Study Stopped
Stopped early by DSMB due to slow enrollment - obtained data to be analyzed
Routine Versus Selective Use of FFR to Guide PCI
FFR-SELECT
A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study of Routine Versus Selective Use of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) to Guide Non-Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
1 other identifier
interventional
261
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a test that can be performed at the time of heart catheterization. It measures the change in pressure across a narrowing in the heart artery during high flow situation, and provides reliable information about the functional severity of the narrowing. FFR measurements accurately predict whether a stent is needed, and is considered an excellent test before placement of stents to treat narrowed heart arteries. However, FFR is not used in every case because of the extra time needed and the associated device costs. Cardiac Services BC (an agency of Provincial Health Services Authority) is sponsoring this study to find out if FFR should be used in most cases (routine), rather than the current selective approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2014
Typical duration for phase_4
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 26, 2019
February 1, 2019
3.1 years
November 27, 2013
February 25, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite of all cause mortality, repeat hospitalization for MI or repeat revascularization (PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting - CABG)
1 Year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
All cause mortality
1 Year
Repeat hospitalization for MI
1 Year
Rate of repeat revascularization (PCI or CABG)
1 Year
Time of procedure, contrast amount, and radiation dose
Post-procedure
Other Outcomes (1)
Economic evaluation, including health resource utilization
1 Year
Study Arms (2)
Routine use of FFR
EXPERIMENTALFractional Flow Reserve (FFR) used in most cases to guide PCI
Selective use of FFR
ACTIVE COMPARATORFractional Flow Reserve (FFR) used at investigator discretion (Current practice)
Interventions
Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) performed per guidelines to guide PCI
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects with stable coronary artery disease or recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Subjects who present with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are allowed to be included after 5 days from initial presentation.
- At least one obstructive coronary lesion is present with vessel reference diameter ≥2.5 mm and diameter stenosis ≥50% by visual estimate. Lesions must be technically suitable for the FFR procedure and angioplasty with stent placement.
- Physician will classify all target lesions and need for FFR before randomization, and there is a plan to perform a non-emergent PCI.
- Subject is ≥18 years old, with signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Expected non-cardiac longevity \< 2 years.
- Planned treatment with CABG.
- Planned treatment with medical therapy.
- Left main disease \> 50% diameter stenosis based on visual estimate.
- Safety issues:
- Unstable hemodynamics or serious arrhythmias during procedure;
- Ongoing ischemic chest pain;
- High grade AV block (unless pacemaker);
- Allergic to adenosine.
- When FFR is clearly not needed:
- Target vessel with slow flow (\< TIMI-3);
- Single vessel disease with ≥90% stenosis;
- Single vessel disease with ≥80% stenosis and documented ischemia on functional imaging test;
- In acute coronary syndrome, ≥70 stenosis identified as culprit.
- When FFR is clearly needed for all target lesions: as declared by the operator.
- +9 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Kelowna General Hospital
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Royal Jubilee Hospital
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anthony Fung, MBBS, FRCPC
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2013
First Posted
December 4, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02