Direct Comparison of 2D Cardiac PET With 3D Cardiac PET
1 other identifier
observational
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Lowering the per-infusion dose of Rb-82 offers advantages of lessening radiation exposure and extending useable generator life. Prior studies have not shown equivalence of 3D vs 2D Rb-82 PET. The investigators therefore compare 3D PET after a lower Rb-82 dose (\~20 mCi) processed using a Monte-Carlo driven scatter correction algorithm against conventional higher dosage (\~50 mCi) 2D Rb-82 PET MPI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2004
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2013
CompletedNovember 25, 2013
November 1, 2013
8.3 years
August 1, 2012
November 20, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Quantitative Accuracy
To establish the quantitative accuracy of reconstructed volumes using Imagen3DTM when compared to other methods.
1 day
Visual Assessment
To establish that visual assessments of image quality and reader confidence using 3D data are equivalent to the other methods.
1 day
Study Arms (1)
Single Cohort
Population: 19 subjects, mean age 65 years, mean BMI 30 kg/m2, 79% male. Radionuclide Dosage: Rb-82 doses were rest 53+/-5 mCi and stress 53+/-6 mCi All were stress with Dipyridamole.
Eligibility Criteria
19 subjects, mean age 65 years, mean BMI 30 kg/m2, 79% male.
You may qualify if:
- \>18 Years of Age
- Have ability to provide informed consent
- Have a technically adequate rest/stress Rb-82 perfsion PET study within the past 60 days
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or nursing feamle
- Weight \> 275 lbs
- Have contraindications to adenosine stress testing
- Unstable cardiac rhythm (atrial fibrillation, frequent PVCs
- PTCA or CABG within the last 60 days
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Saint Lukes Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2012
First Posted
November 25, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2004
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 25, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11