NMES Efficacy on Patients With NBPP
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) Efficacy on Patients With Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy (NBPP)
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy (NBPP), characterized by weakness and sensory loss in the affected arm, results from damage in the prenatal period to the nerves extending from the spine to the arm. Proper stretching and exercise of the joints and affected arm from the time of diagnosis can greatly assist in the development of healthy movement of the limb. Additionally, neuromuscular electrical stimulation has been shown to be an effective treatment in other neural disorders and therefore its effectiveness in NBPP is worth studying. In the case of NBPP patients, the loss in normal arm function can be observed very early. Young patients will often neglect using the affected arm or modify motions to avoid the use of the biceps muscle, specifically in hand to mouth actions such as gripping a bottle or placing toys or other objects in the mouth. A goal of this study is to test the effectiveness of NMES on improving the biceps muscle Medical Research Council (MRC) strength and active range of motion (AROM). The subjects of this study are newborns between the ages of 3-9 months who are already a part of the University of Michigan Brachial Plexus program. Parents of the children will be trained to perform the neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy at home using the EMPI Continuum unit for 30 minutes each day and monthly follow up appointments will be performed be the research occupational therapists throughout three month study period. Parents of the participants will complete a questionnaire before and during the study period to help analyze for confounders and gather data regarding parent compliance and NMES effectiveness. To detect the effectiveness of NMES, two cohort groups using standard units and sham units will be recruited and compare with data analysis. The investigators predict that the NMES will effectively improve the ability of the neonate to increase use of the affected arm, specifically in muscle strength biceps MRC score and AROM.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 14, 2018
CompletedDecember 14, 2018
December 1, 2018
4.3 years
October 29, 2013
November 16, 2018
December 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Upper Extremity Muscle Strength
One of the two-blinded occupational therapists will conduct the evaluation at enrollment and 3-month follow-up clinic visit. In this study, we will evaluate the biceps strength using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system. The British Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system for muscle strength is based on a scale from 0 (minimum score, not testable), 1, 2, 3, 4, to 5 (maximum score, normal strength); higher score means better outcome. British Medical Research Council (MRC) grade 2 or higher is functional in terms of muscle power. In current study, we will examine the change of biceps British Medical Research Council (MRC) grade from baseline to 3-month.
Baseline to 3-month.
Change From Baseline in Upper Extremity Range of Motion
One of the two-blinded occupational therapists will assess the active range of motion (AROM) of elbow flexion using goniometer at enrollment and 3-month follow-up clinic visit. The minimum degree is 0 and the maximum degree is 150; the higher degree means better outcome. We will then examine the change of elbow flexion active range of motion (AROM) from baseline to 3-month.
Baseline to 3-month.
Other Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Spontaneous Hand-to-Mouth Movement
Baseline to 3-month.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Current Therapy
Baseline to 3-month.
Study Arms (2)
Standard NMES cohort
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who will apply standard NMES device.
Sham NMES cohort
SHAM COMPARATORPatients who will apply sham NMES device.
Interventions
Blinded parents will follow the NMES parent instructions and place the NMES on the biceps muscle of their child for 30 minutes every day for three months. * Rate(35 Hz) * Width (300 us) * Ch1 Ramp+ (2 seconds) * On Time 1 (10 seconds) * Ch1 Ramp - (2 seconds)
Blinded parents will follow the NMES parent instructions and place the NMES on the biceps muscle of their child for 30 minutes every day for three months. * Rate(35 Hz) * Width (48 us) * Ch1 Ramp+ (0 seconds) * On Time 1 (0 seconds) * Ch1 Ramp - (0 seconds)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children ages 3-9 months at time of enrollment
- NBPP patients who receive care from University Of Michigan Brachial Plexus Palsy clinic
- All gender/race/financial backgrounds
- active range of motion (AROM) elbow flexion \<150°
- All Narakas grades
- British Medical Research Council (MRC) grade 2- or 4 for biceps brachii
You may not qualify if:
- Brachial Plexus patients require needing surgical repair
- Patients with any existing secondary medical conditions
- Patients with elbow contracture greater than 5°
- British Medical Research Council (MRC) grade 5 for biceps brachii
- active range of motion (AROM) elbow flexion =150°
- Non-English speaking families
- Children already using NMES unit
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Michiganlead
- Spring Arbor Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Lynda Yang
- Organization
- University of Michigan
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lynda Yang, MD, PhD
Neurosurgery Department, University of Michigan Health System
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2013
First Posted
December 3, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 31, 2018
Study Completion
January 31, 2018
Last Updated
December 14, 2018
Results First Posted
December 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12