Impact of a Telephonic Monitoring During Inter-treatment Intervals on Emotional State, Quality of Life and Toxicities, on Neo Adjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy-treated Patients
EMOTION
2 other identifiers
interventional
274
1 country
2
Brief Summary
In health care, the phone has emerged as a clinical tool in its own right, especially for the development of psychological support to patients and that, in many pathologies. Its potential in the development of psycho-social support was quickly identified. However, to our knowledge, no prospective, randomized studies have evaluated the impact of a telephone call to both the anxiety and the management of side effects of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient incomplete care by the hospital system and the general practitioner during chemotherapy, as well as the lack of information and poor preparation and / or management of side effects, are a source of distress and lead to a decrease quality of life for the patient and his family. We propose to determine on a population of 280 patients, the impact of two phone calls during 3 first inter-treatment intervals on the overall measure of mood states of the patient and his principal caregiver (anxiety, depression, confusion, angry, fatigue, force and interpersonal relation). We will also study the gain in quality of life, on anxiety level, frequency and severity of toxicities, as well as emotional comfort of the procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedApril 23, 2026
April 1, 2026
5.1 years
October 22, 2013
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
emotional state (anxiety, depression, confusion, angry, fatigue, force and interpersonal relation)
comparison of the 2 types of monitoring in terms of overall measure of emotional state (anxiety, depression, confusion, angry, fatigue, force and interpersonal relation) of patients, with Profile of Mood States (POMS-f) questionnaire.
Change from baseline in POMS-f score at 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Evolution of emotional states scores
Change from baseline in POMS-f score at 6 weeks; Change from baseline in POMS-f score at 9 weeks and Change from baseline in POMS-f score at 12 weeks
toxicities
up to 15 weeks
quality of life
Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 score at 6 weeks and Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 score at 12 weeks
anxiety
up to 15 weeks
caregiver mood states
Change from baseline in POMS-f score at 6 weeks; Change from baseline in POMS-f score at 9 weeks and Change from baseline in POMS-f score at 12 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
intervention cost
up to 15 weeks
Study Arms (2)
A: Standard medical care
NO INTERVENTIONArm A: standard supervision and medical care during an adjuvant chemotherapy treatment in France
B: telephonic monitoring
EXPERIMENTALArm B: telephonic monitoring during inter-treatment intervals + personalized medical care.
Interventions
The standard medical supervision is defined as follows: * Prescription of prophylactics medication (corticoid, antiemetic, cream, mouthwash, etc) at each cycle of chemotherapy. * Nominative notebook containing details of chemotherapy administered and medical contacts. * Consultations with psycho-oncologist or psychiatrist (if necessary). The intervention further comprises: nurse phone calls the 3rd and the 8th day of the first three cycles of treatment, and personalized medical care according to toxicities reported.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient older than 18.
- Patient surgically-treated or no for non inflammatory breast cancer or for colon cancer or rectal cancer.
- Patient to be treated by neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC)-docetaxel, docetaxel-cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin(FOLFOX) or XELOX. A treatment with trastuzumab is allowed in association.
- Patient never treated by chemotherapy.
- Patient with Performance Status under or equal to 2.
- Patient with adequate hematopoietic, hepatic and cardiac functions according to the investigator.
- Patient having read with the information note and having signed the informed consent.
- Patient beneficiating from French health insurance cover.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with psychological state, geographical remote or social problems that contraindicated the participation into the study according to the investigator.
- Patient that must be treated for a metastatic disease.
- Patient not able to attend all study visits.
- Patient not understanding French.
- Patient who don't have a phone.
- Vulnerable patient: pregnant or breast-feeding women, person deprived of freedom by an administrative or judicial decision, person older than 18 being the object of a legal protection measure or outside state to express their consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, Cedex 2, 06189, France
Polyclinique St Jean
Cagnes-sur-Mer, 06800, France
Related Publications (6)
Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, Krupnick JL, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Bower JE, Belin TR. Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Mar 3;96(5):376-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh060.
PMID: 14996859BACKGROUNDStanton AL. Psychosocial concerns and interventions for cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 10;24(32):5132-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8775.
PMID: 17093275BACKGROUNDCarlson LE, Bultz BD. Cancer distress screening. Needs, models, and methods. J Psychosom Res. 2003 Nov;55(5):403-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(03)00514-2.
PMID: 14581094BACKGROUNDPitceathly C, Maguire P. The psychological impact of cancer on patients' partners and other key relatives: a review. Eur J Cancer. 2003 Jul;39(11):1517-24. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00309-5.
PMID: 12855257BACKGROUNDVitek L, Rosenzweig MQ, Stollings S. Distress in patients with cancer: definition, assessment, and suggested interventions. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Jun;11(3):413-8. doi: 10.1188/07.CJON.413-418.
PMID: 17623625BACKGROUNDContu S, Hebert C, Ferrero JM, Creisson A, Mari V, Kaluzinski L, Hoch B, Largillier R, Borchiellini D, Viellard T, Chateau Y, Chamorey E, Follana P. EMOTION: Assessing the Impact of a Telephone Intervention for Patients With Breast Cancer, a Randomized Controlled Trial. JCO Oncol Pract. 2026 Mar;22(3):474-483. doi: 10.1200/OP-24-00857. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
PMID: 40499090RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philippe FOLLANA, Dr.
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2013
First Posted
November 6, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04