Comparison of Three Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Internal Jugular Cannulation
OISO-1
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of three ultrasound assistance techniques for internal jugular venous cannulation, in terms of cannulation success and prevention of complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 28, 2016
CompletedAugust 1, 2016
June 1, 2016
1 year
October 11, 2013
May 19, 2016
June 30, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cannulation Success
Cannulation will be considered as "successful" once a flexible guidewire has been inserted into the internal jugular vein during the first 180 seconds from the moment the Seldinger needle pierces the skin. If time spent until guidewire insertion is more than 180 seconds, or if guidewire cannot be inserted into the internal jugular vein chosen, cannulation will be considered "unsuccessful". This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process.
At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Number of Cannulation Attempts
At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)
First Attempt Cannulation
At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)
Cannulation Time
At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)
Mechanical Complications
At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)
Infectious Complications
Once the central venous catheter is withdrawn (2 months)
Study Arms (3)
Long axis, in-plane needle
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach Long axis, in-plane needle: Jugular vein is ultrasonographically visualized in a longitudinal fashion (long axis) and the needle is inserted in the same ultrasound plane, aligned with the longitudinal axis of the transducer.
Short axis, out-of-plane needle
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach Short axis, out-of-plane needle: Jugular vein is ultrasonographically visualized in a transverse fashion (short axis) and the needle is inserted perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the transducer (out-of-plane).
Oblique axis, in-plane needle
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach Oblique axis, in-plane needle: Jugular vein is ultrasonographically visualized in an oblique axis (intermediate view between long and short axis) and the needle is inserted in the same ultrasound plane, aligned with the longitudinal axis of the transducer.
Interventions
The physician will use an ultrasound machine to perform an ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous cannulation: the needle and the vein will be visualized in real time in the ultrasound image to make the cannulation process easier and safer. In each one of three study arms, however, the ultrasound approach will be different depending on the axis on wich the vein is visualized (longitudinal, transversal or oblique) and the way the needle enters the ultrasound plane (in-plane or out of plane).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 or older
- Indication for internal jugular venous cannulation, previously established by the doctor responsible for the patient´s hospital diagnosis and treatment
- Informed consent for trial participation has been obtained from the patient
You may not qualify if:
- Infection signs at or close to puncture site
- Cutaneous erosions or subcutaneous haematoma at or close to puncture site
- History of internal jugular venous cannulation during the past 72 hours (in the same side in which the present cannulation is taking place)
- History of previous surgical interventions on the cannulation site
- Recent cervical trauma with present neck immobilization and without having ruled out eventual cervical spinal injury
- Severe coagulopathy (altered coagulation parameters and active bleeding) which cannot be promptly corrected by platelet, fresh frozen plasma or pharmacologic intervention
- Subcutaneous emphysema with cervical extension
- Agitated or uncooperative patient (including deep sedation)
- Inability to obtain formal informed consent from the patient or his legally authorized representative (in case the patient is legally incompetent to give informed consent)
- Cannulation being performed outside the surgical area or the post-anesthesia care unit
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mikel Batllorilead
- Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Anesthesiology department
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008, Spain
Related Publications (14)
Eisen LA, Narasimhan M, Berger JS, Mayo PH, Rosen MJ, Schneider RF. Mechanical complications of central venous catheters. J Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):40-6. doi: 10.1177/0885066605280884.
PMID: 16698743BACKGROUNDMaecken T, Grau T. Ultrasound imaging in vascular access. Crit Care Med. 2007 May;35(5 Suppl):S178-85. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260629.86351.A5.
PMID: 17446777BACKGROUNDKarakitsos D, Labropoulos N, De Groot E, Patrianakos AP, Kouraklis G, Poularas J, Samonis G, Tsoutsos DA, Konstadoulakis MM, Karabinis A. Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R162. doi: 10.1186/cc5101.
PMID: 17112371BACKGROUNDMilling TJ Jr, Rose J, Briggs WM, Birkhahn R, Gaeta TJ, Bove JJ, Melniker LA. Randomized, controlled clinical trial of point-of-care limited ultrasonography assistance of central venous cannulation: the Third Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP-3) Trial. Crit Care Med. 2005 Aug;33(8):1764-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000171533.92856.e5.
PMID: 16096454BACKGROUNDHind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, Thomas S. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361.
PMID: 12919984BACKGROUNDShojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Markowitz AJ. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001;(43):i-x, 1-668.
PMID: 11510252BACKGROUNDHessel EA 2nd. Con: we should not enforce the use of ultrasound as a standard of care for obtaining central venous access. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Oct;23(5):725-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.06.020. No abstract available.
PMID: 19789059BACKGROUNDAugoustides JG, Cheung AT. Pro: ultrasound should be the standard of care for central catheter insertion. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Oct;23(5):720-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Aug 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 19686963BACKGROUNDBlaivas M, Adhikari S. An unseen danger: frequency of posterior vessel wall penetration by needles during attempts to place internal jugular vein central catheters using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med. 2009 Aug;37(8):2345-9; quiz 2359. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a067d4.
PMID: 19531950BACKGROUNDMoon CH, Blehar D, Shear MA, Uyehara P, Gaspari RJ, Arnold J, Cukor J. Incidence of posterior vessel wall puncture during ultrasound-guided vessel cannulation in a simulated model. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17(10):1138-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00869.x.
PMID: 21069895BACKGROUNDStone MB, Moon C, Sutijono D, Blaivas M. Needle tip visualization during ultrasound-guided vascular access: short-axis vs long-axis approach. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;28(3):343-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.11.022. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
PMID: 20223394BACKGROUNDChittoodan S, Breen D, O'Donnell BD, Iohom G. Long versus short axis ultrasound guided approach for internal jugular vein cannulation: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Med Ultrason. 2011 Mar;13(1):21-5.
PMID: 21390339BACKGROUNDPhelan M, Hagerty D. The oblique view: an alternative approach for ultrasound-guided central line placement. J Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;37(4):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.02.061. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
PMID: 18829208BACKGROUNDBatllori M, Urra M, Uriarte E, Romero C, Pueyo J, Lopez-Olaondo L, Cambra K, Ibanez B. Randomized comparison of three transducer orientation approaches for ultrasound guided internal jugular venous cannulation. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Mar;116(3):370-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev399. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
PMID: 26705350DERIVED
Related Links
Limitations and Caveats
Results may be only extrapolative to experienced cannulators
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Mikel Batllori
- Organization
- Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mikel Batllori, MD
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Anesthesiology department
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Mikel Batllori Gaston, MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2013
First Posted
October 21, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 1, 2016
Results First Posted
June 28, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06