVE COMPARATORPeople in this arm will receive treatment with the standard dose of the local intradural anaesthetic bupivacaine
Interventions
A dose of morphine chloride added to a low dose solution of bupivacaine administered intradural
Single intradural standard dose of bupivacaine
A dose of morphine chloride added to a low dose solution of bupivacaine administered intradural
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy.
- Age between 18 and 64.
- Both gender
- ASA I to III.
- With indication for spinal block.
- People capable to grant the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with allergies to the study drugs.
- Patients with any contraindication for performing a spinal technique (coagulation disorders, fever, intracraneal hypertension, abscess in the puncture site, etc..).
- Patients with previous neurological disorders.
- Pregnant women.
- Women who may be pregnant and do not have a negative pregnancy test.
- Breastfeeding women.
- Patients with uncapable to give informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28805, Spain
Hospital del Henares
Coslada, Madrid, 28822, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Antonio Rodríguez Miguel
- Organization
- Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manuel Ruiz Castro, MD, PhD
Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2014
First Posted
January 28, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 15, 2016
Results First Posted
September 1, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08