Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Unilateral or Bilateral Posterior Fixation in MI-TLIF
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the healing of the patients spine at 24-months following surgery and screw placement among 3 groups. The doctor will also compare clinical outcomes and the immediate and delayed medical and surgical complications among the 3 study groups. The goal of this study is to determine if treating patients with one of the 3 groups is better than the others.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 9, 2021
CompletedNovember 9, 2021
October 1, 2021
6.3 years
November 1, 2013
April 26, 2021
October 12, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare Bony Fusion Rates Radiographically Using CT Scans
Primary Outcome: To compare bony fusion rates at two years among the three study arms, using the Brantigan, Steffee and Fraser scale. Post-operative CT scans will be evaluated at 24 months for evidence of new solid osseous trabeculations bridging across the interspace.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Bony Fusion Rates Compared Clinically Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Survey
3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Bony Fusion Rates Compared Clinically Using the Oswestry Disability Index v2 (ODI v2) Survey
3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Bony Fusion Rates Compared Clinically Using the Short Form 36 Health Survey v2 (SF-36 v2)
3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Safety Outcome: Immediate and Delayed Medical and Surgical Complications Compared Among the Three Arms
post-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Exploratory Outcome: Compare Bony Fusion Rates Using X-ray Based Classification Scale
12 months and 24 months
Study Arms (3)
Group 1
OTHERUnilateral pedicle screws
Group 2
OTHERIpsilateral pedicle screws, contralateral facet screw
Group 3
OTHERBilateral pedicle screws
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-80 years.
- Symptomatic single-level lumbar disease including lumbosacral junction.
- Unilateral leg-dominant pain non-responsive to conservative management with concordant imaging findings. These include degenerative spondylolisthesis (grade 1 or 2), facet arthropathy +/- lateral disc herniation, recurrent disc herniation, or large central disc herniation.
- Back pain of confirmed discogenic origin (single level disease only).
- Failed conservative management for a minimum of 3 months.
- Negative serum pregnancy test (for women of childbearing potential)
You may not qualify if:
- Severe bilateral leg symptoms.
- Prior instrumented arthrodesis at any lumbar level.
- History of osteoporosis.
- Co-morbidities requiring medication that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing (i.e., oral or parenteral glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive agent, methotrexate).
- Severe co-morbidities (e.g., heart, respiratory, or renal disease).
- Recent (\<3 yrs) Co-incident spinal tumor or infection.
- Greater than single level symptomatic involvement.
- Associated thoracolumbar kyphotic or scoliotic deformity (\>10).
- Morbid obesity (BMI \> 40).
- History of metal sensitivity/foreign body sensitivity.
- Concurrent involvement in another investigational drug or device study that could confound study data.
- History of substance abuse (recreational drugs, prescription drugs, or alcohol) that could interfere with protocol assessments and/or with the subject's ability to complete the protocol required follow-up.
- Subjects who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant in the next 24 months.
- Prisoner.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ohio State Unviersity
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study is being ended early due to low enrollment. No analysis is planned due to the small cohort.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Shelby Miracle
- Organization
- OhioU
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
H. Francis Farhadi, MD, PhD
Ohio State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2013
First Posted
November 27, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 9, 2021
Results First Posted
November 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10