Safety Study of ARO Spinal System as an Adjunct to Lumbar Decompression
Temporary Axial Rotation Stabilization for Lumbar Disc Prolapse Surgery With the ARO® Spinal System: A Non-randomized Prospective Analysis of Clinical Efficacy, Safety and Cost Effectiveness
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate the clinical safety and effectiveness of the ARO Spinal System and to assess preliminary cost/benefit analysis in patients undergoing decompression surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations. The general hypothesis is that the ARO significantly improves outcomes in patients undergoing decompression surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1
Started Apr 2012
Typical duration for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 14, 2015
January 1, 2015
3.2 years
October 23, 2013
January 13, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Safety profile compared to historical controls and improvement in leg and back pain
One year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement is superior to historical control
1 year
VAS back pain improvement is superior to historical control
1 year
VAS leg pain improvement is superior to historical control,
1 year
Other Outcomes (9)
The percentage of patients very or somewhat satisfied with their symptoms is greater than historical control
1 year
There is an increase in the percentage of patients with evidence of annular healing in comparison to historical control
1 year
There is a decrease in the percentage of patients with evidence of facet degenerative changes in comparison to historical control
1 year
- +6 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
ARO Spinal System
EXPERIMENTALARO Spinal System
Interventions
The device provides an internal axial rotation orthosis (ARO) for patients being surgically treated for herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Radicular pain and evidence of nerve-root irritation lasting 6 weeks or more as evidenced by both:
- Radicular pain - below the knee,
- Nerve root irritation
- i. positive nerve root tension sign - straight leg raise positive between 30 and 70 degrees, or ii. positive femoral tension sign, or iii. neurologic deficit - asymmetrical depressed reflex or decreased sensation in a dermatomal distribution or weakness in a myotomal distribution.
- Primary one-level posterolateral herniation in the lower lumbar spine (L4-L5 or L5-S1 only) as shown by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (protrusion, extrusion or sequestered fragment) consistent with the clinical symptoms (both level and side).
- The investigator confirms that the patient is a surgical candidate for discectomy,
- The patient has been scheduled for their surgical procedure no more than two months from time of consent,
- years to 55 years of age at time of consent,
- Willing to complete the study requirements and permit agency and sponsor authorized personnel to access medical records,
- Able to understand oral and written Danish.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous lumbar surgery
- Cauda equine syndrome
- Scoliosis greater than 15 degrees
- Osteoporosis
- Segmental instability (\> 10 degrees angular motion or \>4mm translation)
- Vertebral fractures
- Spinal Infections
- Spinal tumors
- Inflammatory spondyloarthropathy
- Pregnancy or the intent to become pregnant in the following year
- Comorbid conditions contraindicating surgery
- Multiple herniations
- Known allergy to titanium, aluminum or vanadium
- Female patients of childbearing age, who are not willing to use adequate contraception specified as: intrauterine devices, hormonal contraceptives (contraceptive pills, implants, transdermal patches, hormonal vaginal devices or injections with prolonged release). It is accepted in certain cases to include subjects having a sterilized permanent partner or subjects using double barrier contraceptive methods which is a condom combined with a diaphragm.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- ARO Medicallead
Study Sites (1)
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, DK-8000, Denmark
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cody Bunger, MD, DrMedSc
Aarhus University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2013
First Posted
October 28, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 14, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01