Study Stopped
REB approval was never issued
Fat Graft Myringoplasty With and Without Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) for Treating Smaller Tympanic Membrane Perforations
Efficacy of Fat Graft Myringoplasty Versus Fat Plus Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) Myringoplasty in Closing Smaller Tympanic Membrane Perforations in an Outpatient Setting: a Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
2 countries
4
Brief Summary
The current standard treatment for chronic tympanic membrane perforations (TMP) involves having fat grafted from the patient and inserted into the ear, through the perforation, to promote healing using the fat graft myringoplasty (FGM) technique. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) has also been used to promote TMP healing and involves having the patient provide a blood sample, which is processed to produce PRP and applied to the perforation. This prospective, multi-centre study will evaluate whether combining both these techniques can improve the rate of closure in patients with chronic TMP involving \<50% of the membrane. Patients will be randomized to receive either the standard FGM treatment or FGM treatment with the addition of PRP. At 3 months postintervention a blinded observer will rate the degree of TMP closure. Differences in closure rates between the 2 groups will be compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2015
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 21, 2024
September 1, 2013
Same day
October 7, 2013
August 19, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Presence or absence of tympanic membrane perforation
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Degree of perforation closure
3 months
Infection rate
3 months
Discomfort on using vinegar drops
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Fat graft without Platelet Rich Plasma
NO INTERVENTIONStep 1. Under Local Anaesthetic (or General Anaesthetic if the patient is unable to tolerate this), a fat graft is taken from just behind the mastoid process, or more posteriorly just beneath the hairline if necessary. The graft is kept moist in 0.9% saline.The ear canal is injected with local anaesthetic and the edges of the perforation are freshened. Gelfoam is placed into the middle ear and the fat graft placed on top of this until it touches the underside of the TM and slightly bulges through. In an attempt to achieve standardisation of surgical technique between sites, surgeons will be provided with an operative video to watch beforehand. Step 2. The fat graft will simply be covered with a piece of saline-soaked Gelfoam cut to completely cover the perforation and graft.
Fat graft with Platelet Rich Plasma
EXPERIMENTALProcedure as for as for Fat graft without PRP, but at Step 2 the Gelfoam will instead be soaked in PRP derived from the patient's own whole blood. The generation of PRP is descibed below: - * 10-20 mL of autologous blood collected from an antecubital vein is placed in an adenosine citrate dextrose-acid (ACD-A) collection tube to prevent premature activation * Blood immediately placed in the centrifuge at 1100g for 10 minutes (once) * Supernatant removed and collected into syringe * Injected onto surface of fat graft * Rest added to piece of gelfoam * Place gelfoam + PRP on the TM perforation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Tympanic membrane perforation measuring \<50% of the area of the membrane
- Perforation present for at least 6 months (based on history or direct observation)
- All edges of perforation are visible
You may not qualify if:
- Active ear infection at the time of the procedure
- cholesteatoma present
- Patients on immunosuppressive therapy (including oral steroids) or chemotherapy
- Patients with previous failed attempt at perforation repair
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Providence Health St Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
ENT department, Victoria General Hospital
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom
University Hospital North Staffordshire
Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manohar Bance, MD
Capital Health, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2013
First Posted
October 9, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2013-09