NCT01979198

Brief Summary

The surgical results of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fracture have been reported to be comparable between patients with and without fusion in a midterm follow-up. There is, however, no report comparing the results of fusion and non-fusion with a long-term follow-up. Therefore, a long term comparative study is still needed to focus on the issues of functional and radiographic outcomes, especially preservation of the motion segment in the long run, to determine whether fusion should be a routine procedure for surgically treated burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spines. Therefore, we report herein a long-term comparative study of fusion and non-fusion based on our previous work, with an average 134 months of follow-up.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2012

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 16, 2013

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 8, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2013

Status Verified

October 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

October 16, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 31, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

burst fracture, kyphotic angle, surgical outcome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Radiologic outcomes

    * Injured vertebral body height * Kyphotic angle * Regional segmental motion

    postoperative 6 weeks

  • Radiologic outcomes

    * Injured vertebral body height * Kyphotic angle * Regional segmental motion

    postoperative 12 weeks

  • Radiologic outcomes

    * Injured vertebral body height * Kyphotic angle * Regional segmental motion

    postoperative 6 months

  • Radiologic outcomes

    * Injured vertebral body height * Kyphotic angle * Regional segmental motion

    postoperative 12 months

  • Radiologic outcomes

    * Injured vertebral body height * Kyphotic angle * Regional segmental motion

    postoperative 24 months

  • Radiologic outcomes

    * Injured vertebral body height * Kyphotic angle * Regional segmental motion

    up to postoperative 161 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Functional outcomes

    postoperative 24 months

  • Functional outcomes

    up to postoperative 161 months

Study Arms (2)

fusion group

close reduction with posterior short-segment transpedicular screw fixation with posterior fusion

non-fusion group

close reduction with posterior short-segment transpedicular screw fixation without posterior fusion

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients suffered from burst fracture of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine

You may qualify if:

  • neurologically intact spine with a kyphotic angle more than 20o, decreased vertebral body height more than 50% or a canal compromise more than 50%;
  • incomplete neurological deficit with a canal compromise less than 50%;
  • complete neurological deficit;
  • multilevel spinal injury or multiple trauma.

You may not qualify if:

  • progression of the neurological deficit;
  • a canal compromise still more than 50% in those who showed no improvement of the neurological deficit.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dep. of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Taipei, 112, Taiwan

Location

Study Officials

  • Shih-Tien Wang, MD

    Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
10 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief, Division of Spine Surgery, Dep. of Orthopedics and Traumatology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2013

First Posted

November 8, 2013

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion

March 1, 2013

Study Completion

March 1, 2013

Last Updated

November 8, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-10

Locations