Safety of Xeomin for Lower Limb Spasticity in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Incobotulinumtoxin Type A for the Functional Improvement of Lower Extremity Spasticity in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if Xeomin® will prove effective for significantly improving lower extremity spasticity and will be well tolerated by the majority of MS patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Nov 2013
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 27, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2016
CompletedMarch 22, 2017
March 1, 2017
2.2 years
October 21, 2013
March 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean change from injection visit to week 6 in the Modified Ashworth score between Xeomin vs placebo group
injection visit to week 6
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Mean change from injection visit to week 6 in Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) between Xeomin vs placebo group
from injection visit to week 6
Change in Patient Global impression of change between Xeomin vs placebo group
change between week 6 and week 12
Mean change from injection visit to week 6 in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) physical and psychological scores between Xeomin vs placebo group
injection visit to week 6
Mean change from injection visit to week 6 in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) between Xeomin vs placebo group
injection visit to week 6
Clinical Global impression of change between Xeomin vs placebo group
change between week 6 and week 12
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
incabotulinumtoxinA
ACTIVE COMPARATORintramuscular injection, 200 to 400 units, 1 injection visit only
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORintramuscular injection, saline 200 - 400 units , 1 injection visit only
Interventions
A dose of 200 units to 400 units of Xeomin will be injected by EMG-guided technique into the appropriate muscles in the effected leg at injection visit
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients with clinically definite MS, either RRMS or a progressive form (SPMS, PPSM, PRMS)
- Ages 18-65 years.
- Patients must be in a stable state, with no clinical relapses or methylprednisolone treatments in the last 30 days, or have slowly progressive MS, with an EDSS score of 2.0-6.5.
- Patients must have functionally significant spasticity in predominantly one lower extremity as determined by a score of \>2 on the Modified Ashworth Scale at screen
You may not qualify if:
- Unstable medical or neurological disease
- Known sensitivity to Xeomin
- Prior injection with any botulinum toxin within 6 months
- EDSS score of 7.0 or greater
- Exacerbation of MS within the past 30 days
- Significant cognitive impairment or psychiatric disease
- Advanced arthritis or any other cause of clinically significant limitation of passive range of motion around any of the joints being assessed in the study.
- Concomitant neurologic conditions causing spasticity or rigidity.
- Has had major surgery within 3 months prior to Screening visit that may affect spasticity assessments such as back, lower leg or knee surgeries.
- Use of medications that could influence muscle tone or any anti-spasticity medications must be stable \>90 days prior to screening visit and must remain stable throughout study period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Multiple Sclerosis Center of Northeastern New York
Latham, New York, 12110, United States
Related Publications (15)
Moore AP. Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) for spasticity in adults. What is the evidence? Eur J Neurol. 2002 May;9 Suppl 1:42-7; dicussion 53-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.0090s1042.x.
PMID: 11918649BACKGROUNDHesse S, Lucke D, Malezic M, Bertelt C, Friedrich H, Gregoric M, Mauritz KH. Botulinum toxin treatment for lower limb extensor spasticity in chronic hemiparetic patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;57(11):1321-4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.11.1321.
PMID: 7964805RESULTGilmartin R, Bruce D, Storrs BB, Abbott R, Krach L, Ward J, Bloom K, Brooks WH, Johnson DL, Madsen JR, McLaughlin JF, Nadell J. Intrathecal baclofen for management of spastic cerebral palsy: multicenter trial. J Child Neurol. 2000 Feb;15(2):71-7. doi: 10.1177/088307380001500201.
PMID: 10695888RESULTLevin AB, Sperling KB. Complications associated with infusion pumps implanted for spasticity. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1995;65(1-4):147-51. doi: 10.1159/000098887.
PMID: 8916345RESULTLoubser PG, Narayan RK, Sandin KJ, Donovan WH, Russell KD. Continuous infusion of intrathecal baclofen: long-term effects on spasticity in spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1991 Jan;29(1):48-64. doi: 10.1038/sc.1991.7.
PMID: 2023770RESULTde Paiva A, Meunier FA, Molgo J, Aoki KR, Dolly JO. Functional repair of motor endplates after botulinum neurotoxin type A poisoning: biphasic switch of synaptic activity between nerve sprouts and their parent terminals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 16;96(6):3200-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3200.
PMID: 10077661RESULTKoman LA, Mooney JF 3rd, Smith BP, Walker F, Leon JM. Botulinum toxin type A neuromuscular blockade in the treatment of lower extremity spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BOTOX Study Group. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Jan-Feb;20(1):108-15.
PMID: 10641699RESULTBrashear A, Gordon MF, Elovic E, Kassicieh VD, Marciniak C, Do M, Lee CH, Jenkins S, Turkel C; Botox Post-Stroke Spasticity Study Group. Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of wrist and finger spasticity after a stroke. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 8;347(6):395-400. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011892.
PMID: 12167681RESULTDykstra DD, Sidi AA. Treatment of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia with botulinum A toxin: a double-blind study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Jan;71(1):24-6.
PMID: 2297305RESULTYablon SA, Agana BT, Ivanhoe CB, Boake C. Botulinum toxin in severe upper extremity spasticity among patients with traumatic brain injury: an open-labeled trial. Neurology. 1996 Oct;47(4):939-44. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.4.939.
PMID: 8857723RESULTSnow BJ, Tsui JK, Bhatt MH, Varelas M, Hashimoto SA, Calne DB. Treatment of spasticity with botulinum toxin: a double-blind study. Ann Neurol. 1990 Oct;28(4):512-5. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280407.
PMID: 2252363RESULTHyman N, Barnes M, Bhakta B, Cozens A, Bakheit M, Kreczy-Kleedorfer B, Poewe W, Wissel J, Bain P, Glickman S, Sayer A, Richardson A, Dott C. Botulinum toxin (Dysport) treatment of hip adductor spasticity in multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, dose ranging study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;68(6):707-12. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.6.707.
PMID: 10811692RESULTBorg-Stein J, Pine ZM, Miller JR, Brin MF. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of spasticity in multiple sclerosis. New observations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Dec;72(6):364-8.
PMID: 8260129RESULTPierson SH, Katz DI, Tarsy D. Botulinum toxin A in the treatment of spasticity: functional implications and patient selection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jul;77(7):717-21. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90015-5.
PMID: 8670002RESULTHobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: the 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology. 2003 Jan 14;60(1):31-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.60.1.31.
PMID: 12525714RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keith R Edwards, MD
MS Center of Northeastern New York
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2013
First Posted
October 24, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 27, 2016
Study Completion
December 31, 2016
Last Updated
March 22, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03