Magnamosis First-in-human Study of Feasibility and Safety
Magnamosis
Magnetic Compression Anastomosis (Magnamosis) First-in-human Study of Feasibility and Safety
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Anastomosis of intestine or other viscera currently requires open or laparoscopic surgery and is often the most difficult, time-consuming, and expensive part of many operations. We have developed a device ("Magnamosis") that may create compression anastomoses more easily, quickly, and less expensively than sutures or staples. The Magnamosis device consists of two 23-mm diameter, convex-concave, radially symmetric ring magnets encased in polycarbonate. One magnet is placed in the lumen of each viscus to be joined, the magnets self-align, and a compression anastomosis is achieved by tissue remodeling. We have completed extensive pre-clinical studies in animals and have shown that Magnamosis can be used to accomplish gastrojejunostomy, jejunojejunostomy, duodenal-colostomy, and colo-colostomy safely and effectively using available endoscopic and minimally invasive surgery techniques. We are now conducting a small first-in-human study to obtain clinical data in support of the safety and early feasibility of the Magnamosis device.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedJune 15, 2023
June 1, 2023
3.5 years
January 17, 2014
June 12, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of subjects who experience occurrence of anastomotic leak
Subject follow-up will be performed at postoperation 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months, 1 and 2 years to assess the occurrence of an anastomotic leak
Up to 2 years postoperation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of subjects who experience other device-related complications
Up to 2 years postoperation
Number of patients who have an adequate anastomosis
Up to 2 years postoperation
Study Arms (1)
Magnamosis
EXPERIMENTALCreate an intestinal anastomosis using the Magnamosis Magnetic Compression Anastomosis (Magnamosis) device to re-establish intestinal continuity that would otherwise be performed using sutures or stapling devices
Interventions
Single-use, sterile device enables creation of a circular compression intestinal anastomosis. Device is comprised of matched pair of self-centering rare earth magnets encased in medical grade polycarbonate. Geometry of magnets' mating surfaces applies force on inside of mated rings to produce compression necrosis of intervening intestinal walls. Lesser force on outside of mated rings produces inflammatory healing of the two co-apted intestinal walls. Internal lumen creates patency of the anastomosis to prevent intestinal obstruction during compression anastomosis creation. In 5-10 days, mated rings with necrotic tissue falls into intestinal lumen and is naturally expelled with stool, leaving a well-healed anastomosis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between 18 and ≤ 60 years of age
- Requires non-emergent operation to create an intestinal anastomosis for maintenance of intestinal continuity in which the Magnamosis device can be used instead of sutures or staples.
- Able to read, speak and understand English
- Demonstrates an understanding of the study procedures and risks, and can provide signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Intestines to be anastomosed are not appropriate in size, thickness or tissue health for the Magnamosis device. For example,
- Intestine too small to accommodate 23-mm diameter device; or
- Intestine so large that 23-mm diameter anastomotic lumen is not adequate; or
- Intestine too thickened to allow two halves of device to come together with sufficient force to produce compression anastomosis (e.g. inflamed or scarred intestinal wall; a foreign body like staples in anastomosis); or
- Inadequate blood supply
- Requires anastomosis of the stomach
- Bowel is not well perfused
- Anastomosis will be under tension
- Anatomic reconstruction requires crossing a staple line
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score 4 or 5;
- Requires more than one anastomosis during operation;
- Women possibly or known to be pregnant;
- Inability to obtain pre-authorization from insurance company or third party payor
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Michael Harrisonlead
- University of California, San Franciscocollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of California, San Francisco - Parnassus Campus
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
UCSF-Mission Bay
San Francisco, California, 94158, United States
Related Publications (5)
Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG, Pichakron KO, Harrison MR. Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jan;44(1):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.044.
PMID: 19159747BACKGROUNDPichakron KO, Jelin EB, Hirose S, Curran PF, Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Fechter R, Strange M, Harrison MR. Magnamosis II: Magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jan;212(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.031.
PMID: 21184956BACKGROUNDGonzales KD, Douglas G, Pichakron KO, Kwiat DA, Gallardo SG, Encinas JL, Hirose S, Harrison MR. Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jun;47(6):1291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.042.
PMID: 22703808BACKGROUNDWall J, Diana M, Leroy J, Deruijter V, Gonzales KD, Lindner V, Harrison M, Marescaux J. MAGNAMOSIS IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Endoscopy. 2013 Aug;45(8):643-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344119. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
PMID: 23807805BACKGROUNDGraves CE, Co C, Hsi RS, Kwiat D, Imamura-Ching J, Harrison MR, Stoller ML. Magnetic Compression Anastomosis (Magnamosis): First-In-Human Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Nov;225(5):676-681.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.07.1062. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
PMID: 28843832RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael R Harrison, MD
UCSF Professor Emeritus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2014
First Posted
January 23, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share