Periodontal Dressing After Surgical Crown Lengthening
1 other identifier
interventional
37
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: There is controversy regarding the postoperative effects of periodontal dressing on the periodontium, pain and discomfort. The aim of the present study was to compare postoperative pain following surgical crown lengthening with and without the use of periodontal dressing. Material and Methods: A blind, randomized, clinical trial was carried out with 36 patients. Following surgical crown lengthening, the individuals were randomly allocated to the periodontal dressing group (PDG) and control group (CG - non-placement of periodontal dressing). Pain and discomfort were analyzed using a visual analog scale (VAS), verbal scale (VS) and the number of analgesics consumed in seven days postoperatively. Postoperative infection, stability of the gingival margin and type of healing were also evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 pain
Started Sep 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2013
CompletedNovember 19, 2013
November 1, 2013
1.1 years
October 27, 2013
November 12, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Position of the gingival margin
Following removal of the dressing, the examiner determined the position of the gingival margin. This position was determined individually using the same procedure performed in the immediate postoperative period based on the previously recorded fixed reference points. The determination of gingival recession, position of the gingival margin and gingival swelling was performed categorically, using the gingival margin in the immediate postoperative period for comparison.
Seven days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Local infection
seven Days
Healing
Seven Days
Pain and discomfort
Seven days
Gingival bleeding
Seven days
Study Arms (2)
Surgery with Periodontal dressing
EXPERIMENTALAfter the Surgical crown lengthening, the patients were randomly allocated to the periodontal dressing group (PDG) and control group (CG - non-placement of periodontal dressing).
Surgery without Periodontal dressing
OTHERAfter surgery, the patients were randomly allocated to the periodontal dressing group (PDG) and control group (CG - non-placement of periodontal dressing).
Interventions
After surgery,the dressing was mixed with a sterile spatula on a sterile glass plate following the manufacturer's instructions (2 cm of each paste measured with a sterile endodontic ruler). Coe-PakTM Regular was the dressing employed. Mixing and placement were performed only by the specialists in periodontics to ensure standardization. The dressing was inserted into the surgical wounds and molded to the necessary shape after setting sufficiently. The removal of the periodontal dressing was done after seven days.
The dressing was not inserted.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- need for surgical crown lengthening on only one tooth with need for proximal osteotomy;
- aged 18 years or older;
- absence of systemic disease;
- absence of periodontal disease at the site of surgical crown lengthening;
- no restrictions regarding the procedure;
- no need for antimicrobial prophylaxis.
You may not qualify if:
- failure to return for the postoperative evaluations;
- failure to fill out the charts correctly;
- occurrence of pulp alteration in the operated tooth following the procedure;
- occurrence of partial or total loss of the periodontal dressing;
- allergic reaction to periodontal dressing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Dentistry, Franciscan University Center
Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97010-491, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MS, Professor, School of Dentistry, Franciscan University Center (UNIFRA), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil;
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2013
First Posted
November 19, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 19, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11