Can Repair Increase the Useful Life of Composite Resins?
REPCOMP
1 other identifier
observational
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives: The aim of this prospective, randomized, triple-blind cohort study was to assess the longevity of repairs to localized clinical defects in composite restorations that were initially scheduled to be treated with a restoration replacement Methods: 28 patients aged 18 to 80 years with 50 composite restorations were recruited.Restorations with clinically diagnosed secondary caries (Charlie) or undercontoured anatomical form defects (Bravo) were randomly assigned to the Repair (n = 25) or Replacement (n = 25) group, the quality of the restorations was scored according to the modified USPHS criteria. A Wilcoxon test was performed for comparisons between the same groups (CI=0.05). A Friedman test was utilized for multiple comparisons between different years of the same group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Aug 2003
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2014
CompletedJanuary 23, 2014
January 1, 2014
10.4 years
January 21, 2014
January 22, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality composites restorations
up to 10 years
Study Arms (2)
25 composite restorations replaced
25 composite replaced with clinically diagnosed secondary caries (Charlie) or undercontoured anatomical form defects (Bravo)
25 composite repaired
25 composite repaired with clinically diagnosed secondary caries (Charlie) or undercontoured anatomical form defects (Bravo)
Eligibility Criteria
A cohort of 28 patients aged 18 to 80 years (mean 26.5 years) of both females (58%) and males (42%) with 50 composite restorations were recruited at the Operative Dentistry Clinic at the Dental School of the University of Chile
You may qualify if:
- Patients with localized marginal deficiencies of composite restorations that were clinically judged to be suitable for repair, sealing, or refurbishing according to USPHS criteria (Table 1).
- Patients with more than 20 teeth.
- Restorations in functional occlusions with an opposing natural tooth.
- Asymptomatic restored tooth.
- At least one proximal contact area with a neighbouring tooth.
- Patients older than 18 years.
- Patients who agreed and signed the consent form for participating in the study.
- Area out of the restoration´s failure is in good condition.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with contra-indications for regular dental treatment based on their medical history.
- Patients with special aesthetic requirements that could not be solved by repair treatments.
- Patients with xerostomia or taking medication that significantly decreased salivary flow.
- Patients with a high risk of caries.
- Patients with psychiatric or physical diseases, which interfered with oral hygiene.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Eduardo Fernández Godoy
Santiango, Met, 7500505, Chile
Related Publications (6)
Martin J, Fernandez E, Estay J, Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Moncada G. Management of Class I and Class II Amalgam Restorations with Localized Defects: Five-Year Results. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:450260. doi: 10.1155/2013/450260. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
PMID: 23431302RESULTMartin J, Fernandez E, Estay J, Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Moncada G. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):125-33. doi: 10.2341/12-062C. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
PMID: 22788726RESULTFernandez EM, Martin JA, Angel PA, Mjor IA, Gordan VV, Moncada GA. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(2):134-9. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000200008.
PMID: 21537587RESULTMoncada G, Martin J, Fernandez E, Hempel MC, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Apr;140(4):425-32. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0191.
PMID: 19339531RESULTMoncada G, Fernandez E, Martin J, Arancibia C, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):258-64. doi: 10.2341/07-113.
PMID: 18505215RESULTMoncada GC, Martin J, Fernandez E, Vildosola PG, Caamano C, Caro MJ, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial. Gen Dent. 2006 Sep-Oct;54(5):314-8.
PMID: 17004564RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Eduardo Fernández Godoy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2014
First Posted
January 23, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2003
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 23, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-01