NCT02012439

Brief Summary

Chronic pain is a pervasive, serious problem for many individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) that is typically inadequately treated by medications alone. There is a critical need to develop and evaluate innovative psychosocial interventions that have the capacity to effectively target the multidimensional nature of MS pain. Cognitive Therapy (CT) is one psychosocial treatment that has been found to be a potentially beneficial treatment for chronic MS pain. This approach teaches patients to identify and replace unhelpful thoughts about pain with helpful, more adaptive thoughts. In addition, over the past decade there has been a steady upsurge of research examining mindfulness meditation-based therapies for the treatment of medical conditions, including symptoms associated with MS. Mindfulness mediation involves training the mind to disengage from automatic thinking patterns to mindfully perceive, in a non-judgmental manner, one's moment-to-moment experiences. This meditation technique teaches patients to become aware of thoughts, emotions, and physical sensations and to recognize that these are transient experiences that can be mindfully perceived, accepted and let go. A promising, more recent trend in treatment development research is the integration of tradition CT with mindfulness-based meditation, an approach referred to as Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT). To date, we are the only research group that has adapted and tested a manualized MBCT approach for the treatment of painful medical conditions. Thus, the proposed pilot randomized controlled trial aims to utilize state-of-the-art research methodology to evaluate traditional Cognitive Therapy (CT) compared to an innovative, newly developed Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) protocol for the treatment of chronic pain in individuals with multiple sclerosis. This study will answer three primary questions: (1) Do these treatments work to improve chronic pain for individuals with MS and do these treatment also improve associated symptoms such as depression, fatigue, and engagement in daily activities?; (2) How do these treatments work in individuals with MS, i.e., what factors underlie improvement in outcomes during treatment?; and (3) What are the individual person characteristics that best predict outcome? This will be the first study to examine MBCT within an MS population. The results will lead to the emergence of a novel, much needed additional psychosocial treatment option for patients with chronic MS pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1 multiple-sclerosis

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2013

Typical duration for phase_1 multiple-sclerosis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2013

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 22, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2013

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2015

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

September 16, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

October 22, 2013

Last Update Submit

September 11, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

multiple sclerosischronic paintreatmentnonpharmacologicalmindfulnesscognitive therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • pain intensity

    numeric rating scale (0-10 scale)

    at post-treatment (5 weeks on average)

Study Arms (2)

Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy

Behavioral: Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy

Cognitive therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cognitive Therapy

Behavioral: Cognitive Therapy

Interventions

Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy
Cognitive therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of MS obtained by ICD coding list
  • At least 6 months post-diagnosis.
  • At least 18 years old.
  • Read, speak and understand English.
  • Experience chronic pain on a daily basis.
  • Most significant pain problem(s) is or are related to MS.
  • Report an average pain intensity of at least 4 on a 0-10 Numerical Scale in the past week.
  • Most significant pain problem(s) has or have lasted at least six months.
  • Experience ongoing pain with an average intensity of 4 or more on a 0-10 scale when they experience pain.\*
  • Have internet access on a daily basis.

You may not qualify if:

  • \. Psychiatric condition or symptoms that would interfere with participation, specifically active suicidal ideation with intent to harm oneself or active delusional or psychotic thinking

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UW Medicine Multiple Sclerosis Center

Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple SclerosisChronic Pain

Interventions

Mindfulness-Based Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioral Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MindfulnessBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Dawn Ehde, PhD

    University of Washington

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Rehabilitation Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2013

First Posted

December 16, 2013

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

September 16, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Locations