NCT02002468

Brief Summary

Denmark has a higher incidence of cervical cancer than other Nordic countries, although all Danish women (aged 23-65) are screened regularly to identify possible cervical dysplasia or asymptomatic invasive cancer. Annually 40 000 women receives an abnormal or inadequate test result and a follow-up recommendation. However problems with delayed follow-up may threaten the effectiveness of the Danish Cervical Cancer Screening Program, as 20% of women are delayed and dysplasia potentially can progress into cancer. Delayed follow-up is found in situations where women either consciously or unconsciously postpone follow-up, or because of organizational aspects of the screening program, where communication regarding test results can fail either in content or with delay.This study will evaluate two interventions designed to increase follow-up:

  1. 1.A letter with the test result and potential recommendation for follow up will be sent to the women (RCT). The intention is to ensure that all women will be notified about the test result, quickly, homogenously and in layman's written language, still with the opportunity to contact or be contacted by the general practitioner, if there is special needs. Furthermore, it is assumed that general practitioner consultations regarding delivery of normal test results will decrease, so that cost savings is a potential side benefit
  2. 2.Electronic reminder to the general practitioner if women have not had the recommended follow up, giving the general practioner´s an opportunity to remind the women (retro perspective cohort study).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
125,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2012

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 29, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2013

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2014

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 15, 2016

Status Verified

December 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

November 29, 2013

Last Update Submit

September 14, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Risk CommunicationFollow-upOrganisation of screening

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of women with timely follow-up

    The proportion of women followed up will be calculated as cumulated incidence proportions according to four timeframes (undesirable early, as recommended, late, very late), and be compared by relative risks. The results will be presented in totals and separately depending on the test result (normal/inadequate/Bethesda classification 2001/HPV).

    1½ year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Frequency of general practitioner contacts (consultations/telephone calls /e-mails) regarding conveying the smear test result.

    Three months after the smear test.

Study Arms (2)

Test result sent by letter

EXPERIMENTAL

The pap-smear test result is sent by letter directly to the women. Women in need of follow up are in the letter recommended to contact their general practitioner.

Other: Test result sent by letterOther: Test result conveyed by general practitioners

Test result conveyed by general practitioners

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In Denmark it is a standard procedure that general practitioners convey the pap-smear test results to the women.

Other: Test result conveyed by general practitioners

Interventions

Test result sent by letter
Test result conveyed by general practitionersTest result sent by letter

Eligibility Criteria

Age23 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • woman with a pap-smear test

You may not qualify if:

  • less than 23 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Aarhus

Aarhus, Central Jutland, 8000, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Kristiansen BK, Andersen B, Bro F, Svanholm H, Vedsted P. Direct notification of cervical cytology results to women improves follow-up in cervical cancer screening - A cluster-randomised trial. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Nov 23;13:118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.11.015. eCollection 2019 Mar.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precancerous ConditionsNeoplasmsUterine Cervical DiseasesUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Peter Vedsted

    Center for Research in Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care - (CaP), Aarhus University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Flemming Bro

    The Research Unit of General Practice in Aarhus, Aarhus University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Berit S Andersen

    The Department of Public Health Programmes at Regional Hospital Randers

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2013

First Posted

December 5, 2013

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion

October 1, 2014

Study Completion

February 1, 2017

Last Updated

September 15, 2016

Record last verified: 2015-12

Locations