Study Stopped
1\. The simulator lacked the fidelity required to meet training needs of the novices, 2. Recruitment of novice anesthetists more difficult than anticipated
A Trial to Determine the Effect of Simulation Based Training on Initial Performance of Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade in a Clinical Setting
Randomised Control Trial to Determine the Effect of Simulation Based Training on Initial Performance of Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade in a Clinical Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Investigators hypothesize that virtual reality based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training (using cadaveric dissection and human volunteers) in preparing novice anaesthetists to perform their first Ultrasound guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade (USgABPB) in the clinical setting. Investigators hope that this body of work will aid the development of a visuo-haptic simulator used to improved training of doctors in performing USgABPB. Ultimately any patient having this procedure carried out in the future should benefit. In particular it will avoid the need for novice trainees to practice new techniques on patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2010
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2013
CompletedFebruary 2, 2016
February 1, 2016
4 months
October 11, 2013
February 1, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
positive total of procedural checklist items
Yes or No which of the following elements were performed 1. Conducts clear pre-procedural consultation with patient 2. Obtains informed consent 3. Secures IV Access 4. Applies appropriate monitoring 5. Prepares equipment and emergency drugs appropriate for standard regional anaesthesia procedures 6. Selects appropriate local anaesthetic agents 7. Works with trained assistant 8. Prepares sterile Regional Trolley 9. Selects linear broadband transducer with 5-13MHz frequency 10. Uses US coupling gel and sterile cover 11. Uses 50 mm needle 12. Positions patient semi recumbent with head supported for comfort 13. Positions operative arm in-90° abduction and externally rotates and supports in comfortable position 14. Elevates bed position to appropriate level 15. Positions the performer and US screen on the operative side with the screen cephalad to the trolley etc...(limited by character count)
As assessed by retrospective video analysis of procedure (from patient positioning to assessment of adequacy of block) by two blinded experts (within 6 months of procedure)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
procedural times
(During procedure) From patient and equipment positioning to assessment of adequacy of block
number of needle passes
during the procedure
block success
within 15 mins of the procedure
participating anaesthetist confidence levels
immediately following performance of the USgABPB (within 30 minutes)
patient satisfaction measure
prior to discharge from the post anaesthesia care unit (recovery room) - (not more than 2 hours following completion of surgical procedure requiring anaesthesia)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Traditional Training Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThese subjects will be offered multimodal training. This will be comprised of demonstration by suitably trained individuals of relevant anatomy using pre-existing cadaveric samples, performing ultrasound scans of the relevant areas on volunteers under expert supervision, and the practice of needle insertion under ultrasound-guidance using commonly used tissue phantoms (turkey breasts).
Simulation Training Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn addition to traditional training the SG group will participate in a period of simulator based training. Following initial familiarization with the simulator these participants will identify relevant structures and follow their course in the virtual arm. They will insert a virtual needle into the virtual environment and advance it using an in-plane technique towards various target structures. They will be given immediate directed computer generated feedback and offered the opportunity for repetitive, deliberate practice. The simulator, which these participants will use, will comprise of a PHANTOM Desktop (http://www.sensable.com/), an haptic immersive workbench and the H3D API (http://www.sensegraphics.se/). The SG subject will scan and perform procedure specific tasks on a virtual arm. Training will continue until they reach proficiency levels set by experts using the same simulator.
Interventions
In addition to traditional training (as delivered to participants in the Traditional Training Group), participants in the Simulation Training Group will receive the following:- Following initial familiarization with the simulator SG participants will identify relevant structures and follow their course in the virtual arm. They will insert a virtual needle into the virtual environment and advance it using an in-plane technique towards various target structures. They will be given immediate directed computer generated feedback and offered the opportunity for repetitive, deliberate practice. The simulator, which SG participants will use, will comprise of a PHANTOM Desktop (http://www.sensable.com/), an haptic immersive workbench and the H3D API (http://www.sensegraphics.se/). The SG subject will scan and perform procedure specific tasks on a virtual arm. Training will continue until they reach proficiency levels set by experts using the same device
Subjects will be offered standardized multimodal training. This will be comprised of demonstration by suitably trained individuals of relevant anatomy using pre-existing cadaveric samples, performing ultrasound scans of the relevant areas on volunteers under expert supervision, and the practice of needle insertion under ultrasound-guidance using commonly used tissue phantoms (turkey breasts).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA grades I and II
- Age 18-80 years
- Capacity to consent
- Already consented for ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade
- Body Mass index 20 - 26
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to regional anaesthesia
- Language barrier
- Psychiatric history
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cork University Hospital
Cork, Cork, Ireland
Related Publications (1)
O'Sullivan O, Iohom G, O'Donnell BD, Shorten GD. The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting - a pilot study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov 26;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-110. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25844062DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
George Shorten, PhD
Cork University Hospital & University College Cork
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Fellow, Department of Anaesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2013
First Posted
October 18, 2013
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
November 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 2, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02