Study to Evaluate the Relative Abuse Potential of Almorexant in Recreational Drug Users
A Single Center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo- and Active-controlled, Six-way Crossover Single-dose Study to Evaluate the Relative Abuse Potential of Almorexant in Recreational Central Nervous System (CNS) Depressant Drug Users
1 other identifier
interventional
42
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This was a six-way crossover study with six single-dose treatment sessions. The profile of acute effects on abuse potential measures of different almorexant doses was compared to that of placebo and two doses of zolpidem
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Sep 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2013
CompletedFebruary 12, 2016
February 1, 2016
5 months
November 13, 2013
February 11, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maximum effect (Emax) over 24 h post-dose for "At the moment" Drug Liking Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score during each Treatment Visit
Emax was determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented a 'Strong disliking' and a score of '100' represented a 'Strong liking'.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Minimum Effect (Emin) and Time-weighted mean effect (TWMean) over 24 h post-dose for "At the moment" Drug Liking VAS score during each Treatment Visit
24 hours
Overall Drug Liking VAS score (Emax, Emin, and arithmetic mean effect of 8 h and 24 h post-dose assessments during each Treatment Visit)
24 hours
Good/Bad Drug Effects VAS score (Emax, Emin, and TWMean over 24 h post-dose during each Treatment Visit)
24 hours
Take Drug Again VAS score (Emax and arithmetic mean of 8 h and 24 h post-dose assessments during each Treatment Visit)
24 hours
Subjective Drug Value (SDV) (Emax and arithmetic mean of 8 h and 24 h post-dose assessment during each Treatment Visit)
24 hours
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Arm 1
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence ABFCED, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days.
Arm 2
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence BCADFE, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days.
Arm 3
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence CDBEAF, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days.
Arm 4
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence DECFBA, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days.
Arm 5
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence EFDACB, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days.
Arm 6
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence FAEBDC, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy male or female subjects 18 to 55 years of age, inclusive.
- Recreational drug use with a history of CNS depressant use, defined as at least 10 lifetime occasions of non-medical use of drugs with depressant/sedative properties (e.g., benzodiazepines, barbiturates, gammahydroxybutyric acid (GHB), zopiclone, zolpidem, cannabis, etc.), and at least one instance of non-medical use in the past year.
- Body mass index (BMI) within the range of 18 to 32 kg/m\^2, inclusive, and a minimum weight of 50 kg.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must have been practicing strict sexual abstinence or using a medically acceptable and reliable form of birth control with a failure rate of \< 1% per year from at least 1 month prior to Screening (at least 3 months for oral contraceptives) and for at least 1 month after the last study drug administration. Accepted methods of contraception included implants, injectables, combined oral hormonal contraceptives, some intrauterine devices, sexual abstinence, tubal ligation, or vasectomized partner.
- Female subjects of non-childbearing potential must have been amenorrheic for at least 1 year following natural menopause or had a hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy (as determined by subject medical history).
- Female subjects must have had a negative pregnancy test at Screening and at each admission.
- Must have passed Qualification Visit eligibility criteria.
- Must have been able to speak, read, and understand English sufficiently to understand the nature of the study, to provide written informed consent, and to allow completion of all study assessments.
- Willing and able to abide by all study requirements and restrictions.
- Give voluntary written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Received an investigational drug in a clinical trial within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
- Drug or alcohol dependence (except nicotine or caffeine) in the past 2 years as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), including subjects who had ever been in a drug rehabilitation program (other than treatment for smoking cessation).
- Unwillingness or inability to abstain from recreational drug use as required for the study.
- Positive breath alcohol test at Screening or at any admission.
- Clinically significant abnormalities on physical examination, medical history, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), vital signs, or laboratory tests, including a history or presence of psychiatric, cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, hematologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic, neurologic, or oncologic disease or any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigator would have jeopardized the safety of the subject or the validity of the study results.
- Previous history of fainting, collapses, syncope, orthostatic hypotension, or vasovagal reactions.
- Use of non-prescription medication, prescription medication, or natural health products (except vitamin or mineral supplements, acceptable forms of birth control, and hormone replacement) within 7 days prior to first drug administration in the Qualification Visit and throughout the study. Up to 1 g per day of acetaminophen was allowed at the discretion of the investigator. Concomitant medication known to inhibit or induce the cytochrome P3A4 isoenzyme was not allowed. Treatment with drugs metabolized by the cytochrome P2D6 isoenzyme was not allowed.
- History of allergy or hypersensitivity to study drugs, related drugs (e.g., benzodiazepines or gamma-aminobutyric acid related drugs) or excipients (including lactose).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edward M Sellers, MD, PhD
Kendle Early Stage - Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2013
First Posted
November 19, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
February 1, 2010
Study Completion
February 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 12, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02