NCT01964261

Brief Summary

This research study is being conducted to develop a brain controlled medical device, called a brain-machine interface. The device will provide people with a spinal cord injury some ability to control an external device such as a computer cursor or robotic limb by using their thoughts along with sensory feedback. Development of a brain-machine interface is very difficult and currently only limited technology exists in this area of neuroscience. Other studies have shown that people with high spinal cord injury still have intact brain areas capable of planning movements and grasps, but are not able to execute the movement plans. The device in this study involves implanting very fine recording electrodes into areas of the brain that are known to create arm movement plans and provide hand grasping information and sense feeling in the hand and fingers. These movement and grasp plans would then normally be sent to other regions of the brain to execute the actual movements. By tying into those pathways and sending the movement plan signals to a computer instead, the investigators can translate the movement plans into actual movements by a computer cursor or robotic limb. A key part of this study is to electrically stimulate the brain by introducing a small amount of electrical current into the electrodes in the sensory area of the brain. This will result in the sensation of touch in the hand and/or fingers. This stimulation to the brain will occur when the robotic limb touches the object, thereby allowing the brain to "feel" what the robotic arm is touching. The device being used in this study is called the Neuroport Array and is surgically implanted in the brain. This device and the implantation procedure are experimental which means that it has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). One Neuroport Array consists of a small grid of electrodes that will be implanted in brain tissue and a small cable that runs from the electrode grid to a small hourglass-shaped pedestal. This pedestal is designed to be attached to the skull and protrude through the scalp to allow for connection with the computer equipment. The top portion of the pedestal has a protective cover that will be in place when the pedestal is not in use. The top of this pedestal and its protective cover will be visible on the outside of the head. Three Neuroport Arrays and pedestals will be implanted in this study so three of these protective covers will be visible outside of the head. It will be possible to cover these exposed portions of the device with a hat or scarf. The investigators hope to learn how safe and effective the Neuroport array plus stimulation is in controlling computer generated images and real world objects, such as a robotic arm, using imagined movements of the arms and hands.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
9mo left

Started Nov 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress94%
Nov 2013Jan 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 15, 2013

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 17, 2013

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2013

Completed
12.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2026

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2027

Last Updated

May 22, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12.8 years

First QC Date

October 15, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

NeuralProstheticBrain machine interfacebrain computer interfacebrain controlparalysistetraplegiaquadriplegiaspinal cord injurystimulationsensory feedback

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient control over the end effector (virtual or physical)

    The primary effectiveness objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the NPS2 in controlling virtual or physical end effectors. Signals from posterior parietal cortex will allow the subject to control the end effector with accuracy significantly greater than chance; the subject will be able to perceive and discriminate ICMS above the level of chance; and,incorporating stimulation will improve the subject's control over the end effector. We will evaluate the effectiveness of the NPS2 primarily by calculating the accuracy of the subjects' control over the end effector with and without ICMS, and comparing these different accuracies to the chance level, and to each other. Each subject will serve as his or her own control.

    Nine years after array implantation

  • Absence of infection or irritation

    The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of the NPS2. Implantation will not be associated with infection or irritation, and that the serious adverse event rate will not rise above 1%. We will evaluate the safety of the NPS2 by inspecting the subjects' scalps for evidence of reddening or discharge, by performing regularly scheduled neurologic history and physical exam, and by obtaining feedback from the subjects. The condition of the area will be compared with its condition on previous visits, history will be obtained regarding new symptoms and neurological and physical exam will be compared to baseline exams.

    Nine years after array implantation

Study Arms (1)

Neural Prosthetic System 2

EXPERIMENTAL

The Neural Prosthetic System 2 consists of three Neuroport Arrays, which are described in detail in the intervention description. Two of the three Neuroport Arrays are inserted into the posterior parietal cortex, an area of the brain used in reach and grasp planning. The third Neuroport Array is inserted into somatosensory cortex, specifically S1 which represents sensory feedback for the hand and fingers. The arrays are inserted and the percutaneous pedestal is attached to the skull during a surgical procedure. Following surgical recovery the subject will participate in study sessions 3-5 times per week in which they will learn to control an end effector by thought augmented with sensory feedback via intracortical microstimulation. They will then use the end effector to perform various reach and grasp tasks.

Device: Neural Prosthetic System 2 (NPS2)

Interventions

The NPS2 comprises 3 NeuroPort Arrays (SIROF). The tip of the electrodes are sputtered iridium oxide film (SIROF). Each array is comprised of 100 1.5 mm microelectrodes organized on a 4mm x 4mm silicon base that is 0.25 mm thick. Each microelectrode is insulated with Parylene-C polymer and is electrically isolated from neighboring electrodes by non-conducting glass. Of the 100 electrodes, 96 are wire bonded using 25m gold alloy insulated wires sealed with a silicone elastomer. The wire bundle is potted to a printed circuit board with epoxy, the circuit board is inserted into the Patient Pedestal (percutaneous connector), and then the Patient Pedestal is filled with silicone elastomer. Two fine platinum reference wires are also attached to the Patient Pedestal. The Patient Pedestal is 19 mm wide at the skin interface.

Also known as: NeuroPort Array
Neural Prosthetic System 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • High cervical spinal lesion
  • Age 22-65
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Able to understand and comply with instructions in English
  • Communicate via speech
  • Surgical clearance
  • Life expectancy greater than 12 months
  • Travel up to 60 miles to study locations up to five days per week
  • Caregiver monitor for surgical site complications and behavioral changes on a daily basis
  • Psychosocial support system

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of memory problems
  • Intellectual impairment
  • Psychotic illness or chronic psychiatric disorder, including major depression if untreated
  • Poor visual acuity
  • Pregnancy
  • Active infection or unexplained fever
  • Scalp lesions or skin breakdown
  • HIV or AIDS infection
  • Active cancer or chemotherapy
  • Diabetes
  • Autonomic dysreflexia
  • History of seizure
  • Implanted hydrocephalus shunt
  • Previous neurosurgical history affecting parietal lobe function
  • Medical conditions contraindicating surgery and chronic implantation of a medical device
  • +9 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center

Downey, California, 90242, United States

RECRUITING

University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States

RECRUITING

Richard Andersen

Pasadena, California, 91125, United States

RECRUITING

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • Bashford L, Rosenthal IA, Kellis S, Bjanes D, Pejsa K, Brunton BW, Andersen RA. Neural subspaces of imagined movements in parietal cortex remain stable over several years in humans. J Neural Eng. 2024 Aug 28;21(4):046059. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad6e19.

  • Armenta Salas M, Bashford L, Kellis S, Jafari M, Jo H, Kramer D, Shanfield K, Pejsa K, Lee B, Liu CY, Andersen RA. Proprioceptive and cutaneous sensations in humans elicited by intracortical microstimulation. Elife. 2018 Apr 10;7:e32904. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32904.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

QuadriplegiaParalysisSpinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSpinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Richard A Andersen, PhD

    California Institute of Technology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Charles Liu, MD, PhD

    University of Southern California, Rancho Los Amigos Rehabilitation Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dan Kramer, MD

    University of Colorado, Denver

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Luke Bashford, PhD

    University of Colorado, Denver

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Charles Liu, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Richard Andersen, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
James G. Boswell Professor of Neuroscience

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2013

First Posted

October 17, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2027

Last Updated

May 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Locations