V.A.C. VeraFlo™ Instillation Therapy vs V.A.C. Ulta™ Therapy on Biofilm in Chronically Infected Wounds
A Prospective, Open, Comparative, Randomized Single-center Study to Evaluate the Effect of V.A.C. VeraFlo™ Therapy With .125% Dakins vs V.A.C. Ulta™ Therapy on Biofilm Removal/Disruption/Elimination in Chronically Infected Wounds
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study would like to determine if using negative pressure wound therapy with an instillation of .125% Dakins is more effective than using negative pressure wound therapy alone on biofilm removal, disruption and elimination in chronically infected lower extremity wounds.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 27, 2018
CompletedNovember 27, 2018
November 1, 2018
1.5 years
November 24, 2013
February 22, 2018
November 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Bacteria Colony-forming Units Using When NPWT and NPWTi on Venous Leg Ulcers
Biopsies for bacteria colony-forming units obtained at pre surgical debridement (baseline) and day 7.
Baseline and day 7
Study Arms (2)
VAC VeraFlo with Dakins Instillation
ACTIVE COMPARATORVAC VeraFlo with Dakins .125% instillation will be initially applied in the OR after surgical debridement. Dressing will be changed on day 4 and and removed on day 7. Wound assessments will continue at weeks 2, 3, and 4.
VAC Ulta Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORVAC ULTA Therapy will be initially applied in the OR after surgical debridement. Dressing will be changed on day 4 and and removed on day 7. Wound assessments will continue at weeks 2, 3, and 4.
Interventions
VAC VeraFlo with Dakins instillation will be placed in the operating room after surgical debridement. Biopsies will be obtained prior to surgical debridement, after surgical debridement, on day 4, and on day 7.
VAC ULTA will be placed in the operating room after surgical debridement. Biopsies will be obtained prior to surgical debridement, after surgical debridement, on day 4, and on day 7.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient is of 18 years or older.
- Males and females - provided they are not pregnant and if of reproductive age are using contraception.
- Patient with ulcers that:
- Have an ulcer area of at least 4 cm2 confirmed via counting squares on an wound tracing
- Have been present for at least 4 weeks
- Are confirmed to have a colony forming unit per gram of wound tissue greater than or equal to 10 to the 5th cfu
- Are full thicknesses through to dermal or subcutaneous tissue but not extending to muscle or bone.
- The patient has an ABI of greater or equal to 0.8 and lower than 1.3 or has a suitable Peripheral Vascular Resistance (PVR) and Doppler assessment which confirms venous disease \& therefore treatment with Profore is deemed acceptable by the clinician.
- The patient has one or more clinical signs of infection (edema, malodor, local/periwound erythema, spontaneous pain between dressing changes, increased exudate, discoloration of granulation tissue, increased temperature at wound, non progression of wound, purulent exudate and friable granulation tissue)
- The patient is able to understand the evaluation and is willing to consent to the evaluation.
- Patients with a suitable wound on a different limb to any other wounds previously eligible.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing chemotherapy
- Patients being treated with immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroids
- Patients with an autoimmune disease
- Patients who have participated in an experimental drug or device study within the last 15 days
- Patients that have been entered in this evaluation previously as an evaluable patient.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Centerlead
- Kinetic Concepts, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
New York, New York, 10025, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limitation: small sample size and associated large data variance. Absence of a standardized biopsy schema given the heterogeneous distribution of biofilm-protected bacteria within wounds, may not properly capture effects of the treatment modalities.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. John C. Lantis II
- Organization
- Mount Sinai St. Luke's
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John C Lantis, MD
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2013
First Posted
December 12, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 27, 2018
Results First Posted
November 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11