NCT01970514

Brief Summary

To evaluate the clinical safety and effectiveness of the ARO Spinal System and to assess preliminary cost/benefit analysis in patients undergoing decompression surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations. The general hypothesis is that the ARO significantly improves outcomes in patients undergoing decompression surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Typical duration for early_phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2012

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 23, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 28, 2013

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

January 14, 2015

Status Verified

January 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

October 23, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 13, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Safety profile compared to historical controls and improvement in leg and back pain

    One year

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement is superior to historical control

    1 year

  • VAS back pain improvement is superior to historical control

    1 year

  • VAS leg pain improvement is superior to historical control,

    1 year

Other Outcomes (9)

  • The percentage of patients very or somewhat satisfied with their symptoms is greater than historical control

    1 year

  • There is an increase in the percentage of patients with evidence of annular healing in comparison to historical control

    1 year

  • There is a decrease in the percentage of patients with evidence of facet degenerative changes in comparison to historical control

    1 year

  • +6 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

ARO Spinal System

EXPERIMENTAL

ARO Spinal System

Device: ARO Spinal System

Interventions

The device provides an internal axial rotation orthosis (ARO) for patients being surgically treated for herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP).

ARO Spinal System

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Radicular pain and evidence of nerve-root irritation lasting 6 weeks or more as evidenced by both:
  • Radicular pain - below the knee,
  • Nerve root irritation
  • i. positive nerve root tension sign - straight leg raise positive between 30 and 70 degrees, or ii. positive femoral tension sign, or iii. neurologic deficit - asymmetrical depressed reflex or decreased sensation in a dermatomal distribution or weakness in a myotomal distribution.
  • Primary one-level posterolateral herniation in the lower lumbar spine (L4-L5 or L5-S1 only) as shown by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (protrusion, extrusion or sequestered fragment) consistent with the clinical symptoms (both level and side).
  • The investigator confirms that the patient is a surgical candidate for discectomy,
  • The patient has been scheduled for their surgical procedure no more than two months from time of consent,
  • years to 55 years of age at time of consent,
  • Willing to complete the study requirements and permit agency and sponsor authorized personnel to access medical records,
  • Able to understand oral and written Danish.

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous lumbar surgery
  • Cauda equine syndrome
  • Scoliosis greater than 15 degrees
  • Osteoporosis
  • Segmental instability (\> 10 degrees angular motion or \>4mm translation)
  • Vertebral fractures
  • Spinal Infections
  • Spinal tumors
  • Inflammatory spondyloarthropathy
  • Pregnancy or the intent to become pregnant in the following year
  • Comorbid conditions contraindicating surgery
  • Multiple herniations
  • Known allergy to titanium, aluminum or vanadium
  • Female patients of childbearing age, who are not willing to use adequate contraception specified as: intrauterine devices, hormonal contraceptives (contraceptive pills, implants, transdermal patches, hormonal vaginal devices or injections with prolonged release). It is accepted in certain cases to include subjects having a sterilized permanent partner or subjects using double barrier contraceptive methods which is a condom combined with a diaphragm.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, DK-8000, Denmark

Location

Study Officials

  • Cody Bunger, MD, DrMedSc

    Aarhus University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2013

First Posted

October 28, 2013

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion

July 1, 2015

Study Completion

July 1, 2015

Last Updated

January 14, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-01

Locations