What Are we Missing? Diagnosing Uterine Adenomyosis Using Ultrasound Elastography
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To improve the clinical care of women with pelvic pain and abnormal uterine bleeding due to benign uterine conditions including leiomyomas (uterine fibroids) and adenomyosis by evaluating the accuracy of radiology diagnostic exams (MRI(magnetic resonance imaging), ultrasound and ultrasound with elastography).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for early_phase_1
Started Nov 2013
Longer than P75 for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedMay 31, 2018
May 1, 2018
4.3 years
November 7, 2013
May 30, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI and ultrasound elastography for distinguishing adenomyosis and fibroids
Arm 1 patients will undergo hysterectomy (per previously defined clinical decision unrelated to the study) 4-6 weeks after enrollment and imaging tests, allowing us to correlate imaging and pathologic findings
1-2 months per patient
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient preference between ultrasound and MRI
6 months per patient
Study Arms (2)
Evaluation of MRI, US for pelvic conditions
ACTIVE COMPARATORMRI and ultrasound imaging will be used clinically to evaluate pelvic pain and abnormal uterine bleeding. The goal is to determine which exams are most helpful to the clinician in providing an accurate diagnosis as well as evaluating patient preference.
Patient preference MRI vs. US
ACTIVE COMPARATORWe are asking subjects to evaluate patient preference between MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and ultrasound to determine which they would rather undergo.
Interventions
Pelvic ultrasound with transabdominal and transvaginal imaging. The transvaginal ultrasound will include elastography (TVUS-E). Also, a pelvic MRI will be performed if not done in the last 6 months. The MRI is performed with IV gadolinium-based contrast (MultiHance ®). A patient survey will be included.
Subjects may take part in this arm because they have recently had a MRI performed and scheduled for, or have recently undergone a pelvic ultrasound. Subjects will also be asked to complete a survey that will state their preference with regards to examination/imaging. This will be done over the phone and will take no longer than 30 minutes to complete.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Pelvic pain and/or abnormal uterine bleeding. (this is specific for Arm. 1 of this study)
- If you have had or are scheduled to have both a pelvic MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and a pelvic ultrasound with 6 months of the time of enrollment. (this is specific to Arm 2 of this study).
You may not qualify if:
- If you are post-menopausal(have not had a period in at least one year's time).
- If you have been diagnosed with gynecological malignancy such as uterine, endometrial, cervical or ovarian cancer.
- If you are unable or unwilling to sign the informed consents
- If you are unable to undergo the research study exams -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Michiganlead
- Association of University Radiologistscollaborator
- GE Radiology Research Academic Fellowshipcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katherine Maturen, MD, MS
University of Michigan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2013
First Posted
November 25, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share