Comparison of Lormetazepam and Midazolam Used as Sedatives for Patients That Require Intensive Care
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
3
Brief Summary
A goal directed , demand-driven administration of sedative drugs is an integral part of every intensive care treatment. During long-term application of sedatives, Midazolam is the most commonly used sedative in Europe. One major objective is the problem of oversedation and agitation during an intensive care treatment due to the lack of controllability of available substances. The Love-Mi RCT investigates the clinical controllability of Midazolam versus the newly available intravenous drug Lormetazepam.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jul 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_4
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 17, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 12, 2020
CompletedApril 13, 2022
April 1, 2022
5.4 years
December 12, 2013
April 8, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Controllability of sedation
Controllability of sedation is defined as the percentage share of measures where the actual depth of sedation (measured with the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale) (RASS)) matches the target depths of sedation. The individual sedation target is defined by the attending physician. . It will be measured until 5 days after terminationduring administration of study drug until 2 hours after its termination.
Up to 50 hours
Secondary Outcomes (25)
SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment)
Up to 8 days
Pain-Scores
Up to 28 days
Anxiety-Score
Up to 28 days
Concurrent medication for Analgesia and Sedation
Up to 8 days
Delirium-screening-Instruments
Up to 28 days
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lormetazepam
EXPERIMENTALThe patient is treated on ICU not longer than 2 days. Dosage requirements according to Summary of product characteristics (Sedalam®).
Midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient is treated on ICU not longer than 2 days. Dosage requirements according to Summary of product characteristics (Midazolam-ratiopharm®, Midazolam-hameln®).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mechanically ventilated ICU patients with the need for sedatives to achieve or maintain the intended target-RASS (surgical/ nonsurgical).
- Age ≥ 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Continuous administration of benzodiazepines within the last 7 days before start of study drug application
- Titration phase: No way that a target RASS between -3 and 0 can be determined by the attending physician
- Known drug intolerance or allergy against lormetazepam, midazolam or one of the additional components.
- Addictive disorder
- Increased intracranial pressure
- Acute intoxication with alcohol, analgesics, sedatives, antipsychotics (neuroleptics, anti-depressives, lithium).
- Patients with cerebrale Pathology, which changes the controllability of sedation or die consciousness (e.g. patients known mental retardation due to syndromatic disorders or an infantile brain damage)
- Patients with a suspected or secured hypoxic brain damage
- Patients with intracranial surgery during actual hospital care
- Tetraplegic patients
- Myasthenia Gravis
- Cerebellar or spinal Ataxia
- Moribund patients with an expected lifespan of less than 24 hours.
- Sickle cell anaemia
- Thallassemia
- +9 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Claudia Spieslead
Study Sites (3)
Clinic for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Painmanagement, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-University
Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, 60590, Germany
Clinic for Operative Intensive Care Medicine and Intermediate Care, University of RWTH
Aachen, 52056, Germany
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - University Medicine
Berlin, 13353, Germany
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Claudia Spies, MD, Univ.- Prof.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Gernot Marx, MD, Univ.-Prof.
University RWTH Aachen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. C. Spies
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2013
First Posted
December 30, 2013
Study Start
July 17, 2014
Primary Completion
December 12, 2019
Study Completion
March 12, 2020
Last Updated
April 13, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04