CyberKnife® as Monotherapy or Boost SBRT for Intermediate or High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
Prospective Evaluation of CyberKnife® as Monotherapy or Boost Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Intermediate or High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
83
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to document the effectiveness of Cyberknife stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of intermediate and high-risk localized prostate cancer defined by biochemical Disease-Free Survival (bDFS), using Phoenix and American Society of Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology (ASTRO) definitions, at 5 years. During the prostate-specific antigen era, an ever-increasing percentage of men with prostate cancer have presented with clinically localized, potentially curable disease. Although conventional treatment options are potentially curative in selected patients, these treatments also have drawbacks, including the risk of negative long-term quality of life consequences and serious complications. The CyberKnife® system is a type of radiation machine that uses a special system to precisely focus large doses of x-rays on the tumor. The device is designed to concentrate large doses of radiation onto the tumor so that injury from radiation to the nearby normal tissue will be minimal. Intermediate risk patients will be treated with either CyberKnife® Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) monotherapy or CyberKnife® SBRT boost followed by Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). High risk patients will be treated with CyberKnife® SBRT boost followed by IMRT. Treatment will last 4-7 days. Patients will complete the QOL questionnaires before treatment. Questionnaires will also be completed during follow-up visits at 1, 3 , 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months then every 12 months until year 5.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2024
CompletedOctober 3, 2024
June 1, 2024
4.8 years
April 12, 2013
June 21, 2024
October 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Biochemical Disease-Free Survival (bDFS), Using Phoenix and ASTRO Definitions
Phoenix definition: Biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after curative radiotherapy defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise of ≥2 ng/ml above the nadir. Astro definition: Biochemical failure in prostate cancer defined as three consecutive rises in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after a nadir.
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Measure the Rates of Acute and Late Grade 3-5 Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicity
3 years
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Epic-26
3 years
Study Arms (2)
Intermediate Risk
EXPERIMENTALShort term (4-6 months) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) per current standard of care + CyberKnife 21 Gy (7 Gy x 3) and Prostate/SV Intensity Modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) 45-50.4 Gy OR Short term (4-6 months)androgen deprivation therapy + CyberKnife 36.35 Gray (7.27 Gray x 5)
High Risk
EXPERIMENTALShort or Long term (6 months - 3 years) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + 45-50.4 Gy and Pelvis Intensity Modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) per current standard of care + 21 Gy (7 Gy x 3) CyberKnife boost
Interventions
Per current standard of care
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital
Park Ridge, Illinois, 60068, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Geraldine Lara
- Organization
- Advocate Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arica Hirsch, MD
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Majid M Mohiuddin, MD
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2013
First Posted
November 15, 2013
Study Start
November 19, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2019
Last Updated
October 3, 2024
Results First Posted
October 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06