Comparison of a Single Use (Ambu aScope) and a Reusable Flexible Optical Scope for Intubation Through a Supraglottic Airway Device (Aura-i)
A Comparison Between Flexible Single Use Endoscopes (Ambu aScopes) and Reusable Flexible Endoscopes Used as a Standard of Car When Intubation the Trachea Via an Aura-I Supraglottic Airway Device
1 other identifier
interventional
100
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
In patient who are predicted to be difficult to intubate with a standard direct laryngoscope well use flexible optical intubation via a supraglottic airway devise (the Ambu Aura-i). Patients are randomly assigner to a single- or a multiple- use flexible optical scope. We hypothesize that intubation is obtained equally effective with both types of flexible scopes
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedMay 21, 2014
May 1, 2014
1.1 years
November 24, 2013
May 20, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of intubation. From the endoscope enters the supraglottic-airway-device to CO2-curve is seen
Measured during tracheal intubation at induction of anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Number of attempts at placing the supraglottic-airway-device (SAD)
From anesthesia induction and the following 10 minutes during securing of the airway
number of attempts at placing the flexible endoscope in the trachea
From anesthesia induction and the following 10 minutes
number of attempts at intubation
From anesthesia induction and during the following 10 minutes during airway management
Total time for placement of SAD and endoscopy and intubation
During induction of anesthesia and the following 10 minutes during airway management
The best glottic view obtained
After anesthesia induction and during the following 10 minutes during airway management
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Single use flexible optical scope
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle use flexible optical scope , Ambu aScope
Multiple use flexible optical scope
ACTIVE COMPARATORMultiple use flexible optical scope
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA physical status 1-3 and evaluated pre-operatively and found suitable for tracheal intubation with a flexible optical scope via the SAD and scheduled for elective surgery/anesthesia and are conscious about their rights and consequences of participating in the study.
- The patient must have one or two of the following predictors of difficult tracheal intubation:
- Modified Mallampati score \> 2 (= "no parts of the Uvula is visible")
- a thyromental distance of less then or equal to 6.5 cms
- Combined movement in head and neck \< 90 degrees
- Mouth-opening less the 4 cm (but must be larger then 2.5 cm)
- Inability to protrude the teeth n the lower jaw beyond the upper incisors
- BMI \> 40 combined with a neck-circumference \> 43 cms
- Upper-lip-bite-test \> 2
- Previous difficult intubation or laryngoscopy (If more then two criteria are fulfilled the patient should be considered intubated awake instead. . But the upper-lip-bite-test and the prognation-beyond the incisors test represents a similar thing, namely the inability to sub-luxate the lower jaw, the if both these findings are positive it is only considered as counting for one.
You may not qualify if:
- ASA physical status 4 or 5
- contraindications for use of the SAD
- Patients in whom intubation via a SAD has previously failed
- Patients at risk of aspiration from the gastrointestinal channel
- diseases in mouth, pharynx or larynx that precludes the use of a SAD
- Patients in whom the cricothyroid membrane cannot be localized preanaesthetically
- Patients in whom the doctor making the pre-anaesthetic evaluation finds in need of an awake intubation
- Patients with possible Creutzfeldt-Jacobs disease or contraindication against the use of non-autoclavable equipment r risk of cross contamination with prions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarklead
- Ambu A/Scollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Service d'anesthesie-reanimation 1 avenue Moliere Hopiatl de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, 67098, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael S Kristensen
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant anaesthetist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2013
First Posted
December 5, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 21, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05