Safety and Efficacy of Intradermal Trivalent Influenza Vaccination in Institutionalized Older Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Influenza is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Institutionalized older adults (age\>65) is the group associated with highest risk of complications. Influenza vaccines are the cornerstone of influenza prevention but one systematic review has found that there is no statistically significant difference against laboratory confirmed influenza. A major reason is immune senescence in older adults which result in weaker response towards vaccines when compared with young adults. Intradermal administration of vaccine has been suggested to improve immune response due to the abundance of immunostimulatory cells, such as dendritic cells in the dermis. Intradermal administration of influenza vaccine has been shown to have comparable or superior efficacy compared with intramuscular administration in the \>60-year old population and the rates of adverse events post-vaccination were also comparable between them. The immunogenicity of intradermal administration has also been shown to be better in immunocompromised patients, including community dwelling older adults. In addition, intradermal vaccination has good acceptability and safety profile in different countries, so it has been licensed in Hong Kong and worldwide. However, there is little study regarding the efficacy of intradermal vaccination of influenza in institutionalized older adults, investigators therefore would like to perform a prospective, randomized study to compare the safety and immunogenicity between conventional full dose intramuscular immunization and full dose intradermal immunization of the trivalent influenza vaccine in institutionalized older adults. The hypothesis is that full dose intradermal trivalent influenza vaccination is as effective as full-dose standard intramuscular injection in terms of seroconversion and seroprotection rate in institutionalized older adults. Finding of this study will be important in the vaccination of institutionalized older adults and immunocompromised patients as intradermal vaccine may induce a better immune response against influenza infection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Oct 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 22, 2013
October 1, 2013
7 months
October 16, 2013
October 17, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in neutralization antibody titre against influenza
Neutralization antibody titre against the 3 influenza viruses are tested 3 times at day 0, day 21 and day 180 of vaccination for comparison. The titer of neutralization antibody is defined as the maximum dilution of serum at which the percentage of cytopathic effect is less than or equal to 50%.
day 0 (baseline), day 21 and day 180 of vaccination
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Adverse effects
day 0 and day 7 of vaccination
Study Arms (2)
Intanza
EXPERIMENTALintradermal injection (15ug hemagglutinin 2013/2014 trivalent influenza vaccine) delivered with the Intanza, single dose injection
Vaxigrip
ACTIVE COMPARATORintramuscular injection (15ug hemagglutinin 2013/2014 trivalent influenza vaccine) delivered with the Vaxigrip, single dose injection
Interventions
Principal Investigator would be responsible for injecting the intradermal vaccine in a sterile technique.
Principal Investigator would be responsible for injecting the intrmuscular vaccine in a sterile technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Institutionalized older adult patients at the age of 65 or above
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant immune-related diseases and significant recent co-morbidities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen Mary Hospital and Fung Yiu King Hospital, Hong Kong West Cluster, Hospital Authority
Hong Kong, China
Related Publications (1)
Chan TC, Hung IF, Chan KH, Li CP, Li PT, Luk JK, Chu LW, Chan FH. Immunogenicity and safety of intradermal trivalent influenza vaccination in nursing home older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Aug;15(8):607.e5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
PMID: 24957950DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tuen Ching Chan, MBBS
The University of Hong Kong, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2013
First Posted
October 22, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 22, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10