Comparison Between Radiofrequency Ablation and Hypofractionated Proton Beam Radiation for Recurrent/Residual HCC
A Randomized Phase III Study of the Comparison Between Radiofrequency Ablation and Hypofractionated Proton Beam Radiation in Patients With Recurrent/Residual Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (APROH Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
144
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This phase 3 study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the comparison between radiofrequency ablation and hypofractionated proton beam radiation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 13, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2020
CompletedOctober 6, 2020
October 1, 2020
6.3 years
October 13, 2013
October 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
local progression-free survival(LPES)
To evaluate the local progression-free survival for 2 years
up to 2 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
disease-free survival (DFS)
up to 2 years until study closed
Other Outcomes (1)
overall survival (OS)
up to 2 years until study closed
Study Arms (2)
A(radiofrequency ablation )
EXPERIMENTALradiofrequency ablation
B(Proton)
EXPERIMENTALhypofractionated proton beam therapy
Interventions
\* RFA(radiofrequency ablation ) * RFA electrode: Cool-tip RF ablation system (Covidien plc, 20 Lower Hatch Street Dublin 2, Ireland) and Well-Point RF Electrode (STARmed, Koea) * performed using either the manufacturer's standard algorithm or an interactive algorithm, with the latter being used when the impedance did not begin to increase at the midinterval of the standard algorithm * the duration of a single RFA session was 10 min to 15 min.
\* Proton 66 GyE /10 fx, 6.6 GyE fraction dose, 5 days/week, for HCC free from the alimentary tract (i.e., stomach, duodenum, esophagus, small and large bowel) (more than 2cm from clinical target volume),TLV30\<40%,and/orRLV30\<30%)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HCC diagnosed as (i) the presence of risk factors including hepatitis B or C virus and liver cirrhosis, a serum a-fetoprotein (AFP) level greater than 200 IU/ml and a radiologically compatible feature with HCC in one or more CT/MRI/angiograms, or (ii) the presence of risk factors including hepatitis B or C virus and liver cirrhosis, a serum a-fetoprotein (AFP) level less than 200 IU/ml, and a radiologically compatible feature with HCC in two or more CT/MRI/angiograms or (iii) histological confirmation
- HCC patients who had recurrent or residual tumor after other treatments
- without evidence of extrahepatic metastasis
- the largest diameter of tumor should be less than 3cm, and the number of tumor ≤2
- no previous treatment to target tumors by other forms of RT
- liver function of Child-Pugh class A or B7 (Child-Pugh score of ≤7)
- Age of ≥18 years
- performance status of 0 to 2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
- WBC count ≥ 2,000/mm3; hemoglobin level ≥ 7.5 g/dL; platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3; and adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤ 3.0 mg/dL; AST and ALT \< 5.0× upper limit of normal; no ascites)
- no serious comorbidities other than liver cirrhosis
- written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- evidence of extrahepatic metastasis
- age \< 18 years
- liver function of Child-Pugh class B8-9 and C (Child-Pugh score of \>7) or uncontrolled cases of active chronic hepatitis B
- previous history of other forms of RT adjacent to target tumors
- poor performance status of 3 to 4 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
- pregnant or breast feeding status
- previous history uncontrolled other malignancies within 2 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cancer Center, Korea
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Kim TH, Koh YH, Kim BH, Kim MJ, Lee JH, Park B, Park JW. Proton beam radiotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized phase III trial. J Hepatol. 2021 Mar;74(3):603-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.026. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
PMID: 33031846DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joong Won Park, Ph.D
National Cancer Center, Korea
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 13, 2013
First Posted
October 16, 2013
Study Start
September 30, 2013
Primary Completion
January 20, 2020
Study Completion
January 20, 2020
Last Updated
October 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10