Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for BMI 27-32 Type 2 Diabetes Versus Best Medical Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Investigators aim to show that Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) is superior to best medical treatment in reaching well-defined treatment end points in Asian subjects of BMI 27-32 with type 2 Diabetes (DM2). Investigators also hope to show that successful RYGB will reduce resource utilization in the near term with similar projected reduction over the medium to long term.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedJune 23, 2022
June 1, 2022
6.8 years
January 10, 2014
June 22, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of subjects achieving HBA1c of 6% without diabetic medication
The primary endpoint is to compare Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) vs best medical treatment for Asian subjects of BMI 27-32 with poorly controlled type 2 Diabetes (DM2) in achieving a glycated haemoglobin level of 6% or less at 12 months after randomisation, and beyond till the end of the study period, without diabetic medications; and also systolic Blood Pressure of \<130 mm HG, and LDL of \<100mg/dl.
at 12 month after randomisation
Number of subjects achieving systolic BP <130mm hg without antihypertension medication
The primary endpoint is to compare Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) vs best medical treatment for Asian subjects of BMI 27-32 with poorly controlled type 2 Diabetes (DM2) in achieving a glycated haemoglobin level of 6% or less at 12 months after randomisation, and beyond till the end of the study period, without diabetic medications; and also systolic Blood Pressure of \<130 mm HG, and LDL of \<100mg/dl.
12 months post randomisation
number of subjects achieving LDL level of <100mg/dl without lipid lowering medication
The primary endpoint is to compare Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) vs best medical treatment for Asian subjects of BMI 27-32 with poorly controlled type 2 Diabetes (DM2) in achieving a glycated haemoglobin level of 6% or less at 12 months after randomisation, and beyond till the end of the study period, without diabetic medications; and also systolic Blood Pressure of \<130 mm HG, and LDL of \<100mg/dl.
12 months post randomisation
Secondary Outcomes (13)
fasting plasma glucose
12 months after Randomisation
Fasting Insulin
12 months after radomisation
serum c-peptide level
12 months post randomisation
serum lipid levels
12 months post randomisation
C-reactive protein level
12 months post randolmisation
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) as per standard surgical protocol, with a 30 cc gastric pouch, 50 cm biliopancreatic limb and 100cm gastrointestinal limb.
Best Medical Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnti-diabetic medications provided (Mono- or Combination- therapy): Incretin analogues: Liraglutide up to 3 mg daily Or DPP-4 Inhibitors: Sitagliptin up to 100 mg daily, Linagliptin up to 5mg daily Xenical: Up to 120 mg tds SGLT2 inhibitors: Empagliflozin up to 25mg daily, Canagliflozin up to 300mg daily Participants will also take lipids \& BP medications according to standard of care.
Interventions
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) as per standard surgical protocol, with a 30 cc gastric pouch, 50 cm biliopancreatic limb and 100cm gastrointestinal limb.
Incretin analogues: Liraglutide up to 1.8 mg daily
SGLT2 inhibitors: Empagliflozin up to 25mg daily, Canagliflozin up to 300mg daily
Sitagliptin up to 100 mg daily, Linagliptin up to 5mg daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Established diagnosis of DM2 = or \< 10 years
- Age 21-65
- BMI 27-32.
- HBA1c ≥ 8%, on maximum treatment from primary care physician
- At least one of the following co-morbidities on treatment: hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, micro/macro-proteinuria or ≤class I nephropathy, retinopathy.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who had previous Bariatric surgery or extensive upper abdominal surgery
- Pregnant subjects.
- Nephropathy requiring dialysis
- Subjects who are not fit for general anaesthesia.
- Subjects who are unsuitable for RYGB for whatever reason, medical/surgical/psychological.
- Subjects who are unwilling or possibly unable to participate in the follow up process.
- Subjects who are reluctant to be randomised into the two study groups.
- Subjects who suffers from unstable psychiatric illness
- Subjects who are active substance abusers
- Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody positive.
- fasting C-peptide \< 300 pmol/L
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Khoo Teck Puat Hospital
Singapore, 768828, Singapore
Related Publications (9)
Colquitt JL, Picot J, Loveman E, Clegg AJ. Surgery for obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub3.
PMID: 19370590BACKGROUNDBuchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Jensen MD, Pories WJ, Bantle JP, Sledge I. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009 Mar;122(3):248-256.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.041.
PMID: 19272486BACKGROUNDSjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, Lystig T, Sullivan M, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Bengtsson C, Dahlgren S, Gummesson A, Jacobson P, Karlsson J, Lindroos AK, Lonroth H, Naslund I, Olbers T, Stenlof K, Torgerson J, Agren G, Carlsson LM; Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):741-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066254.
PMID: 17715408BACKGROUNDDixon JB, Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Rubino F; International Diabetes Federation Taskforce on Epidemiology and Prevention. Bariatric surgery: an IDF statement for obese Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011 Jun;28(6):628-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03306.x.
PMID: 21480973BACKGROUNDPories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, Long SB, Morris PG, Brown BM, Barakat HA, deRamon RA, Israel G, Dolezal JM, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995 Sep;222(3):339-50; discussion 350-2. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00011.
PMID: 7677463BACKGROUNDSchauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE, Thomas S, Abood B, Nissen SE, Bhatt DL. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1567-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200225. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
PMID: 22449319BACKGROUNDMingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Leccesi L, Nanni G, Pomp A, Castagneto M, Ghirlanda G, Rubino F. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1577-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200111. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
PMID: 22449317BACKGROUNDCohen RV, Pinheiro JC, Schiavon CA, Salles JE, Wajchenberg BL, Cummings DE. Effects of gastric bypass surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes and only mild obesity. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jul;35(7):1420-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2289.
PMID: 22723580BACKGROUNDCheng A, Yeoh E, Moh A, Low S, Tan CH, Lam B, Sum CF, Subramaniam T, Lim SC. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus best medical treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults with body mass index between 27 and 32 kg/m2: A 5-year randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jun;188:109900. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109900. Epub 2022 May 2.
PMID: 35513159DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anton Cheng, MBBS
Khoo Teck Puat Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Su Chi Lim, MBBS, PhD
Khoo Teck Puat Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr Anton Cheng
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2014
First Posted
January 22, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
June 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share