Er:YAG Ablative Fractional Laser Assisted-Photodynamic Therapy Versus Photodynamic Therapy for Basal Cell Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Topical photodynamic therapy with methyl-aminolaevulinate (MAL-PDT) has been introduced as an alternatively attractive procedure for BCC. Er:YAG ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatment removes the stratum corneum to increase MAL uptake and may improve efficacy. However, no studies have directly compared the efficacy of Er:YAG AFL-PDT and MAL-PDT in treating nodular BCC in Asians.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Mar 2011
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2013
CompletedDecember 23, 2013
December 1, 2013
1.9 years
November 29, 2013
December 17, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference the efficacy between Er:YAG AFL-PDT and MAL-PDT
Lesion responses were classified as either a complete response (complete disappearance of the lesion) or a non-complete response (incomplete disappearance)
Efficacy was evaluated at 3 months and 12 months after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Difference of the cosmetic outcomes between Er:YAG AFL-PDT and MAL-PDT treatment
Cosmetic outcome was assessed by each investigator for all lesions that achieved a complete response at 3 or 12 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Difference of the recurrence rates between Er:YAG AFL-PDT and MAL-PDT
recurrence rates were evaluated at 12 months after the last treatment.
Difference of the safety between Er:YAG AFL-PDT and MAL-PDT
Safety assessments were performed at the end of the 3-hour cream application; after the illumination during each treatment session; and at 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months after the last treatment
Study Arms (2)
Er:YAG AFL-PDT
EXPERIMENTALAFL was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG ablative fractional laser (Joule, Sciton Inc., CA, UA) at 550-600 µm ablation in depth, level 1 coagulation, 22% treatment density, and a single pulse. Immediately afterwards, a 1-mm thick layer of MAL (16% Metvix® cream, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm, 3M, Saint Paul, MN, US) for 3 hours, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light. Each treatment area was then separately illuminated with red light-emitting diode (LED) lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma, Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and total light dose of 37 J cm2.
MAL-PDT
ACTIVE COMPARATORImmediately afterwards, a 1-mm thick layer of MAL (16% Metvix® cream, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm, 3M, Saint Paul, MN, US) for 3 hours, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light. Each treatment area was then separately illuminated with red light-emitting diode (LED) lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma, Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and total light dose of 37 J cm2. Areas which were scheduled to receive MAL-PDT received the second treatment 7 days later.
Interventions
AFL was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG ablative fractional laser (Joule, Sciton Inc., CA, UA) at 550-600 µm ablation in depth, level 1 coagulation, 22% treatment density, and a single pulse. Immediately afterwards, a 1-mm thick layer of MAL (16% Metvix® cream, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm, 3M, Saint Paul, MN, US) for 3 hours, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light. Each treatment area was then separately illuminated with red light-emitting diode (LED) lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma, Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and total light dose of 37 J cm2.
a 1-mm thick layer of MAL (16% Metvix® cream, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm, 3M, Saint Paul, MN, US) for 3 hours, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light. Each treatment area was then separately illuminated with red light-emitting diode (LED) lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma, Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and total light dose of 37 J cm2. Areas which were scheduled to receive MAL-PDT received the second treatment 7 days later.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patient's request for alternative treatment due to the lower cosmetic outcomes of surgery
- difficulty to surgical excision due to bleeding abnormalities or cardiac problems
You may not qualify if:
- patients with more than 5 eligible lesions
- lesions deeper than 2mm in depth
- lesions located in the midface region, nose, orbital areas, and ears
- lesions with a longest diameter of less than 6 mm or more than 15mm
- infiltrative BCC
- morpheaform BCC
- known allergies to the MAL cream or lidocaine
- pregnancy
- lactation
- any active systemic infectious disease
- immunosuppressive treatment
- personal history of malignant melanoma
- tendency towards melasma or keloid formation
- prior treatment of the lesions within 4 weeks
- any indication of poor compliance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dong-A University
Busan, Seo-gu, 602-715, South Korea
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ki-Hoon Song, M.D., Ph.D.
Dong-A University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor and chairman, Department of dermatology Dong-A University, College of medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2013
First Posted
December 23, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
December 23, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-12