Linking Brain to Behaviour Research in SCI
Plasticity, Motor Learning and Functional Recovery Induced by Client-centred Task-oriented Training of the Upper Extremity in Tetraplegia
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction In recent years, client-centred and task-oriented training have emerged as important methods in rehabilitation including the rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). The task-oriented intervention focuses on resolving, reducing and preventing impairment, developing effective task-specific strategies and adapting functional goal-oriented strategies to changing environmental conditions. Currently, task-specific training is mainly achieved by constant practice (i.e. repeating the task without variation) and is reported to improve performance of the trained task, but to have a negative impact on untrained tasks. Practice variability, however, is reported being advantageous to transfer training results into daily live. This paradox poses challenges in clinical practice, where task-specific training is essential to deliver client-centred training in order to focus on the patients' specific individual goals, but practice variability is important to be able to transfer the learned task into daily practice. Questions regarding the effective elements within rehabilitative interventions and the exact mechanisms behind the cerebral changes they may induce, remain. These questions require further research, for which ultra-high field fMRI techniques will be used. Furthermore, compensation of muscle function loss (i.e. the development of new muscle synergies) plays an important role in the improvement of skill performance in cervical SCI. Surface EMG allows to study the changes in muscle coordination, parallel to the changes at cerebral level. Aims This study aims to
- 1.investigate which basic neural mechanisms of motor learning underlie functional recovery of arm hand skilled performance during client-centred task-oriented training of the upper limb in patients with cervical spinal cord injury and
- 2.investigate the contribution of 'practice variability' in contrast to 'constant practice' on arm-hand skilled performance, motor control and neural changes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 29, 2015
December 1, 2015
1.6 years
October 1, 2013
December 28, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change from baseline VanLieshout hand function test for Tetraplegia (Short Form) (VLT-SF) at 3 weeks
VLT-SF: assesses the actual performance of arm hand skills at the level of basic activities. The criterion validity, reliability, the internal consistency and the responsiveness of the VLT-SF were found to be good \[Spooren et al, Spinal Cord 2006; Post et al. Spinal Cord 2006\]. In the present study, the Rasch modified short form VLT will be used measuring both hands \[Spooren et al, Spinal Cord 2013a,b\].
Pre (4x baseline) & post intervention1 (3 weeks (4x))
Change from baseline VanLieshout hand function test for Tetraplegia (Short Form) (VLT-SF) at 6 weeks
VLT-SF: assesses the actual performance of arm hand skills at the level of basic activities. The criterion validity, reliability, the internal consistency and the responsiveness of the VLT-SF were found to be good \[Spooren et al, Spinal Cord 2006; Post et al. Spinal Cord 2006\]. In the present study, the Rasch modified short form VLT will be used measuring both hands \[Spooren et al, Spinal Cord 2013a,b\].
Pre (4x baseline) & post intervention2 (6 weeks (4x))
Changes from baseline surface electromyography (EMG) activity patterns at 3 weeks
During task performance (specific task and standardized arm hand tasks) muscle activity patterns will be recorded of main shoulder, arm and hand muscles using a 16 channel Trigno surface electromyography system (Delsys Inc, Boston, MA).
Pre (4x baseline) & post intervention1 (3 weeks (4x))
Changes from baseline surface electromyography (EMG) activity patterns at 6 weeks
During task performance (specific task and standardized arm hand tasks) muscle activity patterns will be recorded of main shoulder, arm and hand muscles using a 16 channel Trigno surface electromyography system (Delsys Inc, Boston, MA).
Pre (4x baseline) & post intervention2 (6 weeks (4x))
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change from baseline Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM (self-care)) at 3 weeks
Pre (4x baseline) & post intervention1 (3 weeks (4x))
Change from baseline Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM (self-care)) at 6 weeks
Pre (4x baseline) & post intervention2 (6 weeks (4x))
Changes from baseline Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) at 3 weeks
Pre (baseline) & post intervention1 (3 weeks)
Changes from baseline Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) at 6 weeks
Pre (baseline) & post intervention2 (6 weeks)
Changes from baseline Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) at 3 weeks
Pre (4x baseline) & post intervention1 (3 weeks (4x))
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
ToCUEST (constant or variable practice)
EXPERIMENTALAfter therapy as usual (intervention A), the Task-oriented Client-centred Upper Extremity Skill Training (ToCUEST) module (Spooren et al., 2011) will be given. In this program individual goals will be extracted using the COPM (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure) and the training program is based on a task-analysis and uses principles of training physiology and motor learning. Intervention B will consist of the ToCUEST program, including the component 'practice variability' (ToCUEST variability). Intervention C will consist of a modified ToCUEST program in which the component 'practice variability' will be replaced by 'constant practice' (ToCUEST constant) in order to evaluate the contribution of these components. Intervention A' will be therapy as usual.
Interventions
Intervention Variable practice: The ToCUEST (Task-Oriented Client-centred Upper Extremity Skill Training) module \[17\] will be given to the participants, in which individual goals will be extracted using the COPM (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure). The training program will start with a task analysis and is based on principles of training physiology and motor learning, including variability practice, random practice, distribution based practice, feedback, whole learning. A detailed description of the ToCUEST module is given in Spooren et al. \[17\]. Intervention B will be called 'ToCUEST variability' in the present project.
Intervention Constant practice: In order to evaluate the contribution of the component 'variability practice' in contrast with 'constant practice' the participants will be offered the modified ToCUEST ('ToCUEST constant') module in which the component 'variability practice' is replaced by 'constant practice'.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- in)complete C-SCI at level C3-T1; age between 18 and 70 years; patients are able to sit in a wheelchair for at least for 2 consecutive hours; presence of problems with specific arm-hand skilled performance
You may not qualify if:
- opinion of an independent rehabilitation physician that additional neurological, orthopaedic or rheumatologic diseases strongly interfere with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) functioning and arm hand skilled performance; inability to perform arm hand skilled performance measurements
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiologylead
- Adelante rehabilitation Centrecollaborator
- Maastricht Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Adelante Rehabilitation Centre
Hoensbroek, Limburg, 6432CC, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Henk AM Seelen, Dr.
Adelante Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology (NL)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Annemie IF Spooren, Dr.
University College PXL (Belgium)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amanda Kaas, Dr.
Maastricht University (NL)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Co-ordinator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2013
First Posted
October 16, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 29, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12