Follow-up of Abnormal and Inadequate Smear-test Results
1 other identifier
interventional
125,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Denmark has a higher incidence of cervical cancer than other Nordic countries, although all Danish women (aged 23-65) are screened regularly to identify possible cervical dysplasia or asymptomatic invasive cancer. Annually 40 000 women receives an abnormal or inadequate test result and a follow-up recommendation. However problems with delayed follow-up may threaten the effectiveness of the Danish Cervical Cancer Screening Program, as 20% of women are delayed and dysplasia potentially can progress into cancer. Delayed follow-up is found in situations where women either consciously or unconsciously postpone follow-up, or because of organizational aspects of the screening program, where communication regarding test results can fail either in content or with delay.This study will evaluate two interventions designed to increase follow-up:
- 1.A letter with the test result and potential recommendation for follow up will be sent to the women (RCT). The intention is to ensure that all women will be notified about the test result, quickly, homogenously and in layman's written language, still with the opportunity to contact or be contacted by the general practitioner, if there is special needs. Furthermore, it is assumed that general practitioner consultations regarding delivery of normal test results will decrease, so that cost savings is a potential side benefit
- 2.Electronic reminder to the general practitioner if women have not had the recommended follow up, giving the general practioner´s an opportunity to remind the women (retro perspective cohort study).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 15, 2016
December 1, 2015
2 years
November 29, 2013
September 14, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of women with timely follow-up
The proportion of women followed up will be calculated as cumulated incidence proportions according to four timeframes (undesirable early, as recommended, late, very late), and be compared by relative risks. The results will be presented in totals and separately depending on the test result (normal/inadequate/Bethesda classification 2001/HPV).
1½ year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Frequency of general practitioner contacts (consultations/telephone calls /e-mails) regarding conveying the smear test result.
Three months after the smear test.
Study Arms (2)
Test result sent by letter
EXPERIMENTALThe pap-smear test result is sent by letter directly to the women. Women in need of follow up are in the letter recommended to contact their general practitioner.
Test result conveyed by general practitioners
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Denmark it is a standard procedure that general practitioners convey the pap-smear test results to the women.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- woman with a pap-smear test
You may not qualify if:
- less than 23 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Aarhus
Aarhus, Central Jutland, 8000, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Kristiansen BK, Andersen B, Bro F, Svanholm H, Vedsted P. Direct notification of cervical cytology results to women improves follow-up in cervical cancer screening - A cluster-randomised trial. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Nov 23;13:118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.11.015. eCollection 2019 Mar.
PMID: 30568870DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Peter Vedsted
Center for Research in Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care - (CaP), Aarhus University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Flemming Bro
The Research Unit of General Practice in Aarhus, Aarhus University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Berit S Andersen
The Department of Public Health Programmes at Regional Hospital Randers
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2013
First Posted
December 5, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 15, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-12