NCT01963429

Brief Summary

This phase 3 study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the comparison between radiofrequency ablation and hypofractionated proton beam radiation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
144

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 30, 2013

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 13, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 16, 2013

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 20, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 20, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 6, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6.3 years

First QC Date

October 13, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 4, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

hepatocellularProtonRFA

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • local progression-free survival(LPES)

    To evaluate the local progression-free survival for 2 years

    up to 2 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • disease-free survival (DFS)

    up to 2 years until study closed

Other Outcomes (1)

  • overall survival (OS)

    up to 2 years until study closed

Study Arms (2)

A(radiofrequency ablation )

EXPERIMENTAL

radiofrequency ablation

Procedure: radiofrequency ablation

B(Proton)

EXPERIMENTAL

hypofractionated proton beam therapy

Radiation: Proton beam therapy

Interventions

\* RFA(radiofrequency ablation ) * RFA electrode: Cool-tip RF ablation system (Covidien plc, 20 Lower Hatch Street Dublin 2, Ireland) and Well-Point RF Electrode (STARmed, Koea) * performed using either the manufacturer's standard algorithm or an interactive algorithm, with the latter being used when the impedance did not begin to increase at the midinterval of the standard algorithm * the duration of a single RFA session was 10 min to 15 min.

A(radiofrequency ablation )

\* Proton 66 GyE /10 fx, 6.6 GyE fraction dose, 5 days/week, for HCC free from the alimentary tract (i.e., stomach, duodenum, esophagus, small and large bowel) (more than 2cm from clinical target volume),TLV30\<40%,and/orRLV30\<30%)

B(Proton)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • HCC diagnosed as (i) the presence of risk factors including hepatitis B or C virus and liver cirrhosis, a serum a-fetoprotein (AFP) level greater than 200 IU/ml and a radiologically compatible feature with HCC in one or more CT/MRI/angiograms, or (ii) the presence of risk factors including hepatitis B or C virus and liver cirrhosis, a serum a-fetoprotein (AFP) level less than 200 IU/ml, and a radiologically compatible feature with HCC in two or more CT/MRI/angiograms or (iii) histological confirmation
  • HCC patients who had recurrent or residual tumor after other treatments
  • without evidence of extrahepatic metastasis
  • the largest diameter of tumor should be less than 3cm, and the number of tumor ≤2
  • no previous treatment to target tumors by other forms of RT
  • liver function of Child-Pugh class A or B7 (Child-Pugh score of ≤7)
  • Age of ≥18 years
  • performance status of 0 to 2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
  • WBC count ≥ 2,000/mm3; hemoglobin level ≥ 7.5 g/dL; platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3; and adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤ 3.0 mg/dL; AST and ALT \< 5.0× upper limit of normal; no ascites)
  • no serious comorbidities other than liver cirrhosis
  • written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • evidence of extrahepatic metastasis
  • age \< 18 years
  • liver function of Child-Pugh class B8-9 and C (Child-Pugh score of \>7) or uncontrolled cases of active chronic hepatitis B
  • previous history of other forms of RT adjacent to target tumors
  • poor performance status of 3 to 4 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
  • pregnant or breast feeding status
  • previous history uncontrolled other malignancies within 2 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Cancer Center, Korea

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Kim TH, Koh YH, Kim BH, Kim MJ, Lee JH, Park B, Park JW. Proton beam radiotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized phase III trial. J Hepatol. 2021 Mar;74(3):603-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.026. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Radiofrequency AblationProton Therapy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Radiofrequency TherapyTherapeuticsAblation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, OperativeHeavy Ion RadiotherapyRadiotherapy

Study Officials

  • Joong Won Park, Ph.D

    National Cancer Center, Korea

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2013

First Posted

October 16, 2013

Study Start

September 30, 2013

Primary Completion

January 20, 2020

Study Completion

January 20, 2020

Last Updated

October 6, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Locations