NCT01967290

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to determine the impact of vibratory feedback on the quality and intensity of a common motor rehabilitation task of the upper-arm (hand-to-mouth) in stroke patients. For that purpose the investigators use the SWORD system that combines 3D motion quantification wearable sensors and a vibratory module. The investigators hypothesize that vibratory stimuli during a motor rehabilitation task increase significantly the number of correct movements performed per unit of time. The design of the study is a cross-over randomized clinical trial. With the SWORD system in place each patient will perform the hand-to-mouth task twice (with vibratory feedback and without it), the order being random. The number of correct movements and other motor outcomes will be assessed continuously under both conditions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2013

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 18, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2013

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

November 28, 2013

Status Verified

November 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

October 18, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 27, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

strokemotor deficitsmotor rehabilitationneurorehabilitationmedical deviceswearable devicese-health systems

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of correct movements

    Number of correct movements performed within the duration of each hand-to-mouth task.

    At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Total number of movements

    At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.

  • Range of motion in degrees

    At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.

  • Time between correct movements in seconds

    At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.

  • Cumulative amplitude of correct movements in degrees

    At the end of each hand-to-mouth task

  • Cumulative amplitude of all movements performed in degrees

    At the end of each hand-to-mouth task.

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Hand-to-mouth task - vibratory feedback

EXPERIMENTAL

Hand-to-mouth task under vibratory feedback and 3D movement analysis. The SWORD device is in place over the patient arm, performs continuous 3D movement analysis and provides vibratory feedback according to quality performance settings established by the clinician after patient assessment. If movement is of lower amplitude or slower than prescribed a vibratory stimulus is delivered at the wrist of the patient. The intervention is repeated on the hemiparetic and normal sides and the duration of the task is defined according to the patient cardiovascular status.

Device: Vibratory feedback and 3D movement analysis

Hand-to-mouth task - no vibratory feedback

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Hand-to-mouth task in the same conditions as the experimental arm but without vibratory feedback, only 3D movement analysis. The SWORD device is in place over the patient arm, performs continuous 3D movement analysis but does not provides vibratory feedback according to quality performance settings established by the clinician after patient assessment. If movement is of lower amplitude or slower than prescribed NO vibratory stimulus is delivered at the wrist of the patient. The intervention is repeated on the hemiparetic and normal sides and the duration of the task is defined according to the patient cardiovascular status.

Device: Only 3D movement analysis

Interventions

Hand-to-mouth task performed under vibratory feedback combined with 3D continuous movement analysis.

Also known as: Propriocetive actuation, Vibratory stimulation, SWORD, Stroke Wearable Operative Rehabilitation Device
Hand-to-mouth task - vibratory feedback

Hand-to-mouth task performed under 3D continuous movement analysis only

Also known as: 3D movement quantification, 3D movement characterization, SWORD, Stroke Wearable Operative Rehabilitation Device
Hand-to-mouth task - no vibratory feedback

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • More than 18 years old at stroke onset, with no superior age limit;
  • Medical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke;
  • First ever stroke;
  • Previously independent, defined as having a modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0-1;
  • Clinical and CT or MRI compatible with a medial cerebral artery ischemic lesion;
  • Confirmed motor deficit on the upper limb but not plegia (able to actively extend wrist, thumb, and at least 2 other digits \>10°), defined as a score between 0 and 2 on items 5a or 5b of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale;
  • Inpatients, within no more than 4 weeks after stroke onset;
  • Medically stable, no intravenous medication and already able to sit for more than one hour comfortably;
  • Favourable opinion of the attending stroke physician;
  • Patient and caregiver understand the purpose of the study and provided written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • No detectable motor deficits at baseline assessment by the neurologist;
  • Severe aphasia;
  • Dementia (any stage);
  • Other cognitive or psychiatric comorbidity that impairs communication or compliance with the tasks;
  • Severe respiratory or cardiac condition incompatible with more than one minute of continuous mild exercise (e.g. combing hair) in a sitting position;
  • Pain that limits upper limb movement either on the normal or affected side;
  • Upper limb amputation or severe deformity either on the normal or affected side;
  • Fixed articular limitations of upper limb either on the normal or affected side;
  • Enrollment in other trial in the previous 3 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Rehabilitation Department, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave, EPE

Guimarães, 4835-044, Portugal

Location

Neurology Department, CHEDV

Santa Maria da Feira, 4520-211, Portugal

Location

Rehabilitation Department, CHEDV

Santa Maria da Feira, 4520-211, Portugal

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Bento VF, Cruz VT, Ribeiro DD, Cunha JP. The vibratory stimulus as a neurorehabilitation tool for stroke patients: proof of concept and tolerability test. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;30(4):287-93. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0757.

    PMID: 22672942BACKGROUND
  • Bento VF, Cruz VT, Ribeiro DD, Cunha JP. Towards a movement quantification system capable of automatic evaluation of upper limb motor function after neurological injury. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:5456-60. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091392.

    PMID: 22255572BACKGROUND
  • Bento VF, Cruz VT, Ribeiro DD, Colunas MM, Cunha JP. The SWORD tele-rehabilitation system. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;177:76-81.

    PMID: 22942034BACKGROUND
  • Bento VF, Cruz VT, Ribeiro DD, Branco C, Coutinho P. The potential of motion quantification systems in the automatic evaluation of motor function after stroke. Int J Stroke. 2013 Aug;8(6):E37. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12111. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23879761BACKGROUND
  • Cruz VT, Bento V, Ruano L, Ribeiro DD, Fontao L, Mateus C, Barreto R, Colunas M, Alves A, Cruz B, Branco C, Rocha NP, Coutinho P. Motor task performance under vibratory feedback early poststroke: single center, randomized, cross-over, controlled clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2014 Jul 11;4:5670. doi: 10.1038/srep05670.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ischemic StrokeStrokeNeurologic Manifestations

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Vítor T. Cruz, MD

    Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Paula Coutinho, PhD

    IBMC - University of Oporto

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2013

First Posted

October 22, 2013

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

October 1, 2013

Study Completion

November 1, 2013

Last Updated

November 28, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-11

Locations