NCT01969370

Brief Summary

This study is part of a larger consortium project investigating the validity and best use of next-generation sequencing (in particular, whole exome sequencing, or WES) in clinical care. This sub-project is investigating benefits and harms of providing WES diagnostic and different types of incidental findings to adult patients and parents of pediatric patients who undergo WES because they have symptoms suggesting genetic disease.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
645

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2012

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 16, 2013

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 25, 2013

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

October 16, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

CancerCardiovascular diseaseNeurodegenerative diseaseNeurodevelopmental diseaseDysmorphologyHearing lossOther conditions, including ophthalmic conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Extent of test-specific distress 2 weeks after return of results

    Measured with an adapted version of the multidimensional impact of testing scale (MICRA)

    2 weeks after return of diagnostic results; for adult patient participants who are eligible and who request them, 2 weeks after return of non-medically actionable incidental results

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Change in test-specific distress at 3 and 6 months after return of results

    Adult patient participants: change from 2 weeks after return of diagnostic results to 3 months and 6 months after return of diagnostic results

  • Extent of communication of test results with other people

    2 weeks after return of diagnostic results

  • Extent of information seeking

    2 weeks after consent (T1) and change from T1 to 2 weeks after return of diagnostic results

  • Extent of Decision Regret 2 weeks after consent

    All participants: 2 wks after consent (T1)

  • Extent of Decision Regret 2 weeks after return of results

    All participants: 2 wks after return of diagnostic (dx) results and, for eligible adults who request them, return of incidental results

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental

EXPERIMENTAL

Option to request non-medically actionable incidental information (after receiving education about them)

Behavioral: Experimental

Control

NO INTERVENTION

No option to request non-medically actionable incidental information

Interventions

ExperimentalBEHAVIORAL

Option to request non-medically actionable incidental information (after receiving education about them)

Experimental

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
\- To receive whole exome sequencing in the study, adult or child patients must have a significant chance of having a genetic disorder, as determined by experts on the study team using criteria that depend on the genetic disorder in question. Representative criteria are listed below and will be considered together to determine whether patterns indicate a likely genetic etiology. Cancer * Age of diagnosis * Presence of bilateral (or multiple) cancers * Diagnosis of a rare type of cancer * Details of the family history Cardiovascular Conditions * Certain clinical findings, such as prolonged QT interval on electrocardiogram. * Presence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or aortic aneurysm * Age of diagnosis * Presence of family history Pediatric neurodevelopmental disorders * Specific brain structural brain abnormalities * Presence of certain seizure types * Dysmorphic features

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Rini C, Roche MI, Lin FC, Foreman AKM, Khan CM, Griesemer I, Waltz M, Lee K, O'Daniel JM, Evans JP, Berg JS, Henderson GE. Burden or benefit? Effects of providing education about and the option to request additional genomic findings from diagnostic exome sequencing: A randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Dec;104(12):2989-2998. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsCongenital AbnormalitiesHearing LossNeurodegenerative Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesHearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation Disorders

Study Officials

  • James P Evans, MD, Ph.D

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Gail Henderson, Ph.D

    University of North Carolina

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jonathan S Berg, MD, Ph.D

    University of North Carolina

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Christine Rini, Ph.D

    University of North Carolina

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2013

First Posted

October 25, 2013

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion

March 1, 2017

Study Completion

March 1, 2017

Last Updated

May 3, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Raw genotype calls from whole exome sequencing are shared with the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). Other participant demographic variables include: age of onset, birthplace, sex, race, education level, age. Data is uploaded in batches to the dbGaP website. Currently, the data for 403 participants who have consented for release of their data is available on the dbGaP website. To access data, users must request authorized access by submitting a Data Use Agreement certified by their institution. This is reviewed by the DbGaP Data Access Committee for approval prior to accessing study data. All data that is submitted to dbGaP, including individual participant data, is anonymous.

Locations