NCT02018484

Brief Summary

Unicompartmental knee replacements are performed to treat osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis of the knee especially when it affects only the medial femoro-tibial compartment. To place the prosthesis, bone removal is necessary. The orientations of the bony cuts directly influence the position of the different elements of the prosthesis and the limb alignment. It is known that good positioning of the prosthesis is the key of a good survival of the implants. To guide the blade of the saw, cutting guides are used. The position of these guides gives the final position of the cuts. At present, two main techniques are used to position the guides: the conventional one, not very costly but not very accurate, and the navigated procedure, which is more accurate but also more expensive and more invasive. Since few years, patient specific cutting guides are used in total knee replacement with encouraging results and more recently in uni compartmental knee replacement with no scientific proof of efficiency. This study aims to validate the procedure of patient specific cutting guides.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2013

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 9, 2013

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 23, 2013

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

August 19, 2016

Status Verified

March 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

December 9, 2013

Last Update Submit

August 18, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Surgery / Knee / Replacement / MRI / Specific cutting guides

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Success rate in performing the tibial cut

    Success is defined as a correct orientation of the tibial cut which has to be within patient's target value (± 2°) at 6 months in both the frontal and the sagittal plans. Failure of prosthesis implantation (defined by outranging patient's target value of more than 4º in the frontal or the sagittal plan or more than 3 mm on the cutting depth, controled by per operative navigated procedure) is considered as treatment failure.

    Month 6

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Success rate in conserving a residual varus.

    Month 6

  • Variations of other orientation parameters of the tibial cut and limb alignment at the different times of the procedure (per and post operative) .

    Per-operative, and Month 6

Study Arms (1)

Patient specific cutting guides

EXPERIMENTAL

Unicompartmental knee replacement with patient specific cutting guides

Procedure: Unicompartmental Knee Replacement

Interventions

Patient specific cutting guides

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients aged 18 or older;
  • indication of medial unicompartmental knee replacement (validated by the orthopedic surgeons staff) ;
  • written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • MRI contraindication ;
  • Absence of the main investigator or the associated scientist during the surgical procedure ;
  • Adults under legal protective regimen or deprived of liberty.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chu Rennes

Rennes, 35000, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplastyOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativePlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis Implantation

Study Officials

  • Jean-Christophe Lambotte, MD

    Rennes University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Bruno Laviolle, MD, PhD

    CIC INSERM 0203 CHU de RENNES

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2013

First Posted

December 23, 2013

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion

May 1, 2016

Study Completion

May 1, 2016

Last Updated

August 19, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-03

Locations