Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome With DNAFirst
DNAFirst
DNAFirst: Primary Screening for Down Syndrome by Maternal Plasma DNA
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will explore how maternal plasma circulating cell free DNA (ccfDNA) can be used as a primary screening test for Down syndrome as part of routine clinical care in the general pregnancy population. Plasma ccfDNA testing is currently recommended only for use as a secondary screen for 'high-risk' women (i.e., women whose risk factors for trisomy make them candidates for invasive testing such as chorionic villous sampling or amniocentesis). Because most women in this 'high-risk' category are carrying unaffected fetuses, many 'unnecessary' procedures are completed in order to identify the few women whose fetuses have a chromosomal disorder. This creates expense, anxiety, and most importantly, loss of unaffected fetuses due to procedure related miscarriage. Plasma DNA testing is now being used to reduce significantly the number of women with unaffected fetuses undergoing invasive testing. Applying such testing as a 'first-line' screen has not been well-explored, despite calls from several clinical professional societies to do so. The investigators intent is to introduce, under carefully monitored conditions, ccfDNA testing through Rhode Island primary prenatal practices to the general pregnancy population. Education/orientation of prenatal care providers, their staffs, and their patients will be carefully orchestrated, and implementation issues identified and addressed. Telephone surveys of consented patients will elicit responses to their understanding of the test, their satisfaction with the process, and a comparison of their experience with serum screening in a prior pregnancy. Knowledge gained from this study will help validate new screening paradigms involving ccfDNA testing. The study is not designed to estimate Down syndrome detection rates with any confidence, but can provide information on uptake rates, failure rates, screen positive rates, and the decision-making of women with positive test results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 22, 2018
February 1, 2018
1.1 years
October 17, 2013
February 19, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient satisfaction with ccfDNA testing as a primary screen for aneuploidy
A telephone survey will be administered to women who have undergone ccfDNA testing (DNAFirst) and who have provided written permission to be contacted specifically for this purpose.Included will be questions designed to elicit understanding of the results, implications of positive and negative results, comparison with earlier serum-screening experience, and reasons for accepting/declining ancillary testing (sex aneuploidy).
within 90 days of receiving ccfDNA screening results
Study Arms (1)
Surveyed DNAFirst users
Women who opted for DNAFirst testing and who provided written permission (attested by signature and provision of telephone number)for DNAFirst Study staff to telephone them and conduct a brief telephone survey about their experiences.
Eligibility Criteria
Women with a singleton pregnancy at 10 weeks or later who agree to be contacted by telephone to provide consent and participate in a structured survey to assess comprehension and satisfaction with their experience.
You may qualify if:
- at least 10 weeks pregnant
- opting for DNAFirst testing
- written permission to be contacted by telephone
- providing a usable phone number for contact
- consenting (verbally) to telephone survey
You may not qualify if:
- screen positive DNAFirst result
- non-English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Islandlead
- Natera, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States
Related Publications (5)
Palomaki GE, Kloza EM, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Haddow JE, Neveux LM, Ehrich M, van den Boom D, Bombard AT, Deciu C, Grody WW, Nelson SF, Canick JA. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: an international clinical validation study. Genet Med. 2011 Nov;13(11):913-20. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182368a0e.
PMID: 22005709BACKGROUNDPalomaki GE, Deciu C, Kloza EM, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Haddow JE, Neveux LM, Ehrich M, van den Boom D, Bombard AT, Grody WW, Nelson SF, Canick JA. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study. Genet Med. 2012 Mar;14(3):296-305. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.73. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
PMID: 22281937BACKGROUNDNorton ME, Rose NC, Benn P. Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: clinical assessment and a plea for restraint. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):847-850. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828642c6.
PMID: 23635685BACKGROUNDPalomaki GE, Kloza EM, O'Brien BM, Eklund EE, Lambert-Messerlian GM. The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population. Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):778-786. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.194. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
PMID: 28079901RESULTPalomaki GE, Ashwood ER, Best RG, Lambert-Messerlian G, Knight GJ. Is maternal plasma DNA testing impacting serum-based screening for aneuploidy in the United States? Genet Med. 2015 Nov;17(11):897-900. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.39. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
PMID: 25834952DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Glenn E Palomaki, PhD
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2013
First Posted
October 22, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 22, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02