NCT02033031

Brief Summary

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second leading cause of retinal vascular disease in patients older than 50 years.The prevalence varies from 0.7% to 1.6% in the literature. Visual recovery depends on ischemic damage of the retina, the occurence of macular edema (ME) and the development of neovascular glaucoma. The occurence of ME is the main reason for visual loss and frustrates visual recovery among patients with both central or branch RVO. Therapeutic options that have been used and discussed over the years are the treatment with anticoagulants, fibrinolytics, corticosteroids, acetazolamide and isovolemic haemodilution. Furthermore, surgical options like vitrectomy and radial optic neurotomy were used. Panretinal photocoagulation and grid pattern photocoagulation had established as additional tool to induce chorioretinal anastomosis. Nevertheless, the effectiveness and the evidence of these different treatment options could not be verified and remains mostly unknown. Nowadays, intravitreal anti-VEGF application had become the treatment of choice for ME secondary to RVO. Multi-center studies have already shown the effectiveness of anti-VEGF treatment to reduce intraretinal fluid and retinal hemorrhages (BRAVO, CRUISE). Unfortunately, often high numbers of re-treatments become necessary over the years. In our knowledge, there are no reports showing more than 3 years treatment effects of antiangiogenic drugs in patients with BRVO. However, the results of treatment effect longer than 3 years are important, as the mean age \< 70 years with an onset of BRVO has been estimated in about 60% of all cases. In addition, most patients with regard to the application of anti-VEGF treatment in real clinical setting, there is only rare experience concerning need of optimum time duration for follow-up at the departments. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes, safety and therapeutic benefit of a flexible dosing regimen of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in patients with ME secondary to BRVO.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
28

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2013

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 2, 2014

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 10, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

January 10, 2014

Status Verified

January 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 2, 2014

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

branch retinal vein occlusioncentral retinal thicknessvisual acuitycentral reintal sensitivity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • visual acuity

    measurement of visual acuity outcomes; baseline in comparison to long-term

    up to 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • retinal sensitivity

    up to 6 months

  • central retinal thickness

    up to 6 months

  • treatment rate

    up to 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Lucentis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

PRN intravitreal injection of Lucentis

Drug: Lucentis intravitreal injection

Avastin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

PRN intravitreal injection of Lucentis

Drug: Avastin intravitreal injection

Interventions

Lucentis intravitreal injection

Lucentis

Avastin intravitreal injection

Avastin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Macular edema secondary to Branch retinal vein occlusion

You may not qualify if:

  • Aphakia, Glaucoma

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, Austria

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Retinal Vein Occlusion

Interventions

RanibizumabBevacizumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Retinal DiseasesEye DiseasesVenous ThrombosisThrombosisEmbolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Study Officials

  • Stefan Sacu, Prof.

    Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2014

First Posted

January 10, 2014

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion

November 1, 2012

Study Completion

February 1, 2013

Last Updated

January 10, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-01

Locations