Changes in Respiratory Effort in Preterm Infants
Respiratory Effort in Preterm Infants in the Transition From Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to High Flow Nasal Cannulae (HFNC)
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is used to treat preterm infants with an immature respiratory center and having respiratory distress. CPAP requires intensive care monitoring and special qualified staff. Continuous positive pressure makes a constant noise around the child and can lead to an uncomfortable environment.The fixture of the binasal prongs can cause nasal trauma after to tight attachment.Minimizing the time on CPAP is considered important for the child. Recently High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) has become widely used in modern newborn intensive care units.HFNC is considered to be easy to apply and a more comfortable respiratory support for the preterm infant with mild and moderate respiratory distress. HFNC gives warm humified air with high flow through a nasal cannulae. HFNC is used as part of withdrawal from intensive respiratory support, to prevent respiratory distress and as a respiratory support after extubation. There is still uncertainty about safety and effectiveness of HFNC. The aim of this study is to investigate the preterm infants respiratory effort by measuring electrical activity in diaphragm (Edi max and Edi min), respiratory parameters and a clinical observation using a scoring system inspired by Silverman- Andersen retraction score. It is expected that measured electrical activity in the diaphragm, measured respiratory parameters combined with bedside observations provide applicable knowledge about preterm infants respiratory effort in transition from CPAP to HFNC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedMarch 8, 2018
March 1, 2018
1.4 years
December 4, 2013
March 6, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Neural control of respiration
reflected by electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi): inspiratory drive (Edi peak) and tonic activity (Edi min). A nasogastric feeding tube with ten microsensors will measure action potentials from the phrenic nerve to the diaphragm.
4 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Respiratory signs
4 months
Study Arms (2)
HFNC first
ACTIVE COMPARATOR4 hours with High Flow Nasal Cannulae (HFNC) 6 l/pr.min, then 4 hours with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 6l/pr.min.
CPAP first
ACTIVE COMPARATOR4 hours Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 6 l/pr.min, then 4 hours High Flow Nasal Cannulae (HFNC) 6 l/pr.min.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Preterm infants who are stable on Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) with flow 8l/min
- \<34 and \>28 gestational weeks, respiratory stable last 72 hours.
- kilo
- Fi02\< 30%
- C02\<9
- written informed consent by parents/caregivers
You may not qualify if:
- need for sedation
- damage on the phrenic nerve
- anomalies in the upper airways
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. Olavs Hospitallead
- Norwegian University of Science and Technologycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Newborn Intensive Care Unit, St Olavs Hospital
Trondheim, Norway
Related Publications (1)
Brenne H, Grunewaldt KH, Follestad T, Bergseng H. A randomised cross-over study showed no difference in diaphragm activity during weaning from respiratory support. Acta Paediatr. 2018 Oct;107(10):1726-1732. doi: 10.1111/apa.14303. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
PMID: 29504671RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Håkon Bergseng, MD PhD
St. Olavs Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2013
First Posted
December 18, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 8, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03