Study Stopped
Recruitment too slow
RCT of Efficacy and Safety of Sedation Compared to General Anesthesia for ERCP
A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of Efficacy and Safety of Sedation Compared to General Anesthesia for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-pancreatography
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is a worldwide trend to minimally invasive interventions, which results in increasing numbers of interventions performed outside of the operating room. Currently, approximately 12 to 15% of total anaesthetic workload is non-operating room anaesthesia (NORA) and this anaesthetic activity is increasing. Many of these interventions need supplementary comfort measures to have relaxed patients and high success rates. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is performed \>50,000 times per year in the U.S.,and is a typical minimally invasive intervention that needs patient sedation. There is a controversy about the optimal comfort intervention in minimally invasive interventions and in particular in ERCP. Two different approaches to insure patients' comfort have been proposed: general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation or sedation with spontaneous ventilation. Well-performed studies on sedation versus general anaesthesia using a randomized controlled trial design with observer blinding will contribute to improve the decision-making for the optimal comfort measures in minimally invasive procedures. At our knowledge such a randomized controlled trial has not been reported before. The investigators hypothesize that deep sedation without tracheal intubation will achieve similar success rates for ERCP as general anaesthesia and will have similar rates of harmful postoperative effects. The primary aim of this trial is to demonstrate that the success rate of ERCP is not inferior in patients randomized to deep sedation without orotracheal intubation vs general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. Secondary aims include a comparison between randomization groups of patient safety, patient and endoscopist satisfaction, duration of patient recovery and of anesthesia procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 13, 2023
CompletedFebruary 15, 2023
February 1, 2023
9 years
January 24, 2014
February 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ERCP success rate
The primary study outcome will be a comparison between patient allocation groups and the percentage of completely successful ERCP. Success of ERCP is defined as achieving both high completion and low adverse event rate.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Success of ERCP in subgroups of patients
24 hours
Other Outcomes (4)
composite "efficacy-safety" index
30 days
patient satisfaction
30 days
clinician satisfaction
30 days
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Deep Sedation
ACTIVE COMPARATORRemifentanil 1ng/ml throughout the procedure. Propofol administration starts at an initial (estimated plasma) target concentration of 1,5 microg/ml. Propofol administration is adjusted to level 1 or 2 on the modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale. The propofol infusion will be increased stepwise by 0,5 microg/ml every 1 minute until loss of consciousness. Propofol is continued while maintaining spontaneous ventilation without assistance and systolic blood pressure ≥ 60 % of baseline systolic blood pressure.
General Anaesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORGeneral anesthesia will be induced with target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil as in the group "deep sedation". Suxamethonium (succinylcholine) will be used to facilitate intubation. Endotracheal tube balloon pressure will be controlled during the procedure. Ventilation will be assisted using 40% oxygen in air mixture and mechanically controlled using an anaesthetic ventilator.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with scheduled therapeutic ERCP
- Written informed consent for the study protocol obtained from the patient or his/her legal representative
- Anaesthetist available for the procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Mechanically ventilated patients before the procedure
- Baseline oxyhemoglobin saturation \< 90%
- Baseline systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical score 5 (Table 1)
- Age \< 18 years
- Pregnancy
- Emergency procedure
- Absence of fasting ≥ 6 hours for solids and ≥ 2 hours for clear liquids
- Contraindication to any study drug
- Short, thick neck or trismus that may complicate airway rescue
- Previous documented difficult airway intubation
- Obstructive sleep apnea
- Severe swallowing disorders with documented broncho-aspiration
- Bowel obstruction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gastroenterology Department Erasme Hospital
Brussels, 1070, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vincent Huberty, MD
Gastroenterology Department Erasme Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2014
First Posted
January 28, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 13, 2023
Study Completion
February 13, 2023
Last Updated
February 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02