Study Stopped
No patients accrued.
Comparison of Stationary Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-D Digital Mammography in Patients With Breast Augmentation
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose:The aim of this research is to compare the 3D s-DBT (stationary digital breast tomosynthesis) and conventional 2-D digital mammography devices with regards to patient comfort and radiologist preference in women with breast implants. Participants: Women with breast implants undergoing routine 2-D digital mammography. Procedures (methods): 50 female subjects with breast implants undergoing conventional screening mammography will be recruited to have a single view s-DBT in the mediolateral projection. We will perform a patient preference study and radiologist reader study composed of radiologists who have experience evaluating tomosynthesis images. A short survey will be given to each patient about their preference in modality with respect to comfort. Each reader will review the images and score the ease of interpretation, and their confidence of interpretation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 3, 2017
CompletedJune 28, 2018
June 1, 2018
3.8 years
December 6, 2013
June 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Receiver Operative Curve (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (percentage)
Receiver Operative Curve (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis of the stationary breast tomosynthesis (SDBT) system for the the characterization of suspicious breast lesions in comparison to x-ray mammography.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Reader preference - arbitrary units
18 months
Patient preference - arbitrary units
18 months
Study Arms (1)
All patients
EXPERIMENTALStationary Breast Tomosynthesis
Interventions
The patient will have the SDBT study performed in a similar manner as conventional mammography in the mediolateral oblique and cranio-caudal plane. The participant will stand up and the mammography research technologist, ensuring patient comfort, will assist in positioning their breast in the breast tomosynthesis unit with standard compression. Once positioned, the total scan time is approximately 10 seconds. Both the left and right breast will be imaged. The length of time for the positioning and examination of a subject's breast may vary but it is expected that the entire imaging procedure will take about 5-10 min, including positioning time.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women at least 18 years old.
- Able to provide informed consent.
- History of breast augmentation mammoplasty (at least 1 year prior)
You may not qualify if:
- Male. (It is uncommon for men to present for breast imaging)
- Less than 18 years of age.
- Patient unable to give consent. Institutionalized subject (prisoner or nursing home patient).
- Any woman who is pregnant or has reason to believe she is pregnant or any woman who is lactating
- Patient with a history of breast cancer (they would not be a screening exam)
- Patient with a known breast cancer (they would not be a screening study)
- Patient with a lump or nipple discharge (diagnostic population)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UNC Hospital
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yueh Lee, MD, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2013
First Posted
December 11, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 3, 2017
Study Completion
October 3, 2017
Last Updated
June 28, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06