Open-Label Phase IIb Efficacy Trial of Cancer Macrobeads Compared to Best Supportive Care in Colorectal Cancer Patients
A Phase IIb, Nonrandomized, Open-Label Trial With Mouse Renal Adenocarcinoma (RENCA) Cell Containing Agarose-Agarose Macrobeads Compared With Best Supportive Care in Patients With Treatment-Resistant, Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma
2 other identifiers
interventional
70
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This is a clinical research study of an investigational (FDA IND-BB 10091) treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer that no longer responds to standard therapies. The treatment is being evaluated for its effect on tumor growth. It consists of the placement (implantation) of small beads that contain mouse renal adenocarcinoma cells (RENCA macrobeads). The cells in the macrobeads produce substances that have been shown to slow or stop the growth of tumors in experimental animals and veterinary patients. It has been tested in 31 human subjects with different types of cancers in a Phase I safety trial. Phase II studies in patients with colorectal, pancreatic or prostate cancers are in progress
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Apr 2014
Typical duration for phase_2
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 3, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 22, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 22, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 24, 2021
CompletedMarch 24, 2021
February 1, 2021
4.6 years
January 21, 2014
January 8, 2021
February 25, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall Survival
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of RENCA macrobead implantation as assessed by overall survival in subjects with treatment-resistant mCRC.
From date of the most recent scan prior to the first macrobead implantation; assessed up to 32 months.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Performance Status (ECOG Score)
Baseline; Day 14, 30, 60 post-Implant 1; Day 14, 30, 60 post-Implant 2
Activities of Daily Living (KPS Score)
Baseline; Day 14, 30, 60 post-Implant 1; Day 14, 30, 60 post-Implant 2
Global Health Status
Baseline; Day 14, 30, 60 post-Implant 1; Day 14, 30, 60 post-Implant 2
Physical Function
Baseline; Day 14, 30, 60 post-Implant 1; Day 14, 30, 60 post-Implant 2
Role Function
Baseline; Day 14, 30, 60 post-Implant 1; Day 14, 30, 60 post-Implant 2
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Tumor Marker Response (CEA and CA 19-9)
Change from baseline up to and including day 90 post-Implant 1.
Overall Survival by Tumor Marker Response
30 months
Necrosis Comparison of Tumors Using PET-CT Scan
Day 90 post-Implant 1
Study Arms (2)
Macrobead Implantation Arm
EXPERIMENTALpatients who will undergo up to 4 implantations of RENCA macrobeads (no less than 3 months apart), at an amount of 8 RENCA macrobeads per kilogram of body weight
Best Supportive Care Arm
NO INTERVENTIONpatients who will receive, or continue receiving, best supportive care, defined as management of symptoms aimed at maintaining or improving quality of life, but not including approved therapies targeting the patient's malignancy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients in both treatment groups must meet all of the following criteria to be considered eligible to participate in the study:
- Adult men or women, aged 18 years or older, with histologically-confirmed, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum that has been proven to be resistant to available treatment options, including at least 2 such options from available chemotherapy, targeted, and/or other regimens.
- Radiographic evidence of disease progression.
- Life expectancy of at least 6 weeks, in the investigator's opinion, at the time disease progression is documented.
- Considered surgical candidates on the basis of co-morbidity risks, number and sites of metastases, and ability to undergo general anesthesia.
- Able to understand the risks of experimental therapy and provide written consent by signing the appropriate form.
- Patients in Group A must also meet all of the following additional criteria:
- ECOG performance status score of 0, 1, or 2.
- Adequate hematologic function, defined as follows:
- absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1500 /mL
- hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL
- platelets ≥75,000 /mL
- Adequate hepatic function, defined as follows:
- bilirubin ≤1.5 times the upper limit of normal (x ULN)
- aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤3 x ULN, or ≤5 x ULN if liver metastases are present
- +7 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients in either treatment group who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
- Hepatic blood flow abnormalities, i.e., portal vein hypertension and thrombosis, and/or a large volume of ascites.
- Concurrent cancer of any other type, except skin cancers other than melanoma.
- A positive test result for HIV or any hepatitis other than A at screening.
- Considered by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in the study upon review of medical history, physical examination, or clinical laboratory test results.
