Study Stopped
Batch recall for Misago Terumo self-expanding peripheral stent systems.(withdrawal from the market)
BATTLE Trial: Bare Metal Stent Versus Paclitaxel Eluting Stent in the Setting of Primary Stenting of Intermediate Length Femoropopliteal Lesions
BATTLE
1 other identifier
interventional
186
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Over the past years, endovascular interventions have become an important part of treatment in patients with peripheral arterial disease.1 Indication for endovascular repair of femoropopliteal lesions has been considerably enlarged as shown in the TASC classification.1 Enlargement of endovascular therapy indication was based on patient choice for a less invasive technique and evidence based medicine. Consequently, TASC classification of lesions has been modified to reflect increased evidence for endovascular treatment of more extensive femoropopliteal lesions, and indication for endovascular repair has been enlarged to more severe TASC types. In summary, endovascular treatment is indicated for TASC A and B lesions which correspond to femoropopliteal lesions ≤15-cm. To treat these lesions, the interventionalists have at their disposal a huge tool box. Evaluation of these tools is crucial to determine the right treatment strategy to avoid further reinterventions and overcosts. The objective of the BATTLE trial is to compare a bare metal self expandable nitinol stent (Misago RX) versus a paclitaxel eluting stent (Zilver PTX) in the treatment of above-the-knee intermediate length femoropopliteal lesions. From hospitals in Europe (France, Switzerland) we will randomly assign patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesions to be treated either by bare metal stent or paclitaxel eluting stent. In total, 186 patients will be randomized (93 per group).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 7, 2020
CompletedFebruary 8, 2021
February 1, 2021
3.4 years
December 3, 2013
February 3, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Freedom from in-stent restenosis at 1 year
It was defined by restenosis of \>50% and by a peak systolic velocity index \>2.4 at the target lesion.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (13)
residual diameter stenosis
Day 0
Primary sustained clinical improvement
1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary sustained clinical improvement
1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Primary patency
1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Major adverse events
1 month, 12 months and 24 months
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Misago RX (Misago RX, Terumo Corp., Tokyo
OTHERThe Misago RX is a peripheral stent (Misago RX, Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan) indicated to treat iliac and femoropopliteal arteries. The Misago RX is a flexible self-expanding nitinol stent that is delivered via a RX monorail delivery catheter.
Zilver PTX (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA)
OTHERZilver PTX (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) is a nitinol stent with a polymer-free paclitaxel coating designed to treat the above- the-knee femoropopliteal arteries. The anti-proliferative drug is the paclitaxel, a cytotoxic drug. The Zilver PTX stent is delivered via a over-the-wire system.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient ≥18 years
- Patient has a history of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (Rutherford classification: 2-5)
- Lesion is eligible for treatment with a maximum of 2 stents per lesion (treatment of both legs is not permitted)
- Patient is affiliated to the Social Security or equivalent system
- Patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions (and only for swiss centers, has signed the informed consent form prior to any study related procedure)
- Patient agrees to undergo all protocol required follow-up examinations and requirements at the investigational site
- Reference vessel diameter 4 to 7-mm determined by CT scan (RVD obtained from averaging 5-mm segments proximal and distal to the lesions)
- Target lesion has a pre-procedure percent diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% DS
- De novo atherosclerotic lesions (stenosis and/or occlusion) of the superficial femoral artery, the proximal popliteal artery (P1), or both. The treatment area in the SFA and popliteal artery extended from 1 cm below the origin of the profunda femoris artery to 3 cm above the proximal margin of the intercondylar fossa of the femur.
- Target lesion (single or multiple) has a maximal total length =14-cm and a minimal length = 2-cm
- At least 1 patent runoff vessel (\<50% DS throughout its course). The inflow artery(ies) cannot be treated using a drug eluting stent or drug coated balloon.
You may not qualify if:
- Asymptomatic lesion
- Restenosis
- No atheromatous disease
- Untreated \>50% DS of the inflow tract
- Resting ankle brachial index (ABI) unavailable
- Female of child bearing potential
- Patient has received, or is on the waiting list for a major organ transplant
- Patient has a history of coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions
- Patient is receiving or scheduled to receive anticancer therapy for malignancy within 1 year prior to or after the procedure
- Severe concomitant disease with life expectation \< one year
- Known allergy to paclitaxel
- Contraindication to Aspirin or Clopidogrel and Ticlopidin (the patient must be able to receive Dual Anti-Platelet Treatment for 2 months after the procedure)
- Patient has an infected wound or osteomyelitis on the ipsilateral extremity or foot.
- Patient has had prior major amputation to the ipsilateral (target) extremity
- Patient is not able to give informed consent (and only for swiss centers)
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
Clinique d'Antony
Antony, France
CHU de Besançon
Besançon, France
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
Centre Hospitalier Pierre Oudot Bourgoin Jallieu
Bourgoin, 38302, France
CHU de Clermont Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
AP-HP, Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, France
CHU de Lyon
Lyon, France
CHU Nantes
Nantes, 44000, France
Clinique Ollioules
Ollioules, France
CHU de Rennes
Rennes, France
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, France
Related Publications (1)
Goueffic Y, Kaladji A, Guyomarch B, Montagne C, Fairier D, Gestin S, Riche VP, Vent PA, Chaillou P, Costargent A, Patra P. Bare metal stent versus paclitaxel eluting stent for intermediate length femoropopliteal arterial lesions (BATTLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Oct 30;15:423. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-423.
PMID: 25359394DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Yann GOUEFFIC, Professor
Nantes University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2013
First Posted
December 9, 2013
Study Start
March 25, 2014
Primary Completion
August 31, 2017
Study Completion
August 7, 2020
Last Updated
February 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02