NCT01968902

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if Xeomin® will prove effective for significantly improving lower extremity spasticity and will be well tolerated by the majority of MS patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 21, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 24, 2013

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2013

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 27, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 22, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

October 21, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 21, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

spasticitylower limbmultiple sclerosistoxin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean change from injection visit to week 6 in the Modified Ashworth score between Xeomin vs placebo group

    injection visit to week 6

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Mean change from injection visit to week 6 in Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) between Xeomin vs placebo group

    from injection visit to week 6

  • Change in Patient Global impression of change between Xeomin vs placebo group

    change between week 6 and week 12

  • Mean change from injection visit to week 6 in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) physical and psychological scores between Xeomin vs placebo group

    injection visit to week 6

  • Mean change from injection visit to week 6 in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) between Xeomin vs placebo group

    injection visit to week 6

  • Clinical Global impression of change between Xeomin vs placebo group

    change between week 6 and week 12

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

incabotulinumtoxinA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

intramuscular injection, 200 to 400 units, 1 injection visit only

Biological: incabotulinumtoxinA

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

intramuscular injection, saline 200 - 400 units , 1 injection visit only

Biological: Placebo

Interventions

A dose of 200 units to 400 units of Xeomin will be injected by EMG-guided technique into the appropriate muscles in the effected leg at injection visit

Also known as: Xeomin®
incabotulinumtoxinA
PlaceboBIOLOGICAL

Saline injection on the day of injection visit

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female patients with clinically definite MS, either RRMS or a progressive form (SPMS, PPSM, PRMS)
  • Ages 18-65 years.
  • Patients must be in a stable state, with no clinical relapses or methylprednisolone treatments in the last 30 days, or have slowly progressive MS, with an EDSS score of 2.0-6.5.
  • Patients must have functionally significant spasticity in predominantly one lower extremity as determined by a score of \>2 on the Modified Ashworth Scale at screen

You may not qualify if:

  • Unstable medical or neurological disease
  • Known sensitivity to Xeomin
  • Prior injection with any botulinum toxin within 6 months
  • EDSS score of 7.0 or greater
  • Exacerbation of MS within the past 30 days
  • Significant cognitive impairment or psychiatric disease
  • Advanced arthritis or any other cause of clinically significant limitation of passive range of motion around any of the joints being assessed in the study.
  • Concomitant neurologic conditions causing spasticity or rigidity.
  • Has had major surgery within 3 months prior to Screening visit that may affect spasticity assessments such as back, lower leg or knee surgeries.
  • Use of medications that could influence muscle tone or any anti-spasticity medications must be stable \>90 days prior to screening visit and must remain stable throughout study period.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Multiple Sclerosis Center of Northeastern New York

Latham, New York, 12110, United States

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Moore AP. Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) for spasticity in adults. What is the evidence? Eur J Neurol. 2002 May;9 Suppl 1:42-7; dicussion 53-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.0090s1042.x.

    PMID: 11918649BACKGROUND
  • Hesse S, Lucke D, Malezic M, Bertelt C, Friedrich H, Gregoric M, Mauritz KH. Botulinum toxin treatment for lower limb extensor spasticity in chronic hemiparetic patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;57(11):1321-4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.11.1321.

  • Gilmartin R, Bruce D, Storrs BB, Abbott R, Krach L, Ward J, Bloom K, Brooks WH, Johnson DL, Madsen JR, McLaughlin JF, Nadell J. Intrathecal baclofen for management of spastic cerebral palsy: multicenter trial. J Child Neurol. 2000 Feb;15(2):71-7. doi: 10.1177/088307380001500201.

  • Levin AB, Sperling KB. Complications associated with infusion pumps implanted for spasticity. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1995;65(1-4):147-51. doi: 10.1159/000098887.

  • Loubser PG, Narayan RK, Sandin KJ, Donovan WH, Russell KD. Continuous infusion of intrathecal baclofen: long-term effects on spasticity in spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1991 Jan;29(1):48-64. doi: 10.1038/sc.1991.7.

  • de Paiva A, Meunier FA, Molgo J, Aoki KR, Dolly JO. Functional repair of motor endplates after botulinum neurotoxin type A poisoning: biphasic switch of synaptic activity between nerve sprouts and their parent terminals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 16;96(6):3200-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3200.

  • Koman LA, Mooney JF 3rd, Smith BP, Walker F, Leon JM. Botulinum toxin type A neuromuscular blockade in the treatment of lower extremity spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BOTOX Study Group. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Jan-Feb;20(1):108-15.

  • Brashear A, Gordon MF, Elovic E, Kassicieh VD, Marciniak C, Do M, Lee CH, Jenkins S, Turkel C; Botox Post-Stroke Spasticity Study Group. Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of wrist and finger spasticity after a stroke. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 8;347(6):395-400. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011892.

  • Dykstra DD, Sidi AA. Treatment of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia with botulinum A toxin: a double-blind study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Jan;71(1):24-6.

  • Yablon SA, Agana BT, Ivanhoe CB, Boake C. Botulinum toxin in severe upper extremity spasticity among patients with traumatic brain injury: an open-labeled trial. Neurology. 1996 Oct;47(4):939-44. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.4.939.

  • Snow BJ, Tsui JK, Bhatt MH, Varelas M, Hashimoto SA, Calne DB. Treatment of spasticity with botulinum toxin: a double-blind study. Ann Neurol. 1990 Oct;28(4):512-5. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280407.

  • Hyman N, Barnes M, Bhakta B, Cozens A, Bakheit M, Kreczy-Kleedorfer B, Poewe W, Wissel J, Bain P, Glickman S, Sayer A, Richardson A, Dott C. Botulinum toxin (Dysport) treatment of hip adductor spasticity in multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, dose ranging study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;68(6):707-12. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.6.707.

  • Borg-Stein J, Pine ZM, Miller JR, Brin MF. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of spasticity in multiple sclerosis. New observations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Dec;72(6):364-8.

  • Pierson SH, Katz DI, Tarsy D. Botulinum toxin A in the treatment of spasticity: functional implications and patient selection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jul;77(7):717-21. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90015-5.

  • Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: the 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology. 2003 Jan 14;60(1):31-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.60.1.31.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Muscle SpasticityMultiple Sclerosis

Interventions

incobotulinumtoxinA

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDemyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Keith R Edwards, MD

    MS Center of Northeastern New York

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2013

First Posted

October 24, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion

January 27, 2016

Study Completion

December 31, 2016

Last Updated

March 22, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations