NCT02018107

Brief Summary

In this research study, the investigators are evaluating whether ammonia PET scans or FDG PET perfusion scans are more useful in helping radiologists determine whether liver tumors were successfully destroyed by the heating or freezing procedures (ablations) than other scans currently available to radiologists, such as CT scans and MRI scans. The currently available scan (usually a CT scan with contrast dye) is not always effective in showing how completely the tumor has been destroyed. The ammonia PET scan is a different way of looking at how much tumor has been destroyed. This study will compare the standard scan (CT scan) with the ammonia PET scan.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
33

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 23, 2013

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 16, 2018

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 16, 2019

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 26, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 26, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4.1 years

First QC Date

December 17, 2013

Results QC Date

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 4, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Liver Tumor AblationLiver NeoplasmsPositron Emission TomographyComputed Tomography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number and Percentage of Tumors With Complete, Circumferential Ablation Margin Visibility During FDG PET/CT-guided Liver Ablations (AP-PET-1 v. Contrast-enhanced MRI)

    For FDG-avid tumors, compare the rates of complete, circumferential ablation margin visibility during FDG PET/CT-guided liver ablations using two imaging techniques: intra-procedural AP-PET-1(research scan #1) and post-procedural contrast enhanced MRI . Discordance rates for complete ablation margin visibility between the two imaging techniques will be calculated.

    2 Years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Does an Inadequate Ablation Margin on PET Predict Local Progression? Compare to MRI?

    2 Years

Study Arms (1)

N-13 ammonia to image liver PET perfusion

EXPERIMENTAL

This single-arm study involves the non-therapeutic administration of a radiopharmaceutical, N-13 ammonia or F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose, one to two doses, during the tumor ablation procedure. The N-13 ammonia perfusion PET scan is a diagnostic imaging test. The tumor ablation procedure is performed according to our standard clinical practice and is not itself a research activity. The use of N-13 ammonia to image liver perfusion with a PET scanner is the research portion of the procedure. The participant will receive one or two IV doses of N-13 ammonia (10 mCi/dose) for intraprocedural assessment of ablation results. Not more than two doses will be administered and one or both doses will be administered on the day of the tumor ablation procedure only

Diagnostic Test: N-13 ammonia or F-18 fluorodeoxyglucoseDiagnostic Test: PET scan

Interventions

PET tracer

N-13 ammonia to image liver PET perfusion
PET scanDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

PET scan

N-13 ammonia to image liver PET perfusion

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults, 18 years or older
  • Referral from an internist, oncologist, or surgeon for liver tumor ablation consultation
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Performance Status \< 3
  • Liver tumor ablation judged to be appropriate based on clinical assessment in the BWH (Brigham \& Women's Hospital) Tumor Ablation Clinic by the tumor ablation interventional radiologist, per standard clinical practice
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

You may not qualify if:

  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy (due to bleeding risk)
  • Pulmonary disease precluding monitored anesthesia care or general anesthesia
  • Severe renal insufficiency, EGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) \< 30
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, significant cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Childs-Pugh Class C cirrhosis
  • Occlusive main portal vein thrombosis
  • Presence of biliary-enteric anastomosis (due to risk of biliary infection)
  • Pregnant women are excluded (because both CT and PET/CT scans involve the use of ionizing radiation which may pose a potential teratogenic effect on the fetus.)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Shyn PB, Cubre AJ, Catalano PJ, Lee LK, Hyun H, Tuncali K, Seol JG, Levesque VM, Gerbaudo VH, Kapur T, Chao RT, Silverman SG. F-18 FDG perfusion PET: intraprocedural assessment of the liver tumor ablation margin. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jul;46(7):3437-3447. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-02970-8. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver Neoplasms

Interventions

Positron-Emission Tomography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tomography, Emission-ComputedImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisImage EnhancementPhotographyRadionuclide ImagingTomographyDiagnostic Techniques, Radioisotope

Results Point of Contact

Title
Paul Shyn, MD
Organization
Brigham & Women's Hospital INC

Study Officials

  • Paul B. Shyn, M.D.

    Brigham and Women's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a diagnostic imaging study, involving FDA-approved radiopharmaceuticals. Applying a "Phase" to the study is N/A, even though the Study Phase had to be entered above.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2013

First Posted

December 23, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

February 16, 2018

Study Completion

February 16, 2019

Last Updated

March 26, 2020

Results First Posted

March 26, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Locations