NCT02018679

Brief Summary

Topical photodynamic therapy with methyl-aminolaevulinate (MAL-PDT) has been introduced as an alternatively attractive procedure for BCC. Er:YAG ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatment removes the stratum corneum to increase MAL uptake and may improve efficacy. However, no studies have directly compared the efficacy of Er:YAG AFL-PDT and MAL-PDT in treating nodular BCC in Asians.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2011

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2011

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 29, 2013

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 23, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

December 23, 2013

Status Verified

December 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

November 29, 2013

Last Update Submit

December 17, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Nodular basal cell carcinomaEr:YAGAFL-assistedMAL-PDT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference the efficacy between Er:YAG AFL-PDT and MAL-PDT

    Lesion responses were classified as either a complete response (complete disappearance of the lesion) or a non-complete response (incomplete disappearance)

    Efficacy was evaluated at 3 months and 12 months after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference of the cosmetic outcomes between Er:YAG AFL-PDT and MAL-PDT treatment

    Cosmetic outcome was assessed by each investigator for all lesions that achieved a complete response at 3 or 12 months

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Difference of the recurrence rates between Er:YAG AFL-PDT and MAL-PDT

    recurrence rates were evaluated at 12 months after the last treatment.

  • Difference of the safety between Er:YAG AFL-PDT and MAL-PDT

    Safety assessments were performed at the end of the 3-hour cream application; after the illumination during each treatment session; and at 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months after the last treatment

Study Arms (2)

Er:YAG AFL-PDT

EXPERIMENTAL

AFL was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG ablative fractional laser (Joule, Sciton Inc., CA, UA) at 550-600 µm ablation in depth, level 1 coagulation, 22% treatment density, and a single pulse. Immediately afterwards, a 1-mm thick layer of MAL (16% Metvix® cream, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm, 3M, Saint Paul, MN, US) for 3 hours, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light. Each treatment area was then separately illuminated with red light-emitting diode (LED) lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma, Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and total light dose of 37 J cm2.

Procedure: Er:YAG AFL-PDT

MAL-PDT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Immediately afterwards, a 1-mm thick layer of MAL (16% Metvix® cream, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm, 3M, Saint Paul, MN, US) for 3 hours, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light. Each treatment area was then separately illuminated with red light-emitting diode (LED) lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma, Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and total light dose of 37 J cm2. Areas which were scheduled to receive MAL-PDT received the second treatment 7 days later.

Procedure: MAL-PDT

Interventions

AFL was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG ablative fractional laser (Joule, Sciton Inc., CA, UA) at 550-600 µm ablation in depth, level 1 coagulation, 22% treatment density, and a single pulse. Immediately afterwards, a 1-mm thick layer of MAL (16% Metvix® cream, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm, 3M, Saint Paul, MN, US) for 3 hours, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light. Each treatment area was then separately illuminated with red light-emitting diode (LED) lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma, Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and total light dose of 37 J cm2.

Er:YAG AFL-PDT
MAL-PDTPROCEDURE

a 1-mm thick layer of MAL (16% Metvix® cream, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm, 3M, Saint Paul, MN, US) for 3 hours, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light. Each treatment area was then separately illuminated with red light-emitting diode (LED) lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma, Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and total light dose of 37 J cm2. Areas which were scheduled to receive MAL-PDT received the second treatment 7 days later.

MAL-PDT

Eligibility Criteria

Age38 Years - 78 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patient's request for alternative treatment due to the lower cosmetic outcomes of surgery
  • difficulty to surgical excision due to bleeding abnormalities or cardiac problems

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with more than 5 eligible lesions
  • lesions deeper than 2mm in depth
  • lesions located in the midface region, nose, orbital areas, and ears
  • lesions with a longest diameter of less than 6 mm or more than 15mm
  • infiltrative BCC
  • morpheaform BCC
  • known allergies to the MAL cream or lidocaine
  • pregnancy
  • lactation
  • any active systemic infectious disease
  • immunosuppressive treatment
  • personal history of malignant melanoma
  • tendency towards melasma or keloid formation
  • prior treatment of the lesions within 4 weeks
  • any indication of poor compliance

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dong-A University

Busan, Seo-gu, 602-715, South Korea

Location

Study Officials

  • Ki-Hoon Song, M.D., Ph.D.

    Dong-A University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor and chairman, Department of dermatology Dong-A University, College of medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2013

First Posted

December 23, 2013

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

September 1, 2013

Last Updated

December 23, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-12

Locations