Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Monoprost® in Comparison With Lumigan® 0.01 % and Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose
2 other identifiers
interventional
379
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Primary objective: The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of Monoprost® versus Lumigan® 0.01% and Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose in term of safety with respect to the assessment of conjunctival hyperaemia in the worse eye at Day 84. The conjunctival hyperaemia will be scored using the MacMonnies photographic scale (0 to 5).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Dec 2013
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 2, 2020
CompletedApril 2, 2020
February 1, 2020
2.6 years
December 2, 2013
March 30, 2018
March 20, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Safety With Respect to the Assessment of Conjunctival Hyperaemia in the Worse Eye
The primary endpoint is the change from baseline of conjunctival hyperaemia assessed on MacMonnies' 6 point ordinal scale, in the worse eye at the D84 visit. The primary statistical hypothesis tested is that Monoprost® is superior to Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose with regard to this primary endpoint, i.e. that in the worse eye the decrease from baseline in the MacMonnies 6 point ordinal scale is greater in the Monoprost® treated group than in the Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose group at the Day 84 visit. The conjunctival hyperaemia will be scored using the "McMonnies" photographic scale (0 to 5). The minimum score is 0 corresponding to a low hyperaemia and the maximum score is 5 corresponding to a higher hyperaemia. The Rows represent the number of participants with a change from Baseline to D84 corresponding to * "decrease of 3 points" * "decrease of 2 points" * "no change", * "increase of 2 points" * "increase of 1 point" on Mc Monnies scale
Day 84
Study Arms (3)
Monoprost
EXPERIMENTAL1 drop in each eye once daily at 9.00 pm (± 1 hour) for 3 months.
Lumigan 0.01%
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1 drop in each eye once daily at 9.00 pm (± 1 hour) for 3 months.
Lumigan 0.03% Unit Dose
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1 drop in each eye once daily at 9.00 pm (± 1 hour) for 3 months.
Interventions
Monoprost®: Latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic preparation is a sterile unpreserved oil-based solution for topical ophthalmic use. It is supplied in 0.30 ml single use polyethylene containers. The batch numbers and reanalysis dates will be stated in the certificate of analysis.
Lumigan® 0.01%: Bimatoprost eye drop solution is supplied in 3 ml multidose container.
Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose: Bimatoprost eye drop solution is supplied in 0.4 ml single use low density polyethylene (LDPE) containers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female aged ≥18 years old.
- Written informed consent.
- Association of the 3 following criteria:
- Both eyes have primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension already treated and controlled by mono-therapy of Lumigan® 0.01% since at least 3 months (according to European Glaucoma Society guidelines).
- Intra Ocular Pressure ≤ 18 mm Hg in both eyes.
- With local intolerance signs in at least one eye defined by the association of:
- Hyperaemia = Grade (2) or (3) or (4) following the photographic MacMonnies scale.
- And 3.2.1 Presence of at least 2 symptoms with a level of severity ≥ 1 (= mild or moderate or severe) among the following 5 symptoms: irritation/burning, itching, tearing, eye dryness sensation, foreign body sensation.
- And/Or 3.2.2 Presence of at least 2 signs with a level of severity ≥ 1 (= mild or moderate or severe) among the following 3 signs: superficial punctate keratitis, blepharitis, eyelid skin darkness.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Presence of at least one severe objective sign among the following:
- Global ocular staining with Oxford (0-15) grading scheme \>12.
- Blepharitis (Grade 4: Very severe, i.e. eczematiform lesion).
- Any ocular hypertension other than primary ocular hypertension or primary chronic open angle glaucoma (such as congenital, angle closure glaucoma, secondary glaucoma).
- Advanced stage of glaucoma:
- Absolute defect in the ten degrees central point of the visual field.
- Severe visual field loss according to the investigator's best judgement.
- Risk of visual field worsening as a consequence of participation in the trial according to the investigator's best judgement.
- Best far corrected visual acuity ≤ 1/10.
- Ongoing or known history of ocular allergy and/or uveitis and/or viral infection.
- Severe dry eye (defined by severe epithelial erosions of the cornea and/or use of dry eye medication with a frequency exceeding 8 instillations / day).
- Corneal ulceration.
- Palpebral abnormalities not related to medical treatment study and incompatible with a good evaluation.
- Any abnormality preventing accurate assessment e.g. reliable tonometry measurement, visual field examination.
- Non-controlled diabetic patient.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Laboratoires Théa
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of medical operation
- Organization
- Laboratoires Thea
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christophe Baudouin, Professor
Hopital des XV-XX
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2013
First Posted
December 20, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 2, 2020
Results First Posted
April 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02