Comparison of VF Induction Techniques During Medtronic ICD Implant (VF) (ICD)
VF
Comparison of Ventricular Fibrillation Induction Techniques During Medtronic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implant
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
As the indications for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator implantation expand, minimizing implant time is critical. Also, patients receiving biventricular ICDs are sometimes more unstable and minimization of sedation time is crucial. Multiple induction attempts, with a 1-Joule shock, can cause disruption in lead position. Therefore limiting the number of attempts will allow for better lead stability throughout the procedure and a more straightforward implant process. Investigator proposes a detailed documentation of success rates from various Ventriculart Fibrillation induction methods during implant of Medtronic defibrillation capable devices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 31, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 30, 2014
CompletedMay 22, 2018
April 1, 2018
1.6 years
December 31, 2013
June 24, 2014
April 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sustained Ventricular Fibrillation
The primary endpoint is the successful induction of sustained ventricular fibrillation.
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Factors
2 hours
Other Outcomes (1)
Safety Monitoring
2 hours
Study Arms (2)
Nominal Parameter
ACTIVE COMPARATORNominal T shock setting
Experimental Parameter
EXPERIMENTALEducated T shock setting
Interventions
Nominal Parameter Set 1 Programming Values for EnTrust
Experimental Parameter Set 2 Programming Values
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients undergoing Medtronic ICD or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator implant (initial implant or generator replacement) will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Any patient who is medically unstable and testing is deemed unsafe by physician will be excluded from this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- James Merrilllead
- Medtroniccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Wellmont CVA Heart Institute
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660, United States
Related Publications (5)
Bardy G, Mehra R, Johnson G, Kudenchuk P, Dolack G, Poole J, Hofer B: Low energy pulsing on the T-wave: A new programming method for intentional, device mediated induction of ventricular fibrillation for defibrillation testing. PACE 15(4, Pt II): 562, 1992.
BACKGROUNDBhandari AK, Isber N, Estioko M, Ziccardi T, Cannom DS, Park Y, Lerman RD, Prejean C, Sun GW. Efficacy of low-energy T wave shocks for induction of ventricular fibrillation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. J Electrocardiol. 1998 Jan;31(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(98)90004-8.
PMID: 9533375BACKGROUNDMarquis DR Reference Manual, Medtronic, Inc.
BACKGROUNDMitchell L, Yee R, Talajic M, Newman D, Sheldon R, Kerr C, Kus T, Boyle A, Canadian Jewel PCD Investigators: Low-energy, T-wave synchronous, interval shock for rapid, reliable ventricular fibrillation induction by an implantable cardioverter defibrllattor. PACE, 17(4, Pt II): 851, 1994.
BACKGROUNDSwartz J, Stanton M, DeGroot P, Mehra R: Influence of T-wave shock energy on ventricular fibrillation vulnerability in humans. JACC 1995 Conference Abstracts: 214A, 1995.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Terrie Walker, Director of Clinical Research
- Organization
- Wellmont CVA Heart Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- James Merrill, MD, FACC
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 31, 2013
First Posted
January 6, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 22, 2018
Results First Posted
December 30, 2014
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share