- Patients in Group A who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
- Received FDA-approved chemotherapy within 3 weeks of Day 0, or bevacizumab (or similar drugs) within 4 weeks of Day 0, or radiation therapy at any site within 4 weeks of Day 0.
- Investigational anticancer therapy within 4 weeks of Day 0.
- Positive reaction to the skin test for allergy to mouse antigen.
- History of hypersensitivity reaction that, in the opinion of the investigator, poses an increased risk of an allergic reaction to the RENCA macrobeads, particularly any known allergy to murine antigens or body tissues.
- Ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, serious cardiac arrhythmias (with the exception of well controlled atrial fibrillation), active bleeding, or psychiatric illness, or social situations that could interfere with the patient's ability to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Rogosin Institutelead
- Vital Systems Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (4)
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205, United States
Weill Cornell Medical Center / The Rogosin Institute
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Calvary Hospital
The Bronx, New York, 10461, United States
The Ohio State University; OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1228, United States
Related Publications (5)
Smith BH, Gazda LS, Conn BL, Jain K, Asina S, Levine DM, Parker TS, Laramore MA, Martis PC, Vinerean HV, David EM, Qiu S, North AJ, Couto CG, Post GS, Waters DJ, Cordon-Cardo C, Hall RD, Gordon BR, Diehl CH, Stenzel KH, Rubin AL. Hydrophilic agarose macrobead cultures select for outgrowth of carcinoma cell populations that can restrict tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2011 Feb 1;71(3):725-35. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2258. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
PMID: 21266362BACKGROUNDSmith BH, Gazda LS, Conn BL, Jain K, Asina S, Levine DM, Parker TS, Laramore MA, Martis PC, Vinerean HV, David EM, Qiu S, Cordon-Cardo C, Hall RD, Gordon BR, Diehl CH, Stenzel KH, Rubin AL. Three-dimensional culture of mouse renal carcinoma cells in agarose macrobeads selects for a subpopulation of cells with cancer stem cell or cancer progenitor properties. Cancer Res. 2011 Feb 1;71(3):716-24. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2254. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
PMID: 21266363BACKGROUNDGazda LS, Martis PC, Laramore MA, Bautista MA, Dudley A, Vinerean HV, Smith BH. Treatment of agarose-agarose RENCA macrobeads with docetaxel selects for OCT4(+) cells with tumor-initiating capability. Cancer Biol Ther. 2013 Dec;14(12):1147-57. doi: 10.4161/cbt.26455. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
PMID: 24025409BACKGROUNDSmith BH, Parikh T, Andrada ZP, Fahey TJ, Berman N, Wiles M, Nazarian A, Thomas J, Arreglado A, Akahoho E, Wolf DJ, Levine DM, Parker TS, Gazda LS, Ocean AJ. First-in-Human Phase 1 Trial of Agarose Beads Containing Murine RENCA Cells in Advanced Solid Tumors. Cancer Growth Metastasis. 2016 Aug 2;9:9-20. doi: 10.4137/CGM.S39442. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27499645BACKGROUNDSmith BH, Gazda LS, Fahey TJ, Nazarian A, Laramore MA, Martis P, Andrada ZP, Thomas J, Parikh T, Sureshbabu S, Berman N, Ocean AJ, Hall RD, Wolf DJ. Clinical laboratory and imaging evidence for effectiveness of agarose-agarose macrobeads containing stem-like cells derived from a mouse renal adenocarcinoma cell population (RMBs) in treatment-resistant, advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: Evaluation of a biological-systems approach to cancer therapy (U.S. FDA IND-BB 10091; NCT 02046174, NCT 01053013). Chin J Cancer Res. 2018 Feb;30(1):72-83. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.01.08.
PMID: 29545721BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Group B was only able to enroll 3/80 participants planned for the best supportive care management arm of this study. As per Group B investigators, the entry criteria were flagged as being impossible for reliable enrollment. Therefore, the results reported here focus on the Group A participants, those which were implanted with RENCA macrobeads.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Betty-Jane Sloan, Clinical Research Manager
- Organization
- The Rogosin Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas J Fahey, III., M.D.
Weill Cornell Medical Center / New York-Presbyterian Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2014
First Posted
January 27, 2014
Study Start
April 3, 2014
Primary Completion
October 22, 2018
Study Completion
October 22, 2018
Last Updated
March 24, 2021
Results First Posted
March 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share