NCT01966991

Brief Summary

This study will explore how maternal plasma circulating cell free DNA (ccfDNA) can be used as a primary screening test for Down syndrome as part of routine clinical care in the general pregnancy population. Plasma ccfDNA testing is currently recommended only for use as a secondary screen for 'high-risk' women (i.e., women whose risk factors for trisomy make them candidates for invasive testing such as chorionic villous sampling or amniocentesis). Because most women in this 'high-risk' category are carrying unaffected fetuses, many 'unnecessary' procedures are completed in order to identify the few women whose fetuses have a chromosomal disorder. This creates expense, anxiety, and most importantly, loss of unaffected fetuses due to procedure related miscarriage. Plasma DNA testing is now being used to reduce significantly the number of women with unaffected fetuses undergoing invasive testing. Applying such testing as a 'first-line' screen has not been well-explored, despite calls from several clinical professional societies to do so. The investigators intent is to introduce, under carefully monitored conditions, ccfDNA testing through Rhode Island primary prenatal practices to the general pregnancy population. Education/orientation of prenatal care providers, their staffs, and their patients will be carefully orchestrated, and implementation issues identified and addressed. Telephone surveys of consented patients will elicit responses to their understanding of the test, their satisfaction with the process, and a comparison of their experience with serum screening in a prior pregnancy. Knowledge gained from this study will help validate new screening paradigms involving ccfDNA testing. The study is not designed to estimate Down syndrome detection rates with any confidence, but can provide information on uptake rates, failure rates, screen positive rates, and the decision-making of women with positive test results.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 17, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

February 22, 2018

Status Verified

February 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

October 17, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 19, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Down syndromeprenatal screeningtrisomy 21patient satisfaction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient satisfaction with ccfDNA testing as a primary screen for aneuploidy

    A telephone survey will be administered to women who have undergone ccfDNA testing (DNAFirst) and who have provided written permission to be contacted specifically for this purpose.Included will be questions designed to elicit understanding of the results, implications of positive and negative results, comparison with earlier serum-screening experience, and reasons for accepting/declining ancillary testing (sex aneuploidy).

    within 90 days of receiving ccfDNA screening results

Study Arms (1)

Surveyed DNAFirst users

Women who opted for DNAFirst testing and who provided written permission (attested by signature and provision of telephone number)for DNAFirst Study staff to telephone them and conduct a brief telephone survey about their experiences.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Women with a singleton pregnancy at 10 weeks or later who agree to be contacted by telephone to provide consent and participate in a structured survey to assess comprehension and satisfaction with their experience.

You may qualify if:

  • at least 10 weeks pregnant
  • opting for DNAFirst testing
  • written permission to be contacted by telephone
  • providing a usable phone number for contact
  • consenting (verbally) to telephone survey

You may not qualify if:

  • screen positive DNAFirst result
  • non-English speaking

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Palomaki GE, Kloza EM, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Haddow JE, Neveux LM, Ehrich M, van den Boom D, Bombard AT, Deciu C, Grody WW, Nelson SF, Canick JA. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: an international clinical validation study. Genet Med. 2011 Nov;13(11):913-20. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182368a0e.

    PMID: 22005709BACKGROUND
  • Palomaki GE, Deciu C, Kloza EM, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Haddow JE, Neveux LM, Ehrich M, van den Boom D, Bombard AT, Grody WW, Nelson SF, Canick JA. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study. Genet Med. 2012 Mar;14(3):296-305. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.73. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

    PMID: 22281937BACKGROUND
  • Norton ME, Rose NC, Benn P. Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: clinical assessment and a plea for restraint. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):847-850. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828642c6.

    PMID: 23635685BACKGROUND
  • Palomaki GE, Kloza EM, O'Brien BM, Eklund EE, Lambert-Messerlian GM. The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population. Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):778-786. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.194. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

  • Palomaki GE, Ashwood ER, Best RG, Lambert-Messerlian G, Knight GJ. Is maternal plasma DNA testing impacting serum-based screening for aneuploidy in the United States? Genet Med. 2015 Nov;17(11):897-900. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.39. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Down SyndromeTrisomy 18 SyndromeTrisomy 13 SyndromeTurner SyndromePatient Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intellectual DisabilityNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAbnormalities, MultipleCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesChromosome DisordersGenetic Diseases, InbornHeart Defects, CongenitalCardiovascular AbnormalitiesCardiovascular DiseasesHeart DiseasesGonadal DysgenesisDisorders of Sex DevelopmentUrogenital AbnormalitiesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesSex Chromosome Disorders of Sex DevelopmentMale Urogenital DiseasesSex Chromosome DisordersGonadal DisordersEndocrine System DiseasesTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Glenn E Palomaki, PhD

    Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2013

First Posted

October 22, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

July 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

February 22, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-02

Locations