Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Botulinum Toxin Injection Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Only in Patients With Atrial Flutter
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized study was to assess the effectiveness of endomyocardial botulinum toxin injection for preventing post-procedural atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing the radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jun 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 23, 2015
September 1, 2015
2 years
December 2, 2013
September 21, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
number of paroxysms of atrial fibrillation
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
AF burden
1 year
serious adverse events
1 year
Study Arms (2)
RFA+BT injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransseptal puncture is performed by used standard endovascular approach. Injection of the botulinum toxin is performed in main anatomical zones of ganglionated plexuses of left atrium using Myostar catheter (Biosense Webster).
RFA
ACTIVE COMPARATORExternally-irrigated tip (5-mm tip, Celsius Thermo-Cool, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA). Temperature-controlled RF delivery was performed with a maximum power output of 50 W and temperature limit of 50 C. The catheter was irrigated using 0.9% saline infusion at a flow rate of 20-40 mL/min during RF delivery and 2 mL/min between applications using a commercially available pump (Cool Flow, Biosense Webster).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- ECG documented paroxysmal or persistent AFL
- No prior documented history of AF
- Patient undergoing RFA of AFL.
- No indication (other than AFL) for continued anticoagulation with warfarin.
- No existing implantable cardiac device (pacemaker, defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy device)
You may not qualify if:
- A history of atrial fibrillation
- Previous AF ablation procedure
- Congestive heart failure
- Left Ventricle ejection fraction less than 35%
- Unwillingness to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Novosibirsk, 630055, Russia
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2013
First Posted
December 6, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